• Home
  • Reviews
  • Interviews
  • Lists
    • Yearly Top Tens
    • Trailers
Menu

World of Reel

Street Address
City, State, Zip
Phone Number
Home
BREAKING: Netflix Wins Bidding War to Acquire Warner Bros.
IMG_0988.jpeg
Matt Reeves Defends Paul Dano After Quentin Tarantino Calls Him “The Limpest Dick in the World”
IMG_0984.jpeg
Darren Aronofsky to Direct Gillian Flynn-Penned Erotic Thriller for Sony
Screenshot 2025-12-04 154349.png
‘Men in Black 5’ Eyes Will Smith Return
AFI’s Top 10 Films of 2025: Oscar Blueprint or Major Snubs?
AFI’s Top 10 Films of 2025: Oscar Blueprint or Major Snubs?
Featured
Capture.PNG
Aug 19, 2019
3-Hour ‘Midsommar' Director's Cut Screened in NYC
Aug 19, 2019

This year’s 12th edition of the Scary Movies festival at Film at Lincoln Center premiered Ari Aster’s extended version of “Midsommar” this past Saturday.

Aug 19, 2019

World of Reel

  • Home
  • Reviews
  • Interviews
  • Lists
  • More
    • Yearly Top Tens
    • Trailers

Pixar Has Lost its Creative Mojo

March 1, 2022 Jordan Ruimy

Between 2000 and 2010, every movie Pixar released was either very good or a flat-out masterpiece. At some point, they were taking major artistic risks. Think of the radical, dialogue-free first act of “WALL-E,” the touching 10-minute life story of Carl and Ellie in Up!, the terrifying final few minutes in “Toy Story 3,” Nemo's mom dying in the opening minutes of “Finding Nemo,” and Bing Bong's “sacrifice” in “Inside Out”. All incredibly risky narrative decisions.

Nowadays we're seeing a lot more sequels and less of the transcendent moments that I've just mentioned. Sure, there's 2017’s wildly colorful and exuberant paean to Mexican culture, "Coco," but as much as I liked that film, and I really did, it resorted to conventional storytelling and lacked the risk-taking of the aforementioned classics. There were shades of brilliance in 2020’s “Soul,” an ambitious tackling of the meaning of life via a failed jazz musician.

Nowadays, Pixar either releases disappointing sequels ("Incredibles 2,” “Finding Dory,” “Toy Story 4,” “Cars 3”) or slight narratives that don’t push the boundaries of animation (“Luca,” “Onward,” “The Good Dinosaur”) . With the exceptions of “Toy Story 2” and “Toy Story 3,” Pixar has had lackluster continuations to their classics. 

I was reminded of this drought while watching Pixar’s latest feature, this one titled “Turning Red,” a fine-as-it-goes movie that feels as disposable as their recent fare. You now have to wonder if Pixar has lost a bit of its edge. Their dive into the business of sequels has watered down their reputation.

What's next for Pixar? “Lightyear,” another sequel, or actually a prequel to "Toy Story.”

← ‘Fresh’: Shocking Genre Movie Redefines the Rom-Com [Capsule]Madonna Has Decided to Direct Biopic About Her Own Life →

FOLLOW US!


Trending

Featured
IMG_0351.webp
Josh Safdie’s ‘Marty Supreme’ is One of the Best Films of the Year — Timothée Chalamet Has Never Been Better
IMG_0815.jpeg
Six-Minute Prologue of Christopher Nolan’s ‘The Odyssey’ Coming to Select IMAX 70mm Screenings December 12
IMG_0711.jpeg
James Cameron: Netflix Movies Shouldn’t Be Eligible for Oscars
IMG_0685.jpeg
Brady Corbet Confirms Untitled 4-Hour Western Will Be X-Rated, Shot in 70mm, Filming Next Summer

Critics Polls

Featured
Capture.PNG
Critics Poll: ‘Vertigo’ Named Best Film of the 1950s, Over 120 Participants
B16BAC21-5652-44F6-9E83-A1A5C5DF61D7.jpeg
Critics Poll: Kubrick’s ‘2001: A Space Odyssey’ Tops Our 1960s Critics Poll
Capture.PNG
Critics Poll: ‘The Godfather’ Named Best Movie of the 1970s
public.jpeg
Critics Poll: ‘Do the Right Thing' Named Best Movie of the 1980s
World of Reel tagline.PNG
 

Content

Contribute

Hire me

 

Support

Advertise

Donate

 

About

Team

Contact

Privacy Policy

Site designed by Jordan Ruimy © 2025