• Home
  • Interviews
    • Yearly Top Tens
Menu

World of Reel

Street Address
City, State, Zip
Phone Number
Home
IMG_3075.jpeg
James Cameron Backs Paramount: Netflix-Warner Bros. Deal Would Be “Disastrous”
IMG_3070.jpeg
Matthew McConaughey Predicts Oscars Could Soon Have “Best AI Film” and “Best AI Actor”: “Five Years”
IMG_3066.jpeg
Oliver Laxe (‘Sirat’) Says His Next Film Will Be His ‘2001’: “We Will Invite Spectators to Experience Catharsis”
IMG_3065.jpeg
Cameron Diaz, Drew Barrymore and Lucy Liu to Return for ‘Charlie’s Angels’ Reboot
IMG_3064.jpeg
Eddie Redmayne to Star in Hirokazu Kore-eda’s Next Film, Set Up at Searchlight Pictures
Featured
Capture.PNG
Aug 19, 2019
3-Hour ‘Midsommar' Director's Cut Screened in NYC
Aug 19, 2019

This year’s 12th edition of the Scary Movies festival at Film at Lincoln Center premiered Ari Aster’s extended version of “Midsommar” this past Saturday.

Aug 19, 2019

World of Reel

  • Home
  • Interviews
  • More
    • Yearly Top Tens

Pixar Has Lost its Creative Mojo

March 1, 2022 Jordan Ruimy

Between 2000 and 2010, every movie Pixar released was either very good or a flat-out masterpiece. At some point, they were taking major artistic risks. Think of the radical, dialogue-free first act of “WALL-E,” the touching 10-minute life story of Carl and Ellie in Up!, the terrifying final few minutes in “Toy Story 3,” Nemo's mom dying in the opening minutes of “Finding Nemo,” and Bing Bong's “sacrifice” in “Inside Out”. All incredibly risky narrative decisions.

Nowadays we're seeing a lot more sequels and less of the transcendent moments that I've just mentioned. Sure, there's 2017’s wildly colorful and exuberant paean to Mexican culture, "Coco," but as much as I liked that film, and I really did, it resorted to conventional storytelling and lacked the risk-taking of the aforementioned classics. There were shades of brilliance in 2020’s “Soul,” an ambitious tackling of the meaning of life via a failed jazz musician.

Nowadays, Pixar either releases disappointing sequels ("Incredibles 2,” “Finding Dory,” “Toy Story 4,” “Cars 3”) or slight narratives that don’t push the boundaries of animation (“Luca,” “Onward,” “The Good Dinosaur”) . With the exceptions of “Toy Story 2” and “Toy Story 3,” Pixar has had lackluster continuations to their classics. 

I was reminded of this drought while watching Pixar’s latest feature, this one titled “Turning Red,” a fine-as-it-goes movie that feels as disposable as their recent fare. You now have to wonder if Pixar has lost a bit of its edge. Their dive into the business of sequels has watered down their reputation.

What's next for Pixar? “Lightyear,” another sequel, or actually a prequel to "Toy Story.”

← ‘Fresh’: Shocking Genre Movie Redefines the Rom-Com [Capsule]Madonna Has Decided to Direct Biopic About Her Own Life →

FOLLOW US!


Trending

Featured
IMG_3015.jpeg
‘28 Years Later: The Bone Temple’ Hits VOD — Third Chapter Now in Limbo
IMG_2931.jpeg
Were the ’90s Really the Last “Golden Age” for American Cinema — and If Not, Who Comes Next?
IMG_2865.jpeg
Cannes 2026: Almodóvar Looms, Coen Submits, and Malick’s 3.5-Hour Cut Circles Again
IMG_2229.jpeg
Steven Spielberg’s ‘Bullitt’ Reboot, Starring Bradley Cooper, No Longer Happening

Critics Polls

Featured
Capture.PNG
Critics Poll: ‘Vertigo’ Named Best Film of the 1950s, Over 120 Participants
B16BAC21-5652-44F6-9E83-A1A5C5DF61D7.jpeg
Critics Poll: Kubrick’s ‘2001: A Space Odyssey’ Tops Our 1960s Critics Poll
Capture.PNG
Critics Poll: ‘The Godfather’ Named Best Movie of the 1970s
public.jpeg
Critics Poll: ‘Do the Right Thing' Named Best Movie of the 1980s
World of Reel tagline.PNG
 

Content

Contribute

Hire me

 

Support

Advertise

Donate

 

About

Team

Contact

Privacy Policy

Site designed by Jordan Ruimy © 2025