For Buster Keaton's birthday, five minutes of his best stunts



Who needed Tom Cruise and 3D in 1918 when you had Buster Keaton?

Simple, yet brilliant, this is Buster Keaton's genius explained in just a few seconds. Slate's film critic (Dana Stevens) has been working on a book about Keaton for some time. I'm really looking forward to reading it when it comes out. If you want to see absolute cinematic insanity, watch "The General." That film, like most of Keaton's, is full of death defying stunts. That's why it's considered one of the greats of all-time, for my money better than any stunts Chaplin ever did. Keaton was probably the bravest actor in Hollywood history.








It's no surprise that I find it very hard to choose between Chaplin and Keaton. "The General" is an astounding technical achievement, even more so now 91 years after its release. "The Navigator" is also a delightful Keaton feature from 1924 that has aged magnificently well. In fact, one of the reasons why Keaton might just surpass Chaplin in my books is that, despite being almost a century old, his movies have aged like fine wine. Which is not to say Chaplin's haven't either, they have, but Keaton had that extra oomph, that edge that seems to fit quite perfectly with modern-day filmmaking (just look at 2018 audiences and the critics alike going gaga over Tom Cruise doing his own stunts). 

You know what kids, I think Keaton did it better. No, really, his stunts, all brilliantly conceived, would be far too risky to achieve in this day and age, even by Tom Cruise standards. 

Image result for buster keaton stunt gif
Related image
Image result for buster keaton stunt gif
Image result for buster keaton stunt gif
Image result for buster keaton stunt gif
Image result for buster keaton stunt gif
Image result for buster keaton stunt gif
Image result for buster keaton gif
Image result for buster keaton gif

Wes Anderson’s Next Movie Set In Post-WWII France



Director Wes Anderson is known to take his time in-between each released film of his. However, it seems that soon after this year's "Isle of Dogs," Anderson jumped right into another project, which could potentially be released next year.

Yesterday I wrote about Anderson prepping his 10th feature film with production set to begin in February 2019 and wrapping on May 2019.  No details were known about the plot/setting but now, according to French publication Sud Ouest, it this mysterious new project will take place in France and be set right after World War II. 
Anderson, an avid Francophile, lives in France and so it is not that surprising to hear he will be writing looks to be, by all accounts, a French story. 

Trailer: Gaspar Noe's “Climax" is a visionary trip to the deep pits of dance-hall hell

Gaspar Noe's "Climax" will no doubt cause a lot of heads to spin, in both good ways and bad. Many of the reviews have mentioned how it is his best movie, I would have to actually make a case for "Enter the Void" to be his crowning achievement, a film that will stand the test of time. Suffice to say, critics went gaga for it at La Croisette. I really liked it but felt the excess finally caught up to it in its final few moments. That's all fine and dandy. As far as I'm concerned Noe has never made a boring film in his career, although his previous film, the 3D explicit sex film "Love," started to feel pedantic and dull in its second hour, and "Climax" is anything but boring.

Taken from a review I wrote at Cannes titled: "Gaspar Noe's "Climax": Vibrant dance movie and horrific bad-trip" (5.18.18)

"Gaspar Noe‘s Climax is split into two movies, both running about 45 minutes, both relying on risky, over-the-top camerawork and both heavily relying on an EDM soundtrack."

"The first half, one of the best dance sequences I have ever seen on film, feels alive and vibrant with cinematic prowess, it's the far better half. by then Climax feels like it's worth the hype it's gotten, a wildly breathless entertainment with single take Steadicam shots of pro, millennial dancers auditioning for a tour of some kind inside a modest-sized dance hall. The 45-minute dancing sequence is gloriously nuts. I really mean it, it makes you want to get up from your seat and join the party. The beauty of it is that there really isn't a specific dance style being used in unison by the youngsters, they just improvise and that's the beauty of it. Only movies can make you feel the way Climax does."

"The way cinematographer Benoit Debie’s cameras create the atmosphere, especially in the 15-minute opening sequence is riveting. My eyes were popped wide open, and that almost never happens. Characters are then revealed. There's the guy that claims he's had sex with most of the female dancers in the room; There are two other guys that tout their explicit sexual accomplishments;  a woman who actually brings her kid to the party; etc."

"The second half. Oh boy, I have to mention that when the dancing occurs the dancers are drinking a sangria cocktail that was brought by a dancer, they start to severely bad-trip as they are dancing, and suspect that somebody spiked the drink. Although LSD is mentioned as a possibility, there is no way in hell it can uniformly make you feel the way it makes the characters in this film react. The drug is clearly predatory, my assumption is it's some kind of cocktail of hallucinogens that was added to the sangria. Alas, the horror portion of the film is upon us."

"Every dancer goes nuts. After the pure joy of the first half, this descent into a hell state is quite unnerving."

"Noe is trying to present to us what happens when you have the highest of highs and then go to the lowest of lows. The good vibes are totally gone when the freakout happens, Finger-pointing happens about who may have spiked the drinks, which leads to some fighting. Sofia Boutella is the anchor that leads us through this hell, which, I must admit starts to take its toll near the last quarter of the film, but before that Noe, whom I have loved in the past, especially his underseen masterpiece "Enter the Void," creates a breathless movie that will likely have major staying power for viewers."

A24 will be releasing "Climax" sometime late this year/early next year.

CLIMAX-03-AFTER-ANGLAIS-RVB_A24_WEB

Two-Thirds of the Year Gone. Here Are the 30 Best Movies of 2018 so far

2018 releases:

  1. The Tale

  2. Burning

  3. Leave No Trace

  4. Custody

  5. BlackKklansman

  6. Eighth Grade

  7. A Quiet Place / Hereditary

  8. Cold War

  9. The Ride

  10. The Wife

  11. Three Identical Strangers

  12. Searching

  13. Tully

  14. Sorry To Bother You

  15. Mission: Impossible — Fallout

  16. Won't You Be My Neighbor

  17. Isle of Dogs

  18. Whitney

  19. You Were Never Really Here

  20. Game Night

  21. The Guilty

  22. Lean on Pete

  23. Red Sparrow

  24. Ready Player One

  25. After Everything

  26. Paddington 2

  27. The Polka King

  28. Godard Mon Amour

  29. Capernaum

  30. The House That Jack Built

2019 releases:

  1. Dogman

  2. Cam

  3. The Man Who Killed Don Quixote

  4. Climax

  5. Border

  6. Happy as Lazzaro

  7. Girl

  8. Aykan

  9. On Her Shoulders

  10. Ash Is Purest White

  11. The Wild Pear Tree

Twitter Backlash Claims Gay Actress Ruby Rose Isn’t "Gay Enough" and "Jewish Enough" to Play Batwoman

Image result for ruby rose
Actress Ruby Rose has quit Twitter.

I didn't know much about Rose until this weekend's release of the shark attack flick "The Meg." I didn't know either that Rose, an outspoken member of LGBTQ, was to play Batwoman in an upcoming CW series, as part of their Arrowverse TV universe.
What I don't understand is how the casting of Rose managed to be about her sexuality on Twitter. Did they not realize she was a lesbian? Or was she not lesbian enough for them? To some, the fact that Rose isn't even Jewish, Batwoman Kate Kane is a Lesbian of Jewish descent, is a problem:
In her open letter to THR, about why she had to quit Twitter, Rose has this to say:

Where on earth did ‘Ruby is not a lesbian therefore she can’t be batwoman’ come from — has to be the funniest most ridiculous thing I’ve ever read. I came out at 12? And have for the past 5 years had to deal with ‘she’s too gay’ how do y’all flip it like that? I didn’t change. I wish we would all support each other and our journeys.
"When women and when minorities join forces we are unstoppable… when we tear each other down it’s much more hurtful than from any group. But hey/ love a challenge I just wish women and the LGBT community supported each other more, My wish was we were all a little kinder and more supportive of each other…Sending everyone my love and gratitude, it’s been a rollercoaster of a year, this month especially."
"I am looking forward to getting more than 4 hours of sleep and to break from Twitter to focus all my energy on my next 2 projects. If you need me, I’ll be on my Bat Phone.”

Mark Wahlberg on Oscar's "Outstanding Popular Film" category: "If they’d had the category before, we’d have won a couple of them,"

Image result for wahlberg funny
Mark Wahlberg was asked by Variety about what he thought of the new Oscars category:
“Maybe if they’d had the category before, we’d have won a couple of them,” he said. “We’ve had some really commercially successful films that we think certainly warranted that kind of notoriety. We make films that we want people to enjoy and if we get those kind of accolades, fantastic. If not, we make the movies for audiences to enjoy.”
“There are a lot of great films out there that happen to be very popular and haven’t been recognized that probably deserve the recognition,” Wahlberg continued.
What? You mean artful stuff like “Transformers: The Last Knight,” “Daddy’s Home 2,” “The Happening.” and "Ted"? Good stuff bruh. 
Former MMA/UFC champ, Ronda Rousey is another "actress" that believes in the "Popular film" category: “I might have a shot,” Rousey laughed. “Finally, I’m in the running for an Academy Award. I’m gunning for the outstanding achievement in popular film [award]. You heard it now. Vote for me.”

Wes Anderson already preparing to shoot his next movie

God bless Wes Anderson. He's one of the few original voices left in Hollywood. His "Isle of Dogs" opened earlier this year to positive reviews but also a backlash about Japanese cultural appropriation, which I refuse to delve into here.

Anderson is reportedly already prepping his next feature, his 10th, according to France's Premiere. The writer-director has been scouting location and settled for Angoulême, France as the location for his next movie with production set to begin in February 2019 and wrapping on May 2019. Anderson is known to shoot his live-action works on location, which would suggest his 10th film will be set in France. 

No details are known yet about this new film from Anderson and whether it'll be in stop-motion form like "Isle of Dogs" and "The Fantastic Mr. Fox" were, but the director took a break from animation after 2009's "Fox" and made two live action films, in a span of 9 years, before going back to stop-motion animation with "Dogs."

The Anderson peaks for me are "The Royal Tenenbaums," "Moonrise Kingdom" and "The Fantastic Mr. Fox" and "The Grand Budapest Hotel."

Congrats movie fans, you've helped "The Meg," one of the worst movies of the year, make close to $45M on its opening weekend

Image result for the meg
What can I say? Anybody that insinuates the positive effect Rotten Tomatoes might have on the moviegoer choosing wisely their movie purchasing has been disseminated this Summer with the successes of such inanities as "Jurassic World," "Hotel Transylvania 3" and now "the Jason Statham" shark-attack movie "The Meg having made $96.8 million overseas, and $44.5 million domestically. Is "The Meg" a horrible, unwatchable film? Of course not, but it's a B-movie infused with the kind of brainless narrative whose success is dangerous to cinematic quality's future in Hollywood. 
In fact, a look at the box-office winners of the week and you realize that more than half of them are 70% or less on Rotten Tomatoes.
1. The Meg — $44.5M (Debut)
2. Mission: Impossible — Fallout — $20M ($162M Overall)
3. Disney’s Christopher Robin — $12.4M ($50M)
4. Slender Man — $11.3M (Debut)
5. BlacKkKlansman — $10.8M (Debut)
6. The Spy Who Dumped Me — $6.6M ($24.6M)
7. Mamma Mia! Here We Go Again — $5.8M ($104M)
8. The Equalizer 2 — $5.5M ($89.6M)
9. Hotel Transylvania 3: Summer Vacation — $5.1M (147M)
10. Ant-Man and the Wasp — $4M ($203.5M)
It's not like there are bad movies out there either. Yeah, maybe the major studio system at a standstill in terms of quality cinema but the adventurous moviegoer probably had a great summer at the movies with the likes of "Leave No Trace," "BlackKklansman," "Hereditary," "Sorry to Bother You," "First Reformed," "Three Identical Strangers," "The Wife," "Searching" and "Whitney." 
The only major studio movie to have risen to the level of art this past summer? "Mission: Impossible - Fallout." And it'll probably be the solo exception as we only have 17 days before summer movie season is officially over. That is unless Melissa McCarthy's R-rated puppet movie "The Happytime Murders" can prove to be a winner and director Peter Berg's "22 Mile" proves to be as good as "Lone Survivor" and "Patriots Day."

Orson Welles' daughter Beatrice on Netflix releasing "The Other Side of the Wind": "My father would have hated it"

Image result for orson welles beatrice
[A big thanks to Jeffrey Wells over at HE for the heads-up]

Beatrice Wells and her relationship with dad Orson has been the stuff of speculative disagreement for decades, even coming from the main source herself. Beatrice told Scott Mantz, a few years ago, that Orson “Was the best father in the world,”  And yet, here she is, less than three weeks before Welles’ long gestating project "The Other Side of the Wind" premieres at the Venice Film Festival, Beatrice has decided that he wasn't good father after all..
Bryan Appleyard of the Sunday Times‘ has quoted Beatrice as saying she will be going to Venice but that “It’s not what I wanted for it, it’s not my movie, it was never my movie, I just had better ideas about how it could end.” Uh-huh. And…?
“I have to talk about it, and I have to be Orson Welles’ daughter,” Beatrice goes on. “I really honestly can’t tell the truth on this one. I hope I’m going to be writing a book finally, and I hope I’m allowed to tell the truth of what’s going on behind that movie.”
"[The Other Side of the Wind] is in the hands [of people] my father would have hated.” 
A little bit of jealousy? Does Beatrice hate the fact that she had no power whatsoever to be part of the creative team for "The Other Side of the Wind" project?


Maggie Gyllenhaal is Mesmerizing in Upcoming Netflix Movie "The Kindergarten Teacher"


Sara Colangelo's remake of the Israeli film "The Kindergarten Teacher" is a fascinating character study which features an awards-worthy lead performance. 

Here's what I wrote about the film this past January:

"Maggie Gyllenhaal is a Staten Island early-childhood educator who starts obsessing over a gifted student, which leads to problems too good to reveal in this capsule. Sara Colangelo’s American remake of the similarly-titled Israeli drama maintains its own unique identity. However, the movie belongs to Gyllenhaal, who keeps playing with our heads throughout the film. The fact that she maintains the sympathetic nature of her character makes this brilliant film all the more mysterious." 

Gyllenhaal is part of a stellar cast which includes Parker SevakAnna BaryshnikovRosa SalazarMichael Chernus, and Gael Garcia Bernal.
“The Kindergarten Teacher” hits Netflix on October 12.

'I Love You, Daddy’ Star Chloë Grace Moretz Says the Unreleased Louis C.K. Movie Deserves to 'Just Kind Of Go Away’

Image result for louis ck
Despite Louis C.K. facing multiple sexual harassment claims against him (five women in a report by The New York Times) and refusing to lawyer up, the industry is"swiftly backing away from the director, actor, and writer."  Is his career done? Who knows, my bet is it probably is. I mean, at some point he was outright refusing to comment on the allegations, which started as early as April of last year by saying “I’m not going to answer to that stuff, because they’re rumors. If you actually participate in a rumor, you make it bigger and you make it real.”
Now that those allegations are no longer "rumors," the release of his new movie, "I Love You, Daddy" which he wrote, directed and starred in, has been scrapped and its studio, The Orchard, have altogether parted ways with it. Netflixhas also cancelled his upcoming stand-up special. 
And so, with not much choice left but to release a statement, the 50-year-old comedian did to THR. It was fine, he fessed up, admitted what he did was wrong, but that didn't really change his inevitable downfall from the industry
“I Love You, Daddy” premiered at the Toronto International Film Festival last year, where The Orchard picked it up for distributon. The film had a theatrical release date planned for November 17, 2017, but was pulled from schedule after the allegations against C.K were proven to be true.
Chloë Grace Moretz, who stars as C.K.’s daughter in “I Love You, Daddy” has admitted her true feelings for the film in an interview with The New York Times (via Vulture). Moretz wants nothing to do with it and disagree's with C.K.'s plan of potentially buying back the rights to the film and distributing it himself:
I think it should just kind of go away, honestly. I don’t think it’s time for them to have a voice right now,” Moretz said, I'm sure in refrence to the #MeToo pervs that have been caught since the movement began.
“Of course, it’s devastating to put time into a project and have it disappear,” she continued. “But at the same time, this movement is so powerful and so progressive that I’m just happy to be in communication with everyone and to see the big change in the face of the industry, which I think is very, very real.”

"I Love You, Daddy" was CK's  ode to Woody Allen but, more specifically, "Manhattan." Shot in black-and-white and set in New York City it featured an old-fashioned romantic musical score, but retained the talky neuroses of Allen's 1979 classic.  I thought it was slight, not anything of remote substance, when I saw it last September [Review].

Report: Could Disney Rehire James Gunn? Marvel Is Trying to Convince Them

Image result for james gunn

Just when we thought James Gunn was toast at Disney comes this report from Deadline implying there is a last-ditch effort from Marvel to try and persuade Disney to hire Gunn back. 
Here's what I think. The firing of Roseanne complicated things for Disney. If they were to re-hire Gunn there would be a strong opposition from the right about political bias. Why should Disney care about this incoming backlash? Because they have a brand to protect. Tweets about rape and pedophilia, such as those dug up about Gunn's past, probably don't give you the right to a happy ending over at the mouse house.

More to come ....

BLASPHEMY: "Venom" will be rated PG-13

Image result for venom movie

I have sent countless warning shots to Sony over the past year begging them, no pleading with them, to not cower down and give "Venom" a PG-13 rating instead of the R rating it deserves. There is no way around it, Venom cannot be rated PG-13. It would be a disservice to the comic book and it would be a great disservice to the fans.

According to Variety, even though many, including myself, assumed that the film would be R-rated, Sony is now planning on releasing “Venom” as PG-13. Good God. The report stresses the concern of what an R-rating could do in damaging box-office prospects. Oy vey. Sony is clearly not going the “Logan” and “Deadpool” route here. They are playing it safe, folks.
Image result for venom gif
What I find rather strange is that most of the cast and crew have been saying an R-rating was the plan. Director Ruben Fleischer was even quoted in saying [via ComicBook.com]“That’s the plan. It is not the plan, that’s the movie. Our movie wants to honor the comics as close as we can tonally. In the comics, he bites people’s heads off and eats brains. It would be weird to make a movie with Venom if he wasn’t doing that. We tried to honor it as closely as possible. This is definitely a darker, more violent, more vicious Marvel character than I think anyone’s ever seen before.”


The real kicker from the Variety report is this quote 
from Sanford Panitch, president of Columbia Pictures.“We’re focused on being faithful to the comics.” Gimme a break. You're not being faithful to Venom with a PG-13 rating. You're being ignorant to the spirit of the character.

"Crazy Rich Asians" stars talk about this being the first all-Asian cast Hollywood movie in 25 years

Image result for crazy rich asians cast

In a summer of weekly blockbusters, sometimes even the most historic of movies might get lost in the shuffle. Let's try to not make that be the case with "Crazy Rich Asians" the first Hollywood movie with an all-Asian cast since 1993's 'The Joy Luck Club." That's 25 years of major studios shunning the Asian-American experience for the bottom line. Much-heralded novelist Kevin Kwan wanted to stop them.

Earlier this decade Kwan released a popular trilogy of books, "Crazy Rich Asians," "China Rich Girlfriend," "Rich People Problems," which garnered him a spot on Time Magazine's 100 most influential people's list. These novels were sprawling, multi-generational takes on the Asian experience in America and abroad. Hollywood soon came calling.

"Crazy Rich Asians" is the first adaptation of Kwan's books, a contemporary romantic comedy, based on Kwan's childhood, which follows native New Yorker Rachel Chu (Constance Wu) to Singapore as she is about to meet her boyfriend Nick's (Henry Golding) disapproving family. The film, directed by Jon M. Chu ("Step Up: 3D"), stars Wu, Golding, Michelle Yeoh, Gemma Chan and Jimmy Yang.

Director Chu shows a real knack for the visual as his film is splattered with colorfully vibrant images of a Singapore of our dreams as multiple traditions and backgrounds clash in a country filled with severe economic inequality. The story is a conventional one, but it's the way Chu makes us see the familiar with a whole new set of eyes that makes "Crazy Rich Asians" stand out. To say his film is a ground-breaker for what's on-paper would be an understatement, but the story itself, very much part of the rom-com genre, is richly delivered and textured in ways that feel fresh and authentic.

Jimmy Yang, Gemma Chan and author Kevin Kwan gave us their take on the importance of such a movie within the industry:

Yang: I couldn't believe this was getting made and I wanted to be a part of this. As development went on I started to realize how important this project was. It was a good, funny script. I was excited to audition. Then I started to listen to the audio books. When the movie started to shoot, landing in Singapore, the whole cast got along right away "Oh you like Asian food too?" [Laughs] It was such a special bond that all of us have and still have and we're still really good friends.

Kevin Kwan: Which I'm told never happens. You see them and then you never see them again.

Yang: Yeah, all the time. I maybe have one friend from each movie I've made. However, whenever these two are in L.A. or come to town it's like "let's hang!" We are each other's priority because for me, culturally, I feel like I found my Cree, my peers, which has been very hard for me as a comic and as an actor so hopefully the audience will feel the same way. I hope that when Asians see this movie they will be like "Oh finally our voice is being represented and our faces are being represented. Hopefully this is one of many more movies to come that feature Asian casts, I hope we will open some doors.

Chan: What excited me when I read the script, and the books, was that the themes in it were very universal: love, friendship, family, relationships, all the themes that could be old and new, and span many generations. I felt that all of that could be something that could resonate not just with Asian audience but with non-Asian as well. It's just about something that could speak to all of us. For so long the universal experience seems to have been white, this movie shows that it doesn't have to be. Anyone that watches this film can identify and feel what the characters feel. 

Yang: Yeah, it's an Asian story but at the same time it's a very authentic story. [Author] Kevin Kwan knew all these people, so he based it off of experiences, so I think it also encourages more authentic story writing and it's not necessarily pushing "Asian, Asian, Asian, Asian!" I feel like this film just encourages personal storytelling.

Kwan: There was that infamous producer that told us to switch the female lead to a white "Reese Johannson" [laughs] I didn't even entertain that option, I was told "It's a pity you don't have a white character." However, every other producer that came to us was interested in the idea of his film because of the story, which is really a story that transcends race. It cultivates Asians but it's not just because they're Asian. I even optioned the movie for $1 instead of any 5 or 6 figures deal I could have done. I needed to maintain the creative purpose of "Crazy Rich Asians" before having anybody in Hollywood botch it.  I've said this before, the Netflix route was there, but we didn't go that direction because I wanted a cinematic experience to accompany the first all-Asian film in 25 years.

Yang:  That's part of the reason why we jumped on-board. Kevin had so much source material that he easily just took you to this other world with these stories. We watched the trailer at the wrap party, just a little video montage of footage that John made for the cast. And I was just amazed at the colors, the people, the sets.

Kwan: The music!

Yang: The music! It felt like this wasn't just a bunch of Asian people, this took you to fucking Narnia. It's a whole new world that Kevin set up that everybody can enjoy. It just so happens that everyone in this world is Asian. 

Yang: I felt like I did a straight Hong Kong accent. I had a conversation with John and was able to do that. Here's the thing, if a white American actor like Brad Pitt does a British accent really well then people say that's "art," he should win an Oscar etc. but when an Asian actor does an authentic Mandarin accent or Cantonese accent people scream that it's "misrepresentation" or "stereotypical." Are you serious? How come we, as Asian-American actors, are not judged on our skills and our acting abilities instead we are judged a lot of the time on how good of a representation it which is frustrating. This movie is not that. "Crazy Rich Asians" has a spectrum of us. Ronnie Chen, whom inherently has an accent, a Malay accent, all the Singaporeans had a Singaporean accent, Jenna has a British accent, all these accents just coming together makes us able to serve the story instead of serving ourselves as Asian actors. The liberating part with this movie is that people will be able to judge our performances and judge the film cinematically instead of trying to see it as "I'm a good Asian or I'm a bad Asian." How about "Are we good filmmakers or bad filmmakers?" "Are we good actors or bad actors?"

Jeremy Saulnier's "Hold the Dark" to Premiere on Netflix September 28th



have been a fervent fan of Jeremy Saulnier's ever since I saw his 2014 crime classic "Blue Ruin." He followed that up with a viscerally brutal delve into the Punk/Nazi underground with 2016's“Green Room.” Suffice to say, at a time when most studios are balking at any kind of personal vision being brought forth to the big-screen, Saulnier is managing to build an auteur career. 
It's no surprise then, that given the limitations of today's industry for green-lighting non-franchise fare, that Saulnier has decided to team-up with Netflix for his next movie "Hold the Dark."

This latest venture into hell from Saulnier follows a wolf expert that travels to an Alaskan villageto investigate the disappearances of three children, who may or may not have been killed by wolves.
“This film has so many firsts for me,” Saulnier said (via EMPIRE). “It has my record number of intimate dialogue scenes and my highest body count. It has my first war scene, my first aerial sequence, my first time working extensively with animals. So in that regard it was a huge challenge.”
Alexander Skarsgård and Jeffrey Wright star in the film, which was supposed to premiere at this year’s Cannes Film Festival, but the feud between Netflix and the fest prevented it from showing up on the red steps. There has also been no word on a pre-release festival showing, which surprises me to no end. Why not bring it to TIFF? The Midnight madness program this year could have used Saulnier's pedigree. Doesn't look like it will happen. Now, the film will have a Netflix premiere on September 28.

Michael Moore's “Fahrenheit 11/9," “Halloween" & Shane Black’s “The Predator" Set for World Premieres at TIFF

Michael Moore The Predator

I am looking forward in attending this upcoming September's Toronto International Film festival, so much anticipated stuff will premiere there, many films that aren't even part of the Venice or Telluride lineups.

Take for example Shane Black’s “The Predator” and David Gordon Green's highly-anticipated “Halloween.” Both will premiere as part of TIFF's Midnight Madness program. 

However, looking a little closer and you notice two Cannes highlights: Gaspar Noé’s Climax” and "Diamantino." British filmmaker Peter Strickland will premiere “In Fabric” and “Assassination Nation,” which I didn't like when I saw it in January, will also premiere as part of the program.

Black's "Predator" has been switching release dates left and right and been plagued by re-shoots, however don't discount it just yet. As for Gordon Green's "Halloween" remake/reboot, whatever you want to call it, well, buzz is tremendous for it.

The TIFF Docs section was also announced and it'll include more than 27 feature-length non-fiction films, the kick-off is to open with Michael Moore’s “Fahrenheit 11/9.” Other potential highlights include Errol Morris' Steve Bannon doc "American Dharma" and Frederick Wiseman's "Monrovia, Indiana."

Note to Oscar: Awards Shows Just Aren't as Relevant as They Used to Be

Image result for oscars speeches crying

Before today's Oscar drama, it was fairly known around the entertainment world that the Academy Awards had declining ratings and that their aura, their prestige, was no doubt on a free-fall as well.

A total of 26.6 million viewers watched the 2018 Oscars. The Academy Awards had a 19% decline in viewership that year when compared to 2017's telecast, and a 39% drop from the show’s recent peak in 2014. The coveted 18-49 demo fell 24% from 2017 and 47% from 2014. 

Disney-ABC have a contractual agreement with the Academy to broadcast the Oscars until 2028. Ratings must stay above sea-level. At the moment, they are below. 

With all that food for thought, Variety is reporting that a few days after 90th Academy Awards telecast aired in March "Disney-ABC Television Group executives met with leaders of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences to convey a message" and face the inevitable and dire elephant in the room: The increasing irrelevance of the Academy.

Variety goes on to add that  "At the come-to-Jesus meeting after March’s show, the TV people walked through the lousy ratings at a granular level, identifying precise moments during the show that prompted viewers to stop watching. They made several recommendations about the ways that the telecast’s length could be reigned in, and proposed a “best blockbuster” category that would reward films that had been seen by larger audiences. They also argued that viewers had become fatigued by the ever-increasing number of televised awards shows — including the Golden Globe Awards, whose viewership has been relatively stable in recent years — and that the Oscars should be moved to an early calendar period."

To ABC, adding a "blockbuster" category is a way of getting younger fanboys engaged, thus upping viewership. 

However, they need to know it's much worse than that. What we are seeing is a mass public's shrug of irrelevance to Awards shows in general.

The thought of rich actors getting awards is just not as commonly accepted today as it may have been even a decade ago. The turbulent socio-political changes that have happened in this country have turned awards shows into these mundane, soulless experiences. Sure, decreasing the show's length from 4 to 3 hours will help ratings a teeny bit, ditto the "blockbuster" category, but father time won't spare the Oscars in the long-run. What many people are refusing to admit is that what we are really seeing here is the deteriorating relevance of awards shows.

Report: James Gunn's 'Guardians 3' script will be used, Warner Bros. interested in hiring him













Earlier this week Dave Bautista had mentioned that if James Gunn's script for "Guardians of the Galaxy: Volume 3" wasn't used then he'd quit his contract:
“Where I’m at right now is that if [Marvel] don’t use that script, then I’m going to ask them to release me from my contract, cut me out or recast me. I’d be doing James a disservice if I didn’t.”

Rumors coming from Omega Underground were indicating that Gunn's script would be offed and that Disney and their creatives were to write a new screenplay for "Guardians 3." However,  THR, is now reporting that Disney are indeed planning in using Gunn’s script, but that he still won’t be rehired as director.

They note that Gunn is currently in complicated negotiations with Disney over his exit. They estimate the firing might have Gunn exiting the mouse house with around $7 million to $10 million in his pockets, if not higher.

THR is also reporting that Warner Bros. is very interesting in speaking to Gunn about some upcoming projects, but that the director is not permitted to entertain such offers while exit negotiations with Disney are ongoing. Warner Bros, of course, owns the DCEU and it would be quite amusing to see Gunn jump ship and basically bring his meta style, which has been the blueprint used for most MCU films post-Guardians, to DC films. The DCEU has been trying to find a new look and style to better their product for the masses. Gunn might be that answer.

The Oscars Are Adding a New Category for “Outstanding Popular Film”

Related image


Scott Feinberg is reporting that the Academy have 
announced three big changes for the Oscars telecast, including the peculiar addition of a new category: “Best Popular Film.”

Yes, AMPAS president John Bailey and CEO Dawn Hudson are officially now trying to erase the importance of the Academy Awards by, as Jeff Wells so eloquently put it, "trying to adhere to the "short-attention-span dumb-asses who have long resented that the Best Picture Oscar is more often than not won by some kind of highbrow film that Joe and Jane Popcorn are either reluctant to see or haven’t seen at all."

This new category sounds like it belongs more at the Nickelodeon awards or the People’s Choice awards than the Oscars.

Does that mean escapism like "Mission: Impossible - Fallout" and "Black Panther" will stand no chance at being nominated for the actual Best Picture prize? Sure looks like it. You think 'Panther' director Ryan Coogler is happy about this? Of course not. Don't even ask about Marvel were banking on legitimizing their movies within the industry with a Best Picture nomination.

Coincidence or not, 'Panther' just crossed the $700 million mark domestically. I wonder what the coincidence was behind the Academy's announcement happening right after that milestone. Do they fear that "Black Panther" might be a major player for the Best Picture Oscar and would rather relegate it to a "popcorn" category? 

This is the Academy saying "No superhero flick, especially 'Panther,' should ever come close to the prestige categories that are the bread and butter of our show. We won't ever let that happen." Now, I am looking forward to the social media backlash, already happening might I add, which will surely lead to a heavy campaign to have Coogler's movie crack the Best Picture category.

This is also a "selling out" to studios, a compromise, by creating an additional category for the likes of Disney, Marvel, Pixar etc.

The Oscars also announced that they will a) be moving the ceremony up to February 9th, two weeks earlier than usual, this makes the nominating period very short, and b) many of the tech categories will be relegated to off-air awards-giving. If you're a fan of the sound editing category then that's a major bummer for you. 

The Oscar's sink to new ratings lows every year, and Marvel, the industry's tentpole company, is barely, if ever, recognized by them, this is was a no-brainer, capitalist-oriented decision by the Academy today and know what? I don't think it'll make a cinch of a difference.