
Bertolucci is a legendary director whose made delivered such masterpieces as "The Conformist," "The Dreamers," and won the Best picture and Director Oscars for 1987's "The Last Emperor."
Netflix and Lionsgate are teaming up on “Fairytale in New York,” a new action thriller starring Aaron Pierre, with “Sisu” helmer Jalmari Helander directing. Netflix will distribute and Lionsgate will produce.
Borgli and Robbie had been talking about her starring in his next film, and she's now committed to shooting it sometime in 2027, which means it will likely come out in 2028.
In the “doc,” Seyfried appears in the dramatized reenactments of moments that were never filmed. Is that a performance or a documentary device? The awards bodies can't agree.
I mentioned that French audiences have been rating “Ebenezer” highly. It has a 4 on AlloCiné, which is roughly an A/A- CinemaScore. Well, last night's PostTrak for U.S. audiences was just as good, with 4.5 stars.
This year’s 12th edition of the Scary Movies festival at Film at Lincoln Center premiered Ari Aster’s extended version of “Midsommar” this past Saturday.


With talk of "Marvel fatigue" coming from the mouth of James Cameron last week, Marvel Studios proved that fatigue wasn't nearing and that excitement was at a record high for its film. Case in point, “Avengers: Infinity War” which now owns the best opening weekend of all time.
Weekend estimates have the 3-day-opening of ‘Infinity War’ at $250 million. Yikes. “Star Wars: The Force Awakens” held the previous record ($247.96 million). I mean, there's a reason why people have said that "Infinity War" is a groundbreaking event, it really is, the film might have been given a mixed review by yours truly, but you can't deny the force of nature that is the film's popularity and how it took 11 years to finally arrive to it.
Its $39 million at Thursday night “previews” wasn’t a record, a Friday total of $106 million was the second-best single-day in box office history. However, Saturday's total of $83 million was what put it over the edge and beat previous Saturday record-holder “Jurassic World” ($69.6 million). Estimates for Sunday are at $61 million, the previous record is of $60.5 million (‘The Force Awakens’).
“Avengers: Infinity War” had a global $630 million weekend. That number defeated the previous record holder of $541.9 million set last year by “The Fate of the Furious.” And that's without even opening in two of the biggest overseas markets, China and Russia.
‘Infinity War’ looks like it has a shot at besting the numbers of this year's other Marvel juggernaut, “Black Panther,” but you can probably scratch it off surpassing "The Force Awakens" which currently sits at a $960M domestic box-office total.
“Black Panther,” in fact, had a major "Infinity War" boost this weekend as, on its 11th weekend, the film actually jumped from the #8 spot to #5, amassing a total of $4.4 million. Marvel Studios had 2 films in the Top 5. Never has a franchise been able to do that. ‘Panther’ now has a domestic total of $688 million.
1. Avengers: Infinity War — $250M (Debut)
2. A Quiet Place — $10.65M ($148M Overall)
3. I Feel Pretty — $8.1M ($29.6M)
4. Rampage — $7.1M ($77.9M)
5. Black Panther — $4.4M ($688M)
6. Super Troopers 2 — $3.6M ($22.1M)
7. Truth or Dare — $3.2M ($35.3M)
8. Blockers — $2.9M ($53.2M)
9. Ready Player One — $2.4M ($130M)
10. Traffik — $1.6M ($6.75M)
At the Tribeca Film Festival, a discussion/interview was held yesterday between moderator Dick Cavett and director Alexander Payne, who had interesting words when it came to his commercial bomb “Downsizing,” which also received the worst reviews of Payne’s 20-year career as a director.
Thanks to Michael Nordine's IndieWire story on the event, we know that Payne described the making of “Downsizing” as “difficult on every level — writing, financing, editing.” Payne also “addressed the lukewarm reviews it [received after] opening late last year, suggesting that its ambitious narrative may have been too much to fit into the framework of a single film.”
The film's reception came as a bit of a shock, especially after being toasted in Venice before having a much milder reaction at TIFF. It also broke Payne's streak of critical hits which started with his first film 1996's abortion satire "Citizen Ruth," which then lead to 1999's scathing political satire "Election," the Jack Nicholson led triumph of "About Schmidt" in 2002, the wine-romance, and best movie of 2004, "Sideways," 2011's "The Descendants," and 2013's black and white masterpiece "Nebraska."
The problem with "Downsizing" lied in how brilliant the first half was. The second half suffered, especially because it veered off its main concept and went into an ecological one instead. Wiig completely disappears from the film. Christoph Waltz' rowdy neighbor has nothing to do with the themes of the film. I also found the Asian character, played by Hong Chau, incredibly annoying and a racist caricature. In other words, the idea of the film was great but Payne didn't follow through.
You can read more of my thoughts on "Downsizing" in my TIFF review of the film, dated 9.27.17 [HERE]
I wouldn't say I "love" Real Time With Bill Maher, a weekly, politically-incorrect show from the comedian, that has garnered an audience and critical applause over its 14 year-run on HBO.
I always admired and respected Maher, but I do find that, as he was always a figure that would be ahead of the curve, always in the know as to what was going on and where the truth lied in many cases, his demeanor ever since the Trump presidency has been suspect and he's become a shell of himself.
I can tell you this, folks, if he continues to ratchet up Russia conspiracies it will end with me swinging my guitar on the TV screen. I mean, enough already, and, also, what was the deal with his support for Hilary Clinton? He was criticizing her every week, was a proud Bernie supporter, who was screwed by the DNC by the way, and then his brain switched to Hilary isn't an ideal candidate but she's the right candidate to vote for when compared to Trump, Jesus. Was she really, though? I was with Bernie from the start, I also think now he's just lost his marbles and shouldn't run, all hail Elizabeth Warren!
Nevertheless, when Maher is "on" he truly is "on." Such as last week when he had philosopher Jordan Peterson on his show, Peterson has been vilified by the left as an alt-right thinker, but he really isn't, like any philosopher, he doesn't adhere to any cubicles, he doesn't choose the options the powers that be want you to choose, and so, it was refreshing to see Maher and Peterson hit it off.
This week Maher expressed skepticism over the #MeToo movement. He interviewed none other than Ronan Farrow, recent Pulitzer Prize winner for his investigative reporting on Harvey Weinstein, and basically the kickstart of #MeToo. Maher asked Farrow whether people like Aziz Ansari, Al Franken, and Garrison Keillor deserved the guillotine as much a Harvey, the obvious answer is NO, and whether we have gone too far with this movement shifting towards mob mentality:
“These were the big fish. These were the really bad people,” Maher said of Bill Cosby and others. “Do you think there’s an excess in the movement that is causing backlash that’s hurting it? I’m thinking of people like Al Franken, Aziz Ansari, Garrison Keillor.”
Farrow's response: “our culture has actually been pretty good, on the whole, about self-regulating.” He then turned to the example of Ansari: “I don’t think anyone saw that and said, ‘Oh, he’s Harvey Weinstein. This is a multiple rapist.”
“No, but he lost a lot,” Maher replied. “He’s not around anymore…I don’t think his show is on anymore.” (Maher is incorrect in this case, as “Master of None” has not been canceled.) “I think he suffered a lot from it.”
Of course, I'm siding with Maher on this. Our culture has destroyed Ansari. Farrow, as the spokesperson for MeToo, isn't going to say anything positive about Ansari. Why would he? Hypocrisy is the name of the game with Farrow, who isn't innocent either in the witch-hunting game. I'm sure you know, his dad is Woody Allen and Farrow has sent daddy to the wolves countless times, siding with Mommy Mia despite there being enough evidence to have doubt about the whole affair.
Javier Bardem's defense of the director last week comes after celebrities such as Cate Blanchett, Diane Keaton, and Alec Baldwin refused to adhere to mob-fandom and condemn Allen, a director they've all worked with in past films. I assume they have read enough about the case to raise their own conspicuous doubts. If you are the kind of person that is open-minded and would rather inform his or herself rather than be lazy and just trust the fake news, then, please, do yourself a favor, and read Robert Weide's excellent dissections of Allen vs Farrow which were posted on 12.13.17, 5.30.16, and, most recently, 1.14.18.
James Cameron has been fairly outspoken about the current state of American cinema, especially the last week when he said we are reaching "Marvel fatigue." In past 12 months, James Cameron lambasted "The Force Awakens" as a film that "lacked imagination," and he also criticized "Wonder Woman" for being "a step backward."
Now, on its 50th birthday, he's talking 2001: Space Odyssey," and his thoughts on the Kubrick classic are more eloquent than any of his other diatribes. To Cameron, the film is a work of art but easier to admire than to love:
“It’s not a film that I like; it’s a film that I love. When I say I don’t like it, it’s that I don’t like the feel of the film. I don’t like its sterility. I like a film with a little more emotional balls, just as a movie, to get involved in. But as a work of art, I love it. It had an had an enormous, enormous impact on me, at a certain point.” — James Cameron speaking about 2001: A Space Odyssey in a 4.26 Toronto Star interview by Peter Howell.
I understand what Cameron says there, but "2001" is the reason why I love cinema the way I do. It pushed boundaries and made us view the screen in such uniquely progressive and different ways.
A New Yorker piece by Dan Chiasson entitled “2001: A Space Odyssey”: What It Means, and How It Was Made" (4.23.18) basically explains how hipsters in 1968 saved the Kubrick masterpiece from box-office infamy. I've heard stories of how the peace and love movement took Kubrick's film as their own ("Dig that time-warp, man") but Chiasson really goes in-depth with the hysteria that was occurring in '68, just a year after the "summer of love" happened, and a year before Charles Manson would doom the movement.
I wrote in 4.5.18, in a post called "2001: A Space Odyssey" is 50 years old today":
"A big studio film such a "2001 A Space Odyssey" could only be made in 1968, no other year, or decade, would have had a studio bank on this kind of big-budgeted, ambitious, and bold artistic statement. It redefined the way we saw cinema in a way that easily makes it the best, and most important American film of the last 50 years. It was filmed in 1967, during the "Summer of Love." Counterculture and LSD were at the forefront of mainstream art. Kubrick took this opportunity, the open-mindedness of a changing America, to make a movie that stood the chance of being accepted on its own unique terms. There is no other year where this could happen again."
"In other words, Kubrick’s film fit perfectly with the avant-garde movement of the period, the counter-cultural movement took it as its own, with even John Lennon uttering, “‘2001’? I see it every week.” And so, much to the surprise of the studio and the entire industry, "2001" became a movie event and the top grossing film at the box-office that year."
Chickens run amok! What better way to start my morning than to learn the news that StudioCanal and Pathe are both on board for the follow-up to the 2000 animated treat 'Chicken Run," the most successful stop-motion animated feature ever, grossing $106 million in the U.S. and $225 million worldwide.
If you remember, Mel Gibson voiced the leader of a flock of feathered birds trying to get out of the horrid conditions at their farm. If time ran out they were going to be chicken pie, which is actually what the evil farmers in the film make out of the chickens. It was "The Great Escape" poultry style, with an added dash of British wit. How can you go wrong with that? Gibson worked up his charm and stop-motion animation filmmaker extraordinaires Peter Lord and Nick Park had a blast creating visual miracles with the animation.
Aardman Animations are officially working on the sequel. Peter Lord is relinquishing directing duties and will be executive producing. Sam Fell, director of ParaNorman and Aardman's own Flushed Away in 2006, is supposed to direct. No word on why Nick Park has no part in this endeavor.
No release date as of yet but, suffice to say, we're excited for the chickens to come back home to roost. I know, lame.
NOTE- A round of applause for the green, orange and red lights on the floor at center stage of the Live Aid photo. They really made the difference on that performance.
SOURCE: The above are scanned pictures from the upcoming issue of Empire Magazine.
20th Century Fox’s Freddie Mercury biopic “Bohemian Rhapsody” is reportedly done shooting but still has no director, no really. Reports had star Rami Malek, who plays late Queen Front-man Freddy Mercury, clashing with director Bryan Singer and then production halting when Singer went AWOL from the London set. Singer was eventually fired, and then two days later was, finally, after years of stories, hit with a sexual assault lawsuit.
His replacement was Dexter Fletcher (“Eddie the Eagle”) but he was not in Vegas this week to promote the film at CinemaCon. Fox decided not to mention who would take director's credit for the film, but had the confidence to promote the film regardless. That's how much confidence they have in it.
Rami Malek at CinemaCon Rob Latour/REX/Shutterstock Producer Graham King was emotional when introducing Malek and the film, saying, “This has been the best part of 10 years in the making.”
Malek: “When I got this role, I thought, ‘Oh my God, this could be a career-defining performance.’ And about two minutes later, I thought, ‘This could be a career killer.'
As an actor, you look at the humanity of someone, the struggles that he overcame throughout his life. Throughout the course of the film, you’ll learn so much about him that gives the way he sings the music and plays that music — it fills it with pain and beauty.”
Malek also said Mercury was “the greatest performer that has existed.” I would think he's up there, but Bruce Springsteen and the E Street Band are my choice.
“Bohemian Rhapsody” will be in theaters November 2.
I haven't watched The Simpsons since, oh gosh I don't know, Season 11, I think? It's now on its 25th season, but, goddammit if that stretch they had between 1990-2000 wasn't one of the finest in TV history, right up there with Seinfeld, The Sopranos and Breaking Bad.
The general consensus is that there was one episode in which everything changed, and that was "The Principal And The Pauper," (Season 9) where we learn that Principal Skinner isn't actually Principal Skinner at all, but is actually an imposter, completely rewriting years and years of back-story for characters we've known and loved. Some believe the Frank Grimes episode of Season eight was the downfall. Who know, all I know is that the show changed when many of its core writers left.
However, over the past few weeks, there has been a lot of debate over the character of Apu. You see folks, we live in an age when social media is the mainstream filter to bitch and moan about things we wouldn't have bitched and moaned about in the '90s. The gist of it is that the "problematic nature" of Apu, brought to light by a ridiculous documentary called “The Problem with Apu,” has had Simpsons' creators and Hank Azaria, who voices Apu, in a bit of a fender-bender.
It didn't help that the show all but brushed the issue and mocked it in a recent episode. No surprise, SJW’s all over social media were none-too-pleased.
Azaria, must suck to be him at the moment,was interviewed by Stephen Colbert, and tried to be as politically-correct about the controversy, claiming he understands it and how his mindset over the character has changed because of it. Blah.
“I have given this a lot of thought, and as I say my eyes have been opened. I think the most important thing is we have to listen to South Asian people, Indian people in this country when they talk about what they feel, how they think about this character, and what their American experience of it has been,” said Azaria.
“Listening to voices means inclusion in the writer’s room. I really want to see Indians, South Asian writers in the room. Not in a token way, but genuinely informing whatever new direction this character may take. Including how it is voiced, or not voiced,” he continued.
"I’m perfectly willing and happy to step aside,” Azaria said. “Or help transition it into something new. I really hope that’s what ‘The Simpsons’ does, it not only makes sense, but it just feels like the right thing to do to me.”Oh, gimme a break.
Filmmaker and comedian Hari Kondabolu, who created the film “The Problem with Apu” tweeted his approval to Azaria's comments. “Thank you, @HankAzaria. I appreciate what you said & how you said it.”
You know what The Simpsons should do? Nothing. Nada. Zilch.The idea of a white man voicing an Indian character that runs a convenience store seems to be triggering a lot of sensitive and, let me say it, weak people.
Want to know the hypocrisy of the situation? Half the Indian comedians out there today speak like Apu. Apparently they like the stereotype only when there is no convenience store involved and the voice actor isn't white. Do you think half those Indian comics would be successful if they weren't exploiting those stereotypes themselves? Could you imagine if we started asking Indians to talk "proper English", to not be offensive to Indians?
Take for example Karan Soni, the guy who plays the taxi driver in "Deadpool," did the director force him to do the stereotypical indian cab driver schtick? I've met Soni, he doesn't sound like that at all.
Here's an email I received from an Indian friend:
“I won’t be watching the Simpsons anymore if this happens. Apu is a legend. Who are these idiots getting offended by a cartoon character?”
.@HankAzaria addresses the controversy surrounding the character ‘Apu’ from @TheSimpsons. #LSSC#Apu#TheSimpsons
12:03 AM - Apr 25, 201816.6K3,981 people are talking about this
“Star Wars Rebels”made us think that Disney and Lucasfilm would be taking a break from animation, well, think again!
Today, Lucasfilm announced that they will debut the next animated series, titled “Star Wars Resistance” in the Fall on the Disney Channel.
Lucasfilm has the synopsis going like this:
“Kazuda Xiono, a young pilot recruited by the Resistance and tasked with a top-secret mission to spy on the growing threat of the First Order.”
The series will take place right before “Star Wars: The Force Awakens,” but as you could attest from the promo photo above, “the beloved droid BB-8 alongside ace pilots, colorful new characters and appearances by fan favorites including Poe Dameron and Captain Phasma” will all be part of the show. Phasma and Poe will be voiced by live-action actors Gwendoline Christie and Oscar Isaac, respectively. Damn.
‘Resistance’ is created by the animated “Star Wars” mastermind Dave Filoni, of “Star Wars: The Clone Wars” and “Star Wars Rebels” fame. “The idea for ‘Star Wars Resistance’ came out of my interest in World War II aircraft and fighter pilots” said Filoni. “My grandfather was a pilot and my uncle flew and restored planes, so that’s been a big influence on me. There’s a long history of high-speed racing in ‘Star Wars,’ and I think we’ve captured that sense of excitement in an anime-inspired style, which is something the entire team has been wanting to do for a long time.”
The overblown “Avengers: Infinity War” has such high ambitions that its reach far exceeds its grasp. If anything, this 156 minute epic should be seen as a celebration of what the Marvel Cinematic Universe has accomplished since its launch in 2008 rather than any kind of coherent cinematic experience. During that 11 year period, Disney and Marvel managed to produce 19 films and consequentially ended up dominating the cinematic zeitgeist by make a mockery of any studio that even threatened to take its crown (cue in Warner Brothers and their failed DCEU).
Read more
Alden Ehrenreich's clear struggles with nailing the Han Solo role in the film “Solo: A Star Wars Story” are very well known at this point. After all, replacing Harrison Ford is not an easy task. Ford is one of those actors that made some roles look easier than they were. It was all about charisma with him in roles ranging from Indiana Jones to Solo.
The behind-the-scenes drama couldn't have been fun for Ehrenreich, and in a recent interview, he only made us feel worse. Speaking to Esquire, Ehrenreich said the firing of directors Phil Lord and Chris Miller, who were replaced by Ron Howard, was creatively confusing for him:
“They had a different style than Ron in terms of the way we were working,” says Ehrenreich.
He continued “From the first screen test on, we played around with it a lot. We tried a lot of different things, rethinking behind the scenes. That was yielding a different movie than the other factions wanted. I knew what I was doing, but in terms of what that adds up to, you’re so in the dark as an actor. You don’t know what it’s shaping up to be, how they’re editing it, so it’s kind of impossible without having seen those things to know what the difference [of opinion] was, or exactly what created those differences.”
Ehrenreich went on to say that he had issues with Lord and Miller. In fact, he actually learned they were fired through them:
“They said, ‘We were let go,’ and that’s it. They had mentioned there were some disagreements before, but they didn’t get into it. They wished me the best with the rest of the movie. On a personal level, it felt emotional, for them to be going after we’d set out on that course together. Because I spent a lot of time with them, and we had a really good relationship—they also cast me. But I think at that point, they were kind of on board with [the decision], too. Like, ‘This is what’s happening.’ That’s not what they said to me, but that was the vibe I got.”
He does like what Ron Howard brought to the table: “He knew how to navigate a tricky situation, and almost from the first or second day everybody pretty quickly recharged and got excited again about the movie,” says the actor.
“Solo: A Star Wars Story” opens May 25.
EXCLUSIVE: See the first photos of #DamianLewis in full costume as #RobFord in Toronto! #etalk https://t.co/VSY7MNiY1j
— etalk (@etalkCTV) April 23, 2018
John Travolta's career still looks like it desperately needs a second comeback. We thought it might happen with his excellent turn as OJ Simpson's lawyer, Robert Shapiro, in 2016’s “The People V. O.J. Simpson: American Crime Story.” Ever since then? Nada. Zilch. Zero.
His next project does sound fascinating. TMZ asked Travolta about “Moose,” a film directed by Fred Durst, yes of Limp Bizkit fame, and the actor full-on said: “Maybe my favorite experience I’ve had. He’s so generous and he’s such an artist. And he allowed me to create a character that no one else would allow.”
The best experience that Travolta ever had? In a film directed by Limp Bizkit's frontman?
“Moose” is based on a real-life that Durst experienced between himself and a fan. The film is about an obsessed fan, played by Travolta, who begins stalking his favorite action-film star, played by Devon Sawa (Remember him? From “Idle Hands” and “SLC Punk?”).
No word yet on a release date, but “Moose” has just skyrocketed onto my must-see list.
Ruben Fleischer, the director of Sony Pictures' upcoming Venom has an incredible cast at his disposal, star Tom Hardy as Eddie Brock, is complimented by Riz Ahmed, Michelle Williams and Woody Harrelson as Carnage.
Columbia Pictures president Sanford Panitch has stated that his Venom director, Ruben Fleischer, will be borrowing the style of some of the great body-horror filmmakers for his upcoming film on the ultra-violent Sybian.
Panitch says “Venom” will draw on the work of John Carpenter or David Cronenberg while promising “more pop and fun.” to which I say: Hell yeah. It's a no brainer to have both of these filmmakers cited within the Venom project. After all, Venom stems from a body-horror tradition which dates back to the days when the aforementioned filmmakers were wreaking havoc and breaking the rules in cinemas nationwide.
Fleischer hasn't really shown incredible directing chops over the years, but he did make the satirical and compulsively watchable walking dead, horror-comedy '"Zombieland" and 2011's rather underrated stoner/comedy/action flick "30 Minutes or Less."
"Venom" will be rated R, I'd be cursing my way to hot-rod hell if it weren't, and that should be enough to be a little more hopeful, as least when compared to the tamer, PG-13 rated, safe entertainment we've come to know as the MCU.
“Venom” is due for release October 5th, 2018.
Buried in Esquire’s interview with Alden Ehrenreich, written by Alex Pappademas, the actor lets it slip that his contract stipulates that he will make three Han Solo movies. Here’s how it reads in the actual article itself: I ask Ehrenreich how many he’s signed up for. “Three,” he says, then flinches, understanding he may have just created a disturbance in the Force. “I don’t know if that’s officially, uh, public. But—yeah.”
You didn't think I wouldn't point to the fact that Alden Ehrenreich's performance in the upcoming "Solo: A Star Story" was rumored to have Lucasfilm so distraught with that they decided to hire an on-set acting coach for the actor.
According to a report from Vulture:
“Lucasfilm wanted something very specific: copying someone else. Alden’s not a bad actor — just not good enough.” “You could see his acting became more relaxed. He became more Harrison-like,” the source says. “The coach helped!”
Yikes. The fact that he has a contract for three films must have sent Disney in panic mode. We hope the performance is well-met when the film is released on May 25th.

At Cinecon, Quentin Tarantino and Leonardo DiCaprio decided to just walk on stage to talk about their upcoming film, “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood.”
Tarantino, in his usual outlandish self, told the crowd that ‘Once Upon’ is “probably the closest to ‘Pulp Fiction’ that I have done,” according to THR. If that's not enough to excite you I don't know what will.
Tarantino went to say that “Sony and myself will be coming to the theaters with the most exciting star dynamic since Paul Newman and Robert Redford. It’s very hush-hush and top secret. But I can tell you that ‘Once Upon a Time in Hollywood’ takes place in 1969, at the height of the counterculture hippie revolution and the height of new Hollywood. Street by street, block by block, we’ll transform Los Angeles into the Hollywood of 1969.”
Of course, he's referring to Brad Pitt and DiCaprio. The latter went on to chime in and say “It’s hard to speak about a film that we haven’t done yet, but I’m incredibly excited…to work with Brad Pitt, and I think he’s going to transport us. I’m a huge fan of ‘Singin’ in the Rain’ — movies about Hollywood. As an L.A. native, having read the script, it’s one of the most amazing screenplays. We are going to do our best job to make it fantastic.”
Sony Pictures motion picture group chairman Tom Rothman, also on stage, added that “It's the best screenplay that I have had the privilege to read.”
Of course, the hype machine is very well what this is. However, ever since "Pulp Fiction" Tarantino has cautiously made sure to not replicate the stylistic and narrative aspects of what most consider to be his masterpiece. The fact that QT has decided to embrace and revisit that film and go back to it will make any cinephile excited and gleeful at the prospect.
The films that QT released post-Pulp Fiction all made sure to sidestep whatever was used in that 1994 film: "Jackie Brown" was based on an Elmore Leonard novel and was inspired by blaxploitation films, "Kill Bill" was inspired by Japanese grindhouse cinema, "Inglorious Basterds," was a revisionistic war movie, "Django Unchained" was inspired by Sergio Leone's spaghetti westerns and "The Hateful Eight" felt like a violent version of an Agatha Christie novel.
There’s no release date yet for “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood.”
Miike has directed a whopping 114 films and TV productions. Almost nobody has seen all of them, and if you have, you're not just a completist—you're a madman.