The social media embargo has lifted on Emerald Fennell’s Brontë “adaptation.” Reviews, from actual critics, will only appear next Monday at 12PM PT.
All I’ll say is: be very cautious about these social media reactions to “Wuthering Heights.” Yes, there will be those who absolutely love this film, but hate will be present too. There’s almost no middle ground when it comes to Fennell’s brand of cinema.
I mean, how can you take many of these takes seriously when one reaction is calling the film a “God-tier classic,” while another proclaims it will be a “staple for this generation”?
I expect this film to be a big hit at the box office — Warner Bros.’ promotion has been fantastic. A $50M opening weekend is very much a possibility. As for Fennell’s wish for her film to become “this generation’s Titanic,” that’s still up for debate (but I do wish her the best).
The fact of the matter is that—whatever its ultimate quality—we should be supportive of this kind of movie: one that banks on storytelling rather than IP, and on natural photography rather than green screen. Its impending success would be a welcome development in the current movie climate.
As for Fennell, she’s building up a decent fanbase, especially after the one-two, gone-viral punch of “Promising Young Woman” and “Saltburn.” With “Wuthering Heights,” she is destined to deliver the biggest hit of her career. Here’s hoping the film’s quality lives up to the moment.
UPDATE: Actual film critics Christy Lemire and Alonso Duralde have a more middling reaction to "Wuthering Heights.”
