• Critics Polls
  • Yearly Top Tens
  • Interviews
Menu

World of Reel

Street Address
City, State, Zip
Phone Number
Home
IMG_1284.jpeg
Sir Patrick Stewart, 86, Has Died

A real shocker. There are some people you think will live forever, and Sir Patrick Stewart was one of them. The legendary actor has passed away at the age of 86. We’ve lost one of the greats.

Read more →
IMG_1281.jpeg
Ken Russell's ‘The Devils' Extends Theatrical Run Indefinitely (!) After $3.3M Box Office Surprise

Nobody expected a 55-year-old NC-17 movie to be one of the surprise box office stories of the fall. Yet here we are, and this absolutely puts a smile on my face.

Read more →
IMG_1278.jpeg
‘Sunrise on the Reaping’ First Reactions Are Very Positive

Of course, we all know the rule: take these reactions with a grain of salt rather than treating them as gospel. Still, I will say that the film tested like gangbusters earlier this year, and Lionsgate clearly has confidence.

Read more →
IMG_1277.jpeg
‘Compassionate Release': Christopher McQuarrie's First Non-Tom Cruise Film in 25 Years Stars Denzel Washington, Taps ‘In Bruges' DP Eigil Bryld

Bryld shot "In Bruges," "The Holdovers" and "House of Cards." That seems like the right fit for what is a smaller, character-driven crime story, and a change of pace for McQuarrie after years of stunt-heavy theatrics.

Read more →
IMG_1270.jpeg
James Gunn Says DCU Batman Casting “Isn't Very Far Off” — Do We Really Need Two Batmen?

Right now, the cleanest path is to let Reeves finish his trilogy and bring in the new guy once the dust has settled. Gunn clearly hasn’t gotten the memo.

Read more →
Featured
Capture.PNG
August 19, 2019
3-Hour ‘Midsommar' Director's Cut Screened in NYC
August 19, 2019

This year’s 12th edition of the Scary Movies festival at Film at Lincoln Center premiered Ari Aster’s extended version of “Midsommar” this past Saturday.

Read more →
August 19, 2019

World of Reel

  • Critics Polls
  • Yearly Top Tens
  • Interviews

Roger Avary: Warner Bros Changed Kubrick's Original Ending of ‘Eyes Wide Shut'

December 11, 2024 Jordan Ruimy

Back in May 2020, I polled over 175 critics, asking them to name their personal best films of the 1990s, Stanley Kubrick’s “Eyes Wide Shut” wound up at #5.

I love how Kubrick’s final film, initially met with mixed reviews, is now seen by many as this colossal masterpiece. Christopher Nolan called it “the “2001 of relationship movies.” An apt description for a film that continues to reveal its depth-filled frames some 25 years since its release.

Yesterday, Roger Avary and Quentin Tarantino were on Joe Rogan’s podcast, but there’s one particular tidbit that I want to cover, unrelated to Tarantino, and having to do with Kubrick’s final film. At some point during the chat, Avary claims, as total fact, that Warner Bros interfered with Kubrick’s original cut of the film.

Avary claims that Kubrick’s intended version was meant to have a different ending, one in which Nicole Kidman and Tom Cruise’s characters agree to give their daughter away to the two men who are part of the film’s "pedo cult.”

There’s an entire thread that's been squashed in that film and that's the the two men who follow Cruise throughout the movie, that are constantly in the background of the film, who eventually in the final shots of the film you see Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman in that final scene in the toy store when she's looking at the Rosemary's Baby bassinet, which is totally Kubrick saying something, and the final line of the movie is coming up, you see those two guys walking off with the daughter. They're taking her away, [Cruise and Kidman] have given their daughter to the pedo cult. That's what was supposed to happen at the end of the movie.”

Avary further claims that “Eyes Wide Shut” originally had third person voice-over narration, and that Warner Bros refused to include it in the final cut:

I mean, I've known this for a long time, but I started really thinking about it over the weekend […] the film is missing a narration, it's missing a third person narration that was originally in the movie and that's because the movie was recut and changed after his death and they will deny.

There’s been quite a bit of research and writing done as to whether Warner Bros heavily edited “Eyes Wide Shut” after Kubrick’s death. Obviously, and to this day, Warners maintains that the version released was Kubrick’s intended final cut, but who knows. After production wrapped, Kubrick kept editing “Eyes Wide Shut,” for almost 18 months, and then he died.

Here’s more Avary …

Okay, so apparently he finished it. Well, that's the party line, but I think that [Warner Bros] changed the the notes, the closeups, the inserts of the notes, I think those are changed. It’s missing a narration, it's definitely missing a third person narration […] They couldn't say that Kubrick finished the movie because they hadn't done the recording of the narrator yet and so maybe they just kind of glued it together.

Further in the discussion Avary recounts an incident where Kubrick allegedly argued with executives about preserving the integrity of his movie during its screening in England.

There’s an incident where when they first screened the movie England. People who were outside — this is all secondhand by the way — of the theater could hear inside of the theater Kubrick yelling at all the executives, and saying it’s my movie you can’t cut it, you can’t f**king cut my film. Then he died just four days later

Warner Bros maintains that, despite minor tweaking, not a single frame was removed from Kubrick's film, and that’s despite urban legends stating otherwise.

A few months ago, when asked about the cut that was released in theaters, and whether it was the one Kubrick intended to be seen, Kidman didn’t even hesitate in stating that it was the legendary filmmaker’s final version:

Oh, yeah. He had been editing it for 18 months. It wasn’t like he didn’t have enough time. He was very happy with it. For him to show it to us, that is huge, if you know Stanley. And the Warners people were there. He wasn’t going back to the drawing board.

In the end, maybe Avary knows something that we don’t, but he’s sadly not shown any receipts to back up his claim, This is a conspiracy that’s been around for 25 years, that there was 20 minutes of footage that Kubrick refused to have edited from the film, and was only removed once he died. It’s never been confirmed, but boy is it a good story.

← Critics Choice Awards: ‘Wicked' & ‘Conclave' Lead With 11 Noms Each‘Kraven' 14% on Rotten Tomatoes; $15M Opening Weekend Eyed [Updated] →

FOLLOW US!

Newsletter Block
This newsletter signup form needs a storage option. Edit the block and enter a storage location via the Storage tab.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Enjoying World of Reel?

Get film news, rumors and industry stories delivered straight to your inbox.

Thank you!
No results found

Trending

Featured
IMG_9738.jpeg
CONFIRMED: Sadie Soverall Exits Brady Corbet's ‘The Origin of the World' Mid-Shoot, Lily McInerny Steps In Lead Role

Sadie Soverall was just let go after briefly filming on Corbet's new film — no official reason given. She had the lead role. Corbet has replaced her, last minute, with Lily McInerny.

Read more →
IMG_9642.jpeg
Ron Howard’s ‘Alone at Dawn’ Starring Adam Driver and Anne Hathaway Sets Christmas 2027 Release

This is the adaptation of the nonfiction book by Dan Schilling and Lori Longfritz. It wrapped production in February and has been in post-production ever since. The film test-screened a few months ago.

Read more →
IMG_9603.jpeg
Jeremy Saulnier’s Next Film Retitled to ‘Slayground,’ Current Runtime is 2.5 Hours, Plot Details

Jeremy Saulnier’s mysterious A24 project, formerly “October,” still has no release date. You’d think, given that it has been in post-production for almost a year now.

Read more →
IMG_9478.jpeg
Jemima Kirke and Alexi Wasser to Star in Woody Allen's Next Film

A few months ago, Deadline reported that Woody Allen's next film, set in Madrid and carrying a $14M budget, will be "largely English-language" and feature a "high-profile cast."

Read more →

Critics Polls

Featured
IMG_4965.jpeg
Fritz Lang’s ‘M’ Tops the Best Films of the 1930s, According to 100+ Critics

We’ve gone through the decades. The ‘40s ‘50s, ‘60s, ‘70s, ‘80s, ‘90s, ‘2000s, and ‘2010s. — all revisited, argued over. Now, here are the results for the best films of the 1930s.

Read more →
Capture.PNG
Critics Poll: ‘Citizen Kane' Named Best Film of the 1940s

The results are in, and according to critics, this decade filled with cinematic riches did not have a better film than Orson Welles’ “Citizen Kane.” Nobody should be surprised by this result. “Citizen Kane” changed cinema forever.

Read more →
Capture.PNG
Critics Poll: ‘Vertigo’ Named Best Film of the 1950s, Over 120 Participants

It was a closer race than anticipated, but Alfred Hitchcock’s “Vertigo” has topped our best of the ’50s poll, besting Gene Kelly and Stanley Donen’s “Singin’ in the Rain” by just two votes.

Read more →
B16BAC21-5652-44F6-9E83-A1A5C5DF61D7.jpeg
Critics Poll: Kubrick’s ‘2001: A Space Odyssey’ Tops Our 1960s Critics Poll

We’ve already covered the 1970s, 1980s, 1990s, 2000s, and 2010s. Now we have the results for the Best Films of the 1960s.

Read more →
 

SEND NEWS TIPS

Summary Block
This block is invalid. Please check the block settings and try again.
Featured
Aenean eu leo Quam
Aenean eu leo Quam

Quisque iaculis facilisis lacinia. Mauris euismod pellentesque tellus sit amet mollis.

Read more →
World of Reel tagline.PNG
 

Content

Contribute

Subscribe

 

Support

Advertise

Donate

 

About

Team

Contact

Privacy Policy

Site designed by Jordan Ruimy © 2026