Harvey Weinstein Now Faces Life In Prison, After New Sexual Assault Charges Emerge From Another Woman



Harvey Weinstein had surrendered to authorities in May, with the accusations on the former Miramax head honcho having to do with “rape, criminal sex act and other charges from encounters with two women.” 

Weinstein is currently out on bail, based from that arrest, with no trial date set.
However, it seems like things will only be getting worse for Weinstein as he now faces three new felony charges, which could lead to life in prison.
A report from Variety confirms that Weinstein was indicted earlier today on three additional charges, having to do with inappropriate behavior. All three charges have to do with an unknown woman in 2006, who alleged that he forced her to perform oral sex on him, an act that Weinstein has been accused multiple times of perpetrating on his victims in the past. 
So now, he faces another count of criminal sexual act in the first degree and two counts of predatory sexual assault. What does all this mean in terms of sentencing? If found guilty, Weinstein could face 10 years to life in prison

In case you are living in a rock, the Miramax boss had become the evil face that sparked the #MeToo and #TimesUp movements. He will most likely do time.
The full quote from the Variety report:
“A Manhattan Grand Jury has now indicted Harvey Weinstein on some of the most serious sexual offenses that exist under New York’s Penal Law,” District Attorney Cy Vance said in a statement. “This indictment is the result of the extraordinary courage exhibited by the survivors who have come forward. Our investigation continues. If you are a survivor of the predatory abuse with which Mr. Weinstein is charged, there is still time to pursue justice. Please call us at 212-335-9373.”

Jim Carrey To Play ‘Sonic The Hedgehog’ Villain Robotnik


Jim Carrey, who seems to be more interested in political painting than any sort of acting these days, doesn't really "do movies" anymore, and when he does, they turn out to have a 0% Rotten Tomatoes score (the forever delayed "Dark Crimes"). He has also been exec-producing the Showtime series "I’m Dying Up Here," which I've heard mixed things about and another upcoming Showtime series titled "Kidding," which premieres in September. 

Suffice to say the legendary actor, and I think there's no doubting he is at this point a legend, especially with the filmography he accumulated from 1994-2004, has shown no interest in pushing himself artistically for over a decade. Notice how I stopped at 2004 when speaking about his peak. No coincidence. After that, Carrey basically started having one misfire after another: "Fun With Dick and Jane," "The Number 23," "Yes, Man," A Christmas Carol," "Mr. Popper's Penguins," "The Incredible Burt Wonderstone," "Dumb and Dumber To," and the aforementioned "Dark Crimes." Yikes. There were two exceptions during that 14-year time-span, the underrated indie "I Love You Phillip Morris" and his supporting role in "Kick-Ass." That's it, that's all.

So, it is with great confusion, that I heard the news last week that Carrey will star in a "Sonic the Hedgehog" movie for Paramount and will play Robotnik, a villain in the live action/CGI adaptation of the hit Sega video game. Also starring in the film will be James Marsden and Tika Sumpter. "Hedgehog" will be directed by Jeff Fowler, whose only directing credits are animated shorts. 

Come on, I know you want to say it; Only Paramount would embark on such a random project.

At some point in his career, Carrey was really pushing himself artistically, a great example of his willingness to delve deep into character was his take on Andy Kaufman in "Man on the Moon." A behind-the-scenes doc titled "Jim & Andy: The Great Beyond," showed Carrey all but becoming Kaufman and, ensuingly, annoying the entire cast and crew for most of the shoot. It's a must-watch that shows just how brilliant and perceptive he really was back in the day. 

Maybe Carrey just gave so much to his roles that, like De Niro, he just wants to coast, that's fine by me. We'll always have the classics.

For me, the Jim Carrey acting hall-of-fame will always be these three films: "The Truman Show," "Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind," and "Man on the Moon." He should have been nominated all three times for an Oscar but didn't get the recognition he deserved.

Fall Movie Season: What to Expect?

Image result for "first man"

As this never-ending Hollywood summer movie season keeps chugging along, don't lose faith. There are plenty of Indie and Foreign films worth your time. Cinematic artistry is not dead. Only Hollywood is. I mean, please name me a blockbuster from this summer movie season that you truly thought was great. The closest we got to that was probably Brad Bird's "Incredibles 2" and even that film was disappointing, not even coming close to matching the original. The film I'm most itching for is Tom Cruise's 6th attempt at a Mission: Impossible with "Mission: Impossible - Fallout." Other than that, Hollywood will be stuck in a rut until Fall Movie Season. Telluride, Venice, and Toronto will be beaming with potential Oscar contenders. 

This fall movie season looks decent enough for me, but there seems to be something missing, a lot of these can turn out to be disappointments if the advanced buzz is any indication. The only film with actually no-holds-barred buzz seems to be Alfonso Cuaron and Netflix' "Roma," which was supposed to be at Cannes but you, well, you know the rest of the story... Shot in black and white, the film chronicles a year in the life of a middle-class family in Mexico City in the early 1970s as civil unrest looms.

Damien Chazelle's "First Man" has been screened in quite a few cities for test audiences and the response has been tame but positive. Who knows if this will break through come awards season. Ryan Gosling plays Neil Armstrong, Claire Foy his darling, in a film that depicts the first man-missioned trip to the moon.

Adam McKay's follow-up to "The Big Short," "Backseat," is the story of evil-doer Dick Cheney, as played by a ballooned Christian Bale and also starring Amy Adams, Steve Carell, and Sam Rockwell.

Steve McQueen's "Widows" looks like it'll be a heist movie with "some" political commentary. He hasn't made a movie since "12 Years A Slave," and the cast looks like aces, starring with Viola Davis and Liam Neeson.

Word is that Barry Jenkins' "If Beale Street Could Talk" is an extremely artsy take on the James Baldwin novel set in 1970's Harlem and having to do with a wrongful prison conviction.

James Gray's "Ad Astra" is currently set for a 2019 release, but rumor has it that the film is so good they are thinking of pushing it for the 2018 awards season. festival buzz will likely dictate that final decision.

Yorgos Lanthimos' "The Favourite" was, surprisingly, not at Cannes. The helmer of such controversial fare as "Dogtooth," "The Lobster" and "The Killing of a Sacred Deer" seems to have made a more subtle movie here, which has had Fox Searchlight delaying its festival presence until the fall for full awards exposure. The official synopsis: The close relationship between Queen Anne (Colman) and Sarah Churchill (Weisz) is threatened by the arrival of Sarah's cousin, Abigail Masham (Stone), resulting in a bitter rivalry to be the Queen's favourite.

Jason Reitman already staged an artistic comeback with "Tully" earlier this spring, but, supposedly, "The Front Runner" is supposed to be even better. Chronicling the true story of American Senator Gary Hart's 1988 presidential campaign and the ensuing drama that unfolded when he was caught up in a scandalous love affair, the film sounds like an old-school, by-the-books story, but don't dismiss Reitman just yet, especially when he tackles political satire.

And then, we have films that were supposed to be at Cannes but didn't make the cut. Claire Denis' "High Life" was rumored to be done just in time for Cannes head Thierry Fremaux to take a look-see and decide, but it didn't make the cut. Mike Leigh's "Peterloo" was very much seen but rejected. Bad sign. Ditto Luca Guadagnino's remake of the Argento classic "Suspiria" and "The Outlaw King," David McKenzie's follow-up to "Hell or High Water."

The rest of the fall titles that pique my interest:

Xavier Dolan‘s The Death and Life of John F. Donovan
Harmony Korine‘s The Beach Bum
Jacques Audiard‘s The Sisters Brothers 
Bryan Singer‘s Bohemian Rhapsody
Felix von Groeningen‘s Beautiful Boy
Robert Zemeckis‘s Welcome to Marwen 
Bradley Cooper‘s A Star Is Born
Marielle Heller‘s Can You Ever Forgive Me?
Nicole Holofcener's The Land Of Steady Habits 
Neil Jordan‘s The Widow
Thomas Vinterberg‘s Kursk 
Woody Allen‘s A Rainy Day in New York
Lenny Abrahamson‘s The Little Stranger
Olivier Assayas‘ E-Book aka Non-Fiction

Already mentioned:

Alfonso Cuaron‘s Roma 
Damien Chazelle‘s First Man
Adam McKay‘s Backseat aka Cheney
Steve McQueen‘s Widows
Barry Jenkins‘ If Beale Street Could Talk 
James Gray‘s Ad Astra 
Yorgos Lanthimos‘ The Favourite
David Lowery‘s The Old Man and the Gun
Luca Guadagnino‘s Suspiria
Jason Reitman‘s The Front Runner
David McKenzie‘s The Outlaw King
Mike Leigh‘s Peterloo 
Claire Denis’ High Life 

Congrats movie fans, you've helped "Jurassic World," one of the worst movies of the year, make close to $1B worldwide

Image result for jurassic world fallen kingdom howard
No, I did not review "Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom," Why? Because, frankly, I don't really have much to say about it. I haven't liked a "Jurassic Park" movie since the original and, yet, I've seen all four sequels. I have also spoken to many people that had no interest in this latest film whatsoever. So who were the people that actually bought a ticket to "Fallen Kingdom" this past weekend?
Box-Office Mojo is showing that the film has destroyed all competition at the week-end box-office. Hell, it made $17.5 million yesterday in the U.S. alone, on its second weekend of release. Worldwide it is at $826,454,064 ($222,225,335 domestically).
2015’s "Jurassic World" was no slouch either, garnering close to $1.672 billion at the box-office. What scares me most about the success of "Jurassic World" is mainstream audiences willingness to adhere this kind of dumbing down of, even, a mainstream movie. 



‘Little Women’ to Star Meryl Streep, Emma Stone, Saoirse Ronan. Greta Gerwig to Direct

Image result for greta gerwig

"Lady Bird" director Greta Gerwig has found a follow-up vehicle to her critically acclaimed and multiple Oscar-nominee "Lady Bird.". According to Variety in an article entitled Greta Gerwig Eyes ‘Little Women’ With Meryl Streep, Emma Stone, Saoirse Ronan, Timothee Chalamet Circling, Gerwig wants to adapt Louisa May Alcott's American classic, yet again. The last successful attempt was in 1994, an impressionable, likable film, starring Winona Ryder. 

Did we really need another adaptation? Probably not. But after Gerwig's success with "Lady Bird" she has the creative freedom to do whatever the hell she wants and "Little Women" seems to be what's calling her creative juices back to the drawing board.

Here's the problem. There already was an adaptation done last year. There are already two more versions of "Little Women" coming out this year. It's one of the most cinematically adapted novels. Shouldn't we start looking at other classic books to adapt? There is plenty of "classic," culturally relevant literature out there.

Gerwig was initially brought in to rewrite a draft, but following “Lady Bird’s” success, Sony amped up pre-production in order to woo Gerwig into picking this as her next movie.

A-listers Meryl Streep, Emma Stone, Saoirse Ronan, and Timothee Chalamet are in talks to star in Columbia Pictures’ retelling of the American classic with Florence Pugh also in talks to star.


The roles are unknown at this time as some castings are still being worked out. Sources tell Variety the studio is expected to test a handful of actresses opposite Stone for the role of Beth before the July 4 holiday.

Peter Berg and Mark Whalberg Team-Up For Their Fourth Collaboration Together, “Mile 22"

Peter Berg's films have been, just like Clint Eastwood's of late, very much attuned to the conservative part of America. You know, blue-collar, middle class heroes on duty, to serve and protect the great nation of the U.S. of A. "American Sniper" was a perfect Eastwood example, Berg's "Lone Survivor" went along those lines as well. I dug both those films quite a bit. Of course,there was a whole Left vs Right debate to them, about the heroic merits of the title characters. 

A film slightly adhering to the right is, in my books, not a problem and, in fact, very welcome, but what Peter Berg is attempting with "Mile 22" (Berg and Mark Whalberg's fourth movie together) is rather unique because it seems to stray away from the political and more into pure genre action filmmaking.

It doesn't look terribly exciting but you never know. Because Berg directed "Lone Survivor," and "Patriots Day" he is fine in my books.

“Mile 22” is scheduled for release on August 17.

Here’s the official synopsis:

In a visceral modern thriller from the director of Lone Survivor, Mark Wahlberg stars as James Silva, an operative of the CIA’s most highly-prized and least-understood unit. Aided by a top-secret tactical command team, Silva must retrieve and transport an asset who holds life-threatening information to Mile 22 for extraction before the enemy closes in.

‘Indiana Jones 5’ Will Miss Its 2020 Release Date, Now Aiming for 2021 When Star Harrison Ford Will Be 77.

indiana-jones-5-slice

According to Variety, filming for "Indiana Jones 5" was "supposed to begin in April of 2019 in the United Kingdom, but sources close to the production say that shooting will no longer start next spring and will have to be pushed back by months, if not a year,” because the lead creatives aren’t happy with the script. 

You want to know why the constant delays in production for the fifth Indiana Jones? The fear of fucking up, again. At some point this fiolm was supposed to be released in the summer of 2019, but now we've reached the point where we'll be lucky if it happens in 2021.

The rumor of Chris Pratt taking over Ford's role will not happen, it seems, and I'm all fine with that as long as Harrison Ford stops flying planes for a living and concentrates on being healthy and in-shape for the role.

The last Indiana Jones, "Kingdom of Crystal Skull," had its charms, but was nevertheless a soulless letdown. I hated it upon initial viewing but a rewatch, with tampered expectations, had me thinking it was actually a slight, but playfully entertaining romp.

Nevertheless, "Crystal Skull" was nowhere near as good as Raiders of the Lost Ark, Temple of Doom or, even, The Last Crusade. Spielberg admitted it. Ford admitted it. The screenplay was terrible, it took them almost 20 years to write something concrete and all they could come up with was a half-cooked plot about aliens and Nazis? Spielberg is trying to really make up for it with this next film, he wants to send Indiana off with a bang.

George Lucas won't have anything to do with this one, which is great, his screenplays usually stink. Another part of the reason the last Indy didn't work as well was that you had to suspend disbelief and pretend a 70 year-old Harrison Ford could pull off all those stunts. The first two films are still the golden standard, but can we conceivably buy Ford at AARP age still kickin' ass?

EDIT:  Harrison Ford was born on 7/13/42; he'll be 79 when the film is released.

Michael Moore Reveals New Anti-Trump Doc “Fahrenheit 11/9," and Admits He Cries Every Day Reading the News

Michael Moore, on 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert,' announced that he is teaming up with film exec Tom Ortenberg, to distribute 'Fahrenheit 11/9.' The filmmaker and Ortenberg teamed up for "Fahrenheit 9/11" back in 2004, a scathing inditment of the Bush administration's lies, which garnered the filmmaker the coveted Palme D'or prize at Cannes. The film also remains the highest grossing documentary of all time with $222 million in worldwide grosses

Moore showed off footage from the upcoming documentary, which will focus on President Donald Trump. He told Colbert that he "can't reveal too much right now" about the documentary, but the footage shown has him attempting to gain entry into Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach. He is shown being kept out by a gate at a door; "Just tell him it's me," Moore is heard telling a doorman. This has been a stunt that Moore has done in quite a few of his film including "Roger and Me," "Bowling for Columbine" and " Sicko."

Official synopsis of the film:

"Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 11/9 is a provocative and comedic look at the times in which we live. It will explore the two most important questions of the Trump Era: How the f**k did we get here, and how the f**k do we get out? It's the film to see before it's too late."

Moore admitted to Colbert that he cries every day while reading the news. He added, "the only way we're going to stop this is that we're going to have to put our bodies on the line," saying that the reason he makes films is that he "thinks there is a chance."

The filmmaker also found the time tweet a threat to Trump and Roseanne Barr about his upcoming documentary, saying "I know Roseanne. And I know Trump. And they are about to rue the day they knew me..."

The documentary will released September 21st.

I know Roseanne. And I know Trump. And they are about to rue the day they knew me... pic.twitter.com/vW81Gq7s1i— Michael Moore (@MMFlint) May 30, 2018

Best of TV so far in 2018: “Atlanta" and “Barry"

Image result for atlanta barry tv

As I write a mid-year recap about the best TV shows so far this year, I'm reminded of how 2017 was the best year for television that I have ever experienced: Twin Peaks: The Return, Atlanta, Big Little Lies, The Leftovers, The Handmaid's Tale, Better Call Saul, Better Things, The Deuce, Mindhunter, Master of None, GLOW, Veep, Ozark, and all this despite it being an off-year for Fargo. 

A few of these shows even towered over almost any movie I saw this and last year. However, so far this TV year there haven't been that many shows to celebrate. Hell, even the social pertinence of "The Handmaid's Tale" was gone and replaced by an odd repetitiveness that felt like it was written by someone trying to imitate Margaret Atwood's ideas and words, but sans the effortlessness.

We had one of the more consistent shows on television entering its fifth season, HBO's "Silicon Valley," still a worthy show but slowly losing its stinging sense of relevance and freshness. In fact, the show is starting to feel, gulp, predictable. If it doesn't find its initial sure-footededness back next season then it will surely become problematic for Mike Judge and company.

The sixth and final season of FX's spy drama "The Americans" was far superior than the disappointing fifth season. Despite a slow start, the season built on momentum and ended in the most subtle but beautiful of ways: a showdown between KGB agents Philip (Matthew Rhys) and Elizabeth (Keri Russell), their daughter, Paige (Holly Taylor), and the FBI agent Stan Beeman (Noah Emmerich) that was made their fool. However, despite the brilliant final episodes, "The Americans" landing wasn't necesarilly met with as much attention as many critics had originally believed the show would garner. Yes, there were brilliant moments throughout its run, but the show's legend will not necessarily be as "legendary" as some critics might think. 

Even the new shows lacked in excitement or overall discovery. The year's first season highlights included “Killing Eve,” “Counterpart,” “End of the F***ing World” “Cobra Kai," and, my personal guilty pleasure, "Everything Sucks," a vividly detailed take on adolescence in the 1990s. 

However, if any show was the surprise of the TV year so far it had to be “Barry,” you know, that show where Bill Hader plays a depressed hitman that decides to become an actor. It sounded abominable on paper, but the Hader/Berg-created show worked like wonders and, unlike most of the stuff we saw on TV, felt vividly alive. It was the best kind of dark comedy; filled with nasty thrills, a perfect sense of comic-timing and the kind of casting that makes rival agents soak up in envy. 

If "Barry" was a saving grace of sorts for new television, then "Atlanta" was surely the miracle that kept on giving as far as returning shows went. The darkly unpredictable nature of this show is something to behold. It speaks to us all as a society, as it tries to pinpoint the preposterousness of it all. The ludicrousness of existence.

As Donald Glover's Emmy Award-Winning series, the best show on TV, finally goes on break after an electrifying second season on FX, we can't help but wonder what the future holds for the willy bunch of characters created by Glover and his brother Stephen. After all, its focus on Earn Marks (Glover) and his struggles to help his client and cousin Alfred (Brian Tyree Henry) become a successful rapper with the pseudonym Paperboy was not only some of the most bizarre and minimalist television we've ever seen, but some of the most profound social commentary as well. Tackling issues such as relationships, fatherhood, family, success, racism, failure, poverty in such freshly new and inventive ways, every time an episode ended it felt like you were seeing the world around you in a whole new light.

The second season was darker, grittier, bolder and surely had, at times, some people scratching their heads. After every episode ended, you had to ask yoursel the same question "What did we just witness? What did it all mean? Suffice to say, the show's fearless ambiguity wasn't for everyone, and surely rubbed some mainstream audiences the wrong way in its refusal to adhere to classical narrative structures, but that was part of the riotous fun of watching "Atlanta." It was a show that also felt like a creative high wire act. 

Mark Hamill on his problem with Luke in “The Last Jedi": “Part of me said to Rian [Johnson], ‘but you know, a Jedi would never give up’”

The main problem that Star Wars fans had with "The Last Jedi" was how such a heroic and cheerful figure like Luke Skywalker could turn out, years later, to be the doom and gloom character written in "Jedi" by director Rian Johnson.

“There’s just such a huge gap between ‘Return of the Jedi’ and ‘Force Awakens’ – I had to really contemplate that,” Mark Hamill said in a new interview with IGN. “I said ‘hey, how did I go from being the most optimistic, positive character to this cranky, suicidal man who wants people to get off his island?’”

“It was a radical change, but I think sometimes being pushed out of your comfort zone is a good thing […] Although a part of me said to Rian, ‘but you know, a Jedi would never give up’. My concept of the character was that even if I chose the New Hitler thinking he was the New Hope, yeah I’d feel terrible, but I wouldn’t secret myself on an island and then turn off the Force,” he continued.

Alas, this doesn't seem to be a topic that will ever go away. It'll be part of Star Wars lore as an important moment that defined where the series was about to go. It's the moment where the millions of fans that prayed at the altar of Star Wars, lost their fate.

Why the third act of Moonlight prevents it from being a great movie

Image result for three moonlight characters

Moonlight was, quite clearly, the most critically acclaimed movie of 2016. There's no disputing that fact. It topped well over 100 critics lists and was instantly deemed a landmark of American cinema by many. Is it a coincidence that Moonlight's acclaim came a year after the #Oscarssowhite campaign? Of course not. Just like it wasn't a coincidence that "Birth of A Nation" was seen as the second coming at Sundance that very same year and was on its way to multiple Oscar nominations UNTIL a past controversy hit that film's director, Nate Parker, and the film, all of a sudden, was shunned and met with divisive reviews. Booted out of the Oscar race.

Moonlight's transition from festival to controversy-free release was much smoother. It was the film Hollywood would choose to go around to prove they are not racist! Any sign of Nate Parker was quickly forgotten by the mainstream press. Moonlight director Barry Jenkins was the new Hollywood "it-boy." And he is a genuinely nice guy. Having met Jenkins on more than one occasion, and having liked his first feature "Medicine for Melancholy," I can say it couldn't have happened to a nicer guy.

Medicine For Melancholy, was well-intention-ed, and atmospheric cinema very much influenced by Jenkins' hero, Wong Kar-Wai.

What can be said about  “Moonlight” and its importance to the cinematic world? Set during three transformative periods in the life of a Miami-based African-American gay man, the film is not only, for the most part, a mesmerizing journey into the “African-American experience,” but it also shatters cinematic taboos that not many have dared touch before it. This was the first major film I could recall to feature two black men kissing onscreen. Unheard of, but an incredibly important landmark moment. 

Jenkins split the film into three different time frames as he followed his protagonist Chiron’s struggle for self-identity in a society that refused to acknowledge his sexual freedom. The three actors playing Chiron (Alex R. Hibbert, Ashton Sanders and Trevante Rhodes) were all revelatory. Jenkins molded relevant themes in Moonlight. Tackling masculinity in ways that were both fresh and perceptive, he created a stylized and, sometimes, remarkable, film about a gay black man that goes through a harrowing childhood. The film also tackles Chiron's relationship with Kevin, a fellow student, and their one evening "together" down by the beach which ends with Kevin giving Chiron his first, and last, experience of sexual pleasure with another man.

The first two acts were invigorating, and uncompromising, as they gave eyes to story of a young, shy, black kid that is looking for individual acceptance in a world where there is none to be found for his "kind." However, this set us up for a third act that fails to deliver on the promise that was built up in the film's first 70 or so minutes. Now a drug dealer with an overtly muscular build and gold grillz, the vicious circle of black toxicity has been set. After making time in prison, Chiron has now become a big, muscular drug dealer, very much in the same way as Juan, his only childhood father whom he more than resembled now. The transition felt almost too facile and Jenkins' approach not very subtle. It's also dramatically fell flat and didn't adhere to the first two acts' suspenseful intrigue and fascinating take on the black experience. Instead of being this deep, heartfelt resolution it ends up feeling contrived and empty.

Even worse, Chiron's crackhead mother, as played by Naomi Harris, shows up for one final Oscar-bait speech expressing regret about how she was a bad mother. It's a scene that would have been destroyed by critics in any other setting, but because this was a film that had political and socio-economical resonance, critics turn a blind eye to it.

It doesn't help that Trevante Rhodes, who plays Chiron in this section of the film, doesn't look at all like the earlier incarnations of the character. Yes, he had a stint in jail and Chiron probably beefed up during that time, but there's no way I coulsd conceive that the little, sensitive Chiron that we knew earlier on in the film would turn out to look like rapper 50 cent a mere 5 years later. Yes, you will have the film's backers arguing back at you that the whole point of this radical transformation was because Chiron didn't feel comfortable within his own skin and thus built a shield of muscle to hide behind his true identity. Something that, according to many, men do in general to preserve their masculinity. I do buy that, but it could have also been done with a better actor and, hell, I'll say it, more subtle way. The overindulgence is almost too hard to go unnoticed.

And so, I have been asking myself, even two years later, why the third act of "Moonlight" just didn't do it for me, and with everything I have just mentioned that irked me most about that final section, I do find the biggest mistake Jenkins may have committed was not show us Chiron's stint at the juvenile detention center, because maybe after seeing that part of his life we would have identified more and believed the drastic physical transformation that happened in the film's third section. Instead, the time jump felt random and abruptly distancing.

Hitchcock once said

"Drama is life with the dull parts edited out." Jenkins hasn't learned that yet.

I will admit that diner scene between Chiron and Kevin was nicely done, I'll give you that, but despite the joys of watching two old friends catching up, it did still feel like a very forced gesture on Jenkins' part to have such an on-the-nose moment in his screenplay, a eureka kind of moment for the audience, telling us, no implying us, that Chiron hasn't forgotten the handjob Kevin gave him that one faithful evening down by the Miami beach, "I haven't been with another person since" admits Chiron to his lost lover.

Paul Schrader’s First Reformed Tops AwardsDaily’s First Half of the Year Poll of More Than 100 critics nationwide.



This is the second year I conduct this poll. Last year "Get Out" made 100 of the 117 lists submitted. This year, more than 114 critics nationwide were asked to submit a list of their 10 best movies of the year thus far. Leading the pack with the most mentions was Paul Schrader’s "First Reformed" with 70 votes. Close behind the Schrader were Ari Aster's "Hereditary," Lynne Ramsay's "You Were Never Really Here," Alex Garland "Annihilation," Ryan Coogler's "Black Panther," Chloe Zhao's "The Rider" and John Krasinski's "A Quiet Place."
The full half-year poll.
1. First Reformed (Paul Schrader, U.S.) (71 lists)
2. Hereditary (Ari Aster, U.S.) (65)
3. You Were Never Really Here (Lynne Ramsay, U.S.) (64)
4. Annihilation (Alex Garland, U.S.) (61)
5. Black Panther (Ryan Coogler, U.S.)( 61)
6. The Rider (Chloe Zhao, U.S.) (54)
7. A Quiet Place (John Krasinski, U.S.)(49)
8. Paddington (Paul King, U.K.) (49)
9. Isle of Dogs (Wes Anderson, U.S.) (40)
10. Won’t You Be My Neighbor (Morgan Neville, U.S.) (34)

My own list of favorites thus far extends to 15:

First Reformed,
Hereditary, Lean on Pete, Leave No Trace, A Quiet Place, The Rider, The Tale, Three Identical Strangers, Tully, Won't You Be My Neighbor, You Were Never Really Here, Isle of Dogs, Paddington 2, Red Sparrow and Game Night.

David Lynch Says More ‘Twin Peaks' Is “Calling Him"

Image result for david lynch 2001

"Twin Peaks: The Return" felt, for many, including this writer, like this generation's "2001: A Space Odyssey." It broke so many rules associated with television. Artistically, it quite simply put every "risking-taking" series to shame. Lynch's vision was so far out, almost feeling like it was from another artistic dimension. The mosaic of characters the legendary director presented to us was part of a greater whole, one that felt almost too hard to describe. As Agent Cooper finally found his way down the show's never-ending rabbit hole of colliding cosmos, he did so by finding a way to redeem Laura Palmer, in a way, even saving her life by going back in time and changing the tragic events of 1989. However, despite all that, the show's final moments were filled with more uncertainty than any sense of closure. Cooper's haunting question to LauraPalmer/Carrie Page, "What year is this?" and her final response, a harrowing final scream of horror, hinted at both of these characters being stuck in a black hole of foreverness. 

Lynch, as usual, refused to give us any answers, and many theories have surfaced over the finale, but he hasn't closed the door either on another season to "The Return." The show wrapped up in ambiguity back in September of 2017 but last night at Los Angeles’ Ace Hotel, where Lynch and co-writer Kristine McKenna were promoting a memoir she wrote, a fan asked Lynch whether he would ever be interested in continuing "Peaks" and Carter Page's story, to which he replied, “It is calling, but there are a lot of disturbances.” 

Whatever that means, it does tell us that he is thinking about it.

Over his 40+ years career, Lynch has refused to really comment or explain any of his movies, which has made them even more intriguing and mysterious. Sometimes the unknown is always better than the known. Despite all that, The Guardian recently asked Lynch to explain "The Return," the director's response was quite beautiful:

 “When you finish anything, people want you to then talk about it. And I think it’s almost like a crime,” he explains. “A film or a painting – each thing is its own sort of language and it’s not right to try to say the same thing in words. The words are not there. The language of film, cinema, is the language it was put into, and the English language – it’s not going to translate. It’s going to lose.”

Whether you loved "Twin Peaks: The Return" or hated it, and there are, sadly, some TV critics who do hate it, you can't deny that Lynch's instinctual artistry comes off as anything but inspiring for future filmmakers. He's a pure, unadulterated artist that goes by pure instinct rather than obviousness, which is why "The Return" likely changed television forever. It was the closest to pure, unadulterated cinema that TV has ever gotten to, and now it's time for others to follow. It truly is this generation's "2001," so maybe another season is not needed. Sometimes masterful mysteries should just be left unsolved.

Joaquin Phoenix’s Joker May Be Involved In Matt Reeves’ ‘Batman’ Films

Image result for joaquin phoenix joker
Earlier in the month in the article "Joaquin Phoenix to Play The Joker In Todd Philips' Untitled Joker Origin Movie" It was revealed that Joaquin Phoenix was going to, most likely, be the next Joker in a standalone, non-DCEU, movie. A film which would pretend, if only, that Jared Leto's take on the Joker in “Suicide Squad” never existed. And yet, Phoenix, always living in his own strange world, had no clue what Allocine was talking about when they asked him about the role, puzzled by the question he said:
 “What movie about the Joker?” he asked, and as the interviewer probed further, Phoenix simply said, “I have no idea what you’re talking about.”

God bless him.
There have been no official announcements from the WB, but it seems like Phoenix will most probably play the Joker in a DC movie. We don't know under what circumstances exactly, but Phoenix will either have his own standalone film and/or he will be part of Matt Reeves' upcoming "The Batman." 

However, according to Mark Hughes, from Forbes, plans are very much revolving around the actor to be the next Joker.
Appearing on the Superhero News Show, Hughes said a standalone Leto Joker film will not likely happen, but Leto might appear in ‘Suicide Squad 2’ or “Birds of Prey.” However, the bigger plans are for Joaquin Phoenix’s Joker:
“I think Joaquin Phoenix is playing the Joker in a standalone film, that will possibly wind up not being standalone, as the situation evolved with the solo Batman movies and the future of the DCEU shapes up. I haven’t heard anything firm, but I’ve heard certainly whispers from several people that I’ve talked to about that project… so now it looks like there’s going to be that project and I have heard from a few people that there is talk of if [the Joker] movie is really going to go forward and if it’s really that good, if we’re rebooting Batman anyway, he’s going to need a Joker. We can’t use preexisting Jokers. So, we either have Jared Leto showing up as the Joker in some sort of sequel movie, and a Joaquin Phoenix solo Joker movie, and then we have to have another Joker. Wouldn’t it make more sense to take a Martin Scorsese-produced Joker with Joaquin Phoenix and wait and see if it works out, then just cross that and have that be the Joker for the new Batman?”
So, a standalone Joaquin as the Joker film and, if it's a success, an appearance in Matt Reeves ‘Batman’ series. This is all very good news if you were looking for actual talent to steer the DCEU in the right direction. Bring it on. 

Johnny Depp says his $650M fortune “almost all gone"

Image result for johnny depp

“‘So are you here to hear the truth?’ asks Depp as [his chef] Russell brings him a glass of vintage red wine. ‘It’s full of betrayal.’

Rolling Stone made some waves the other day when it published “The Trouble With Johnny Depp,“ an interview with the troubled 55-year-old actor, which has the sleazy subtitle of “Multimillion-dollar lawsuits, a haze of booze and hash, a marriage gone very wrong and a lifestyle he can’t afford — inside the trials of Johnny Depp.”

Written by Stephen Rodrick, a journalist clearly on an agenda-driven mission, the interview must be considered a "hit-piece," despite Depp giving full approval for it. I mean, did any of the actor's publicists seriously converse with him before he agreed to this? Take for example this blurb from Rodrick: "During my London visit, Depp is alternately hilarious, sly and incoherent."

Rodrick visited Depp's home in London, but the way he portrays Depp is as a ruined actor, that heavily drinks red wine, smokes hash, and doesn't seem to realize the predicament that he's in at the moment. I can believe that. Rodrick mentions that “It’s estimated that Depp has made $650 million on films that netted $3.6 billion. Almost all of it is gone.

Their interview “goes on for 72 hours,” claims Roderick. The fascinating snippets of the talk are the details of the three-day, almost sleepless, binge of drugs, and alcohol the writer and Depp indulged themselves in as the actor was pouring his heart out to the RS journalist. 

When did the downfall for Depp happen? I would say about the time Depp split with Vanessa Paradis, his partner of 14 years and mother of his two children. That's when Amber Heard came into the picture and their now infamous marriage in 2014 occured. To say this was a nightmare for Johnny, and Amber of course, would be an understament. The divorce battle the two raged was hateful and nasty, with Heard claiming that Depp was verbally and physically abusive to her. This drama was happening as Johnny faced great problems, he was bankrupt. The guy was a big spender, still is; One of the more famous stories has Depp paying $5 million for his good friend's ashes, the late Hunter S. Thompson, to be cannonballed to the sky. 

About the relationship with Heard:

"His tabloid-scarred divorce from actress Heard is complete, but not before there were persuasive allegations of physical abuse that Depp vehemently denies. Depp's inner circle had begged him to not wed Heard or to at least obtain a prenup. Depp ignored his loved ones' advice. And there were whispers that Depp's recreational drug and alcohol use were crippling him."

About the legal problems:

“He’s suing The Management Group, run by his longtime business manager, Joel Mandel, and his brother Robert for negligence, breach of fiduciary duty and fraud. The suit cites, among other things, that under TMG’s watch Depp’s sister Christi was given $7 million and his assistant, Nathan Holmes, $750,000, without his knowledge, and that he has paid the IRS more than $5.6 million in late fees. (Most of the ire is directed toward Joel, who had day-to-day responsibility for Depp’s account.) There are additional charges of conflict of interest, saying that TMG invested Depp’s money for its own purposes and returned it without profit.”

I posted this on my Facebook:

Depp is basically going through a mental breakdown. It all started in 2012 with the potent mix of marrying Amber Heard and being very stupid with his money. As it stands, his last good movie was 2009's “Public Enemies.”

Ever since then? Want me to read you the list? "The Tourist," "Alice in Wonderland," "Pirates 4," "Dark Shadows," The Lone Ranger," "Transcendence," Mortdecai," "Alice Through the Looking Glass," "Tusk," "Murder on the Orient Express," and "Pirates 5." Yikes.

However, here's the thing, he's still making movies that are raking it in. Alice in Wonderland, Alice Through the Looking Glass, Pirates 4, Pirates 5, and Murder on the Orient Express all made a boatload of money at the box-office. He's also in the upcoming Fantastic Beasts sequel.

‘IT: Chapter 2' Has Begun Production, James McAvoy Confirms

Image result for mcavoy chastain hader it

Director Andy Muschietti's horror remake of Stephen King's clown opus “It” was a box-office smash last fall. It even surpassed "The Exorcist" at the top spot and became the highest-grossing horror movie in box-office history, nabbing more than $327M at the domestic box-office. Incredible numbers, so much so that a sequel was inevitable, and, as we quickly learned, was in the works only a few weeks after the film's September release.  

The focus of this aforementioned second chapter would be on the main kids, but all grown up some thirty years later, but Pennywise the clown still looming and torturing them in the creaky darkness.

Jessica Chastain, James McAvoy and Bill Hader will play the role of adult Bill Denbrough, and Hader would be playing Richie Tozier, the dirty-mouthed comedic relief of the "losers club."

McAvoy has now confirmed, via an Instagram post, that shooting has indeed started on the much-anticipated sequel:

Day 1 on IT 2. Glad you got the memo guys. #passthecheeseplease #derryordairy

A post shared by James Mcavoy (@jamesmcavoyrealdeal) on Jun 19, 2018 at 3:38pm PDT

"It Chapter 2" will be adapted from King‘s horror novel, which was about a group of childhood friends, that once battled a supernatural clown, returning to their hometown as adults only learn that same evil still exists. If fans were praying for casting to be well thought-out for this much-anticipated sequel, then their wishes have surely been granted. Chastain was strongly pushed as a fan favorite to play Bev and both Hader and McAvoy are strong, resiliently talented actors that will no doubt bring a ton of charisma to their respective roles.  Also, Muschietti and Chastain previously worked together on the horror film “Mama,” an underseen gem released earlier this decade. 

Bill Skarsgård will, of course, be back as the shape-shifting clown from hell, Pennywise.

“It: Chapter 2” opens on September 6, 2019. 

‘Star Wars’ Spinoffs Put on Hold at Lucasfilm

Image result for star wars spinoffs

Star Wars has been a hot-button topic the last year for many hardcore fans who are starting to doubt their faith in the sci-fi enterprise. Of course, enemy numero uno for these pissed off Star Wars fans seems to be Kathleen Kennedy. Pressure has been building up on the Lucasfilm head to steer the ship back to safe waters and regain the trust of many of these, now, gone rogue, fans she might have lost. 

Well, according to Collider, "Star Wars" spinoffs have been put on hold over at Disney and Lucasfilm. It looks like the plan might be to slow down the process of rolling out these films and maybe build back some of the hype that used to be associated with the release of a Star Wars movie. I'm sure, instead of releasing a film every year, Disney will start to roll them out about every 2-3 years, in other words, they think they might have saturated the market for "Star Wars."

The news comes amidst the disappointment of "Solo: A Star Wars Story" and, who knows what the plan is with this freeze, could even mean the end of Kathleen Kennedy's reign as head of the company.

Collider:

"It may be a while before we see any more movies like "Solo: A Star Wars Story" out of Lucasfilm. Sources with knowledge of the situation tell Collider that Lucasfilm has decided to put plans for more A Star Wars Story spinoff movies on hold, instead opting to focus their attention on "Star Wars: Episode IX" and what the next trilogy of Star Wars films will be after that film. Sources tell us that the previously rumored Obi-Wan movie was in active development, but those who were working on the film are no longer involved. It was recently reported that Logan filmmaker James Mangold was in early talks to write and direct the Boba Fett film, but that was before Solo’s release."

"Regardless, we’re hearing that plans to revisit this A Star Wars Story format have been put on hold for the moment. Initially announced as “anthology” movies, the spinoffs got off to a rocky start and haven’t exactly been smooth sailing. Josh Trank (Chronicle) was developing a Boba Fett movie around the same time Gareth Edwards (Godzilla) was prepping Rogue One, but Trank was subsequently removedfrom the project and Lucasfilm lost a film off its planned slate. Then story issues led to extensive reshoots on Rogue One that reworked the third act, with Tony Gilroy(The Bourne Legacy) overseeing the new scenes. And then of course Solo saw directors Phil Lord and Chris Miller fired during production, with Ron Howardcoming in to replace them and reshoot a number of scenes."

"In addition to Episode IX, Lucasfilm has officially announced development on a new Star Wars trilogyfocused on new characters from The Last Jediwriter/director Rian Johnson, as well as a new series of films written by Game of Thronesshowrunners David Benioffand D.B. Weiss. These projects continue to be in development and are not part of the paused spinoffs we’re hearing about. But Lucasfilm’s main focus at the moment is planning the next trilogy after the Abrams-directed Star Wars 9, which is expected to conclude the story of Rey (Daisy Ridley) that began with The Force Awakens."