Anthony Hopkins Joined The New 'Transformers' Because, In His Words, Michael Bay 'Is a Genius'


I honestly have this twisted cinematic theory that's been looming around my head for quite some time, what if, one day, in the near future, Michael Bay's "cinema" will be re-evaluated and he will be known as a genius that changed the game? I mean, he does have his loyal legion of fans that abide by anything he does. Many of them millenials, the future of film criticism? Also, Bay did invent his own style, he's somewhat of an auteur, his style relies heavily on a mash up of fast cutting, overtly stylized visuals and abundant use of special effects. I did love "Pain and Gain," quite possibly his only movie the last two decades having nothing to do with science fiction. Maybe he should focus more on those kind of stories, it did slightly change my opinion of the guy's filmmaking skills, much of the direction in that film is, dare I say it, really good.

Here's Anthony Hopkins' quote on working with Michael Bay:

“I thought, ‘This guy’s a genius, he really is,‘” Hopkins told Yahoo Movies last week at CinemaCon about his impression of Bay after meeting the director over breakfast to discuss the project. “He’s the same ilk as Oliver Stone and [Steven] Spielberg and [Martin] Scorsese. Brilliance. Savants, really, they are. He’s a savant. [They are] terrific,” Hopkins said. “They’re created by a genius.”

What has been overlooked, though, is that Bay's "style" isn't far off the great silent era of filmmaking, of course not as great, but in that it was important to make every shot completely dynamic to tell a story. Bay's films have always worked on that exact level, which is why they're so popular. Just turn the sound down on something like "Pearl Harbor" and watch it strictly from a visual POV you can completely understand what is occurring in the film itself without and of the sounds or dialogue, because of that dynamic shot. He also knows how to get the most flattering power shot for any actor he hires. Silent cinema courtesy of Michael Bay.

Carrie Fisher's Brother Says She May Still Appear in 'Star Wars: Episode IX,'

According to the 

New York Daily News’

 exclusive report, at the TCM Film Festival in Los Angeles, Todd Fisher, Carrie's brother, has said that Disney wants to bring back Princess Leia. Todd, and Fisher's daughter Billie Lourd, have given Disney permission to use "recent footage" for "Episode IX"

Here are his exact quotes:

Both of us were like, ‘Yes, how do you take her out of it?’ And the answer is you don’t,” Fisher said. “She’s as much a part of it as anything and I think her presence now is even more powerful than it was, like Obi Wan — when the saber cuts him down he becomes more powerful. I feel like that’s what’s happened with Carrie. I think the legacy should continue

I’m not the only part in that equation, but I think the people deserve to have her,” said Fisher. “She’s owned by them.

You don’t mess with this legacy,” he said. “It would be like rewriting the Bible. To me, ‘Star Wars’ is the holy grail of storytelling and lore and you can’t mess with it.

"Dr. Stranglove" depicts the U.S. President phoning Russia about an American bomb strike.



I love me a classic that ages like fine wine and, 50 years later, seems more relevant than ever.

I've watched Stanley Kubrick's "Dr. Strangelove" quite a few times now and it never gets old. The humour is subtle and sophisticated, something that has enriched it for today's way of doing political satire. Some of the action sequences still look very real, Kubrick seemed to be operation on a whole other level than his fellow filmmaking compatriots. As he always had between 1962-1980. There's a reason why his films we're never universally well-received upon release. He always seemed to be ahead of the game. That's why I believe he was probably the best director that ever lived. 

"Dr. Strangelove" is a philosophical statement about free will and the ways in which man, in his vanity, ignores the ways in which Nature dwarfs, controls and pulls man's strings. Relevant much? It's all based upon the idea that man is constantly "becoming" rather than "being", always trying and failing to satiate escalating desires ("Have you found satisfaction?" characters constantly ask). This desire for acquisition on the personal level echoes the film's larger political points."

Seinfeld Writers Reveal Abandoned Plans for Soup Nazi Twist



"Seinfeld" writer-producers David Mandel (""Veep) and Jeff Schaffer ("Curb Your Enthusiasm") spoke to Entertainment Weekly about the alternate ending to "The Soup Nazi."

Would have totally dug this ending. Very Seinfeld-ian.

“We joked a whole bunch about an end scene that would take place in the jungles of Brazil, à la The Boys From Brazil, where the Soup Nazi [Larry Thomas] would return to the other Nazis — the actual former Nazi war criminals — with his soup recipes,” says Mandel. “It was sort of half-serious, half ‘Should we do this?,’ half ‘We’re never going to do it.’ But it was much discussed. Going down a river and seeing lots of young boys with blue eyes from experimentation with the soups — it was a full coming together of soup and Nazi. Probably just as well that we didn’t do that one.”

[Twitter]

Terrence Malick says he's decided to go back to structured fimmaking and, you know, shooting his movies with an actual script

Terrence Malick gave a rare, in-depth Q&A following a screening of “Voyage of Time” at Washington D.C.’s Air and Space Museum (Thanks to And So It Begins…). It seems like Malick, who has completely ditched filming his movies with concretely written screenplays in his last three films, is go back to, you know, shooting with a script.
“Well, here was a script (in "Voyage of Time,") which was the evolutionary history of the universe [audience laughs]. And lately – I keep insisting, only very lately – have I been working without a script, and I’ve lately repented the idea. The last picture we shot, and we’re now cutting ("Radegund,") went back to a script that was very well ordered,” he said. “There’s a lot of strain when working without a script because you can lose track of where you are. It’s very hard to coordinate with others who are working on the film. Production designers and location managers arrive in the morning and don’t know what we’re going to shoot or where we’re going to shoot. The reason we did it was to try and get moments that are spontaneous and free. As a movie director, you always feel with a script that you’re trying to fit a square peg into a round hole. And with no script, there’s no round hole, there’s just air. But I’m backing away from that style now.”
What he thinks about his first two movies "Badlands," and "Days of Heaven."
“I think you’re strangely unconscious of change yourself, the way you’re unconscious of your own face. You’re changing but you’re not realizing you’re changing. But you hope that you’re on track with something; that you’ll keep changing. But those early pictures [of mine] feel strange, and five lifetimes ago.”

Star Wars Episode IX looks set to start filming in the UK this July



No word yet on what will happen with Carrie Fisher's role as Leia. CGI Leia? Who knows, but I'm sure they'll be keeping it very secretive. And still no trailer for VIII. Which is rumored to be released next week during the Star Wars celebrations in Orlando.

Yahoo UK has it like this:

"As expected, the ‘Star Wars’ team won’t be wasting much time in getting underway on the third chapter in the new trilogy. Evidence has emerged that ‘Star Wars Episode IX’ will commence principal photography this July at Pinewood Studios, West London. A listing stating as such has been posted at film industry professional site My Entertainment World. This comes on top of a casting call for extras spotted by Omega Underground in February, which also pointed to a July start date."

Star Wars Episode IX is going to be directed by Collin Trevorrow (Jurassic World) and is due for release in 2019.

[Yahoo]

WGA Announces That, If No Deal Is Reached, It Will Go on Strike May 2



“In the event that we are unable to negotiate a new contract with the AMPTP, a work stoppage will begin May 2nd,” the guild said in the letter. “Should this occur, writing for television, feature films and digital series will cease.”


Better not fall too in love with some of the TV shows currently airing, because the last strike killed some damn good ones. "Heroes," anybody? How about "The Office"?

Last time they went on strike, 2008, we had a real doozy of a movie year, maybe the worst since the 1930s, I remember it was a struggle for me to find 10 "great" American movies that year. A good example of the strike's effects is when they decided to shoot the new James Bond with a half-finished script which ended up being the worst Bond ever? "Quantum of Solace."

[The Wrap]

"Alien: Covenant" just tweeted and then deleted a photo of the movie with a major plot point



The creepiest part of this is the eyes. I don't know if it was intentional or if the art team just doesn't know how eyes actually look in an xray. Remember when movie studios would try to not reveal too much before release? Yeah, those days are gone. The original Alien trailer was full of darkness, dread, terrifying noises, the dead chill of space. But nothing about the alien itself. The marketing for "Covenant" as been the total opposite.

A new "Alien: Covenant" production still has surfaced on twitter, and was quickly deleted, of Katherine Waterston's character Daniels and it seems like she might have a little problem in her hands, or more likely in her belly.

The trailer for "It" but with the Cat in the Hat instead



This is so well-made that it deserves a post on this site. This mesh of "The Cat in the Hat" and the recently released "It" trailer strikes a strange balance between scary and hilarious. Then again, "The Cat in the Hat," that misbegotten Dr. Seuss adaptation starring Mike Myers, was horrific in how bad it was. Common sense that these two would blend so well. So far the only details I could gather about the person that created this highly entertaining trailer is that their YouTube ID is But Without. 

"Man Down" starring Shia LaBeouf film takes in just $26 at the UK box office - "I think we've sold three tickets in total," the cinema manager has confirmed



I saw this movie at TIFF 2016. Atrocious. It takes a special kind of movie to make just £7 in its opening weekend, despite having a decent star helming the whole thing.

"According to ComScore, though, the worst newcomer was Shia LaBeouf’s latest war film, Man Down. The film may have only been released in one cinema in Lancashire, but that doesn’t excuse the absolutely catastrophic £7 gross. (The Void opened over the weekend in one cinema and took £1,613.) Turns out, LaBeouf, along with Gary Oldman, Kate Mara and Jai Courtney couldn’t convince Burnley’s residence to visit the cinema. The film currently has a 15 percent Rotten Tomatoes score, with an average score of 3.8. Not exactly inspiring stuff."

[Independent]

"Avatar 2" Starts Filming This Fall

avatar-2

Last month I wrote:

"I feel like its come to the point that by the time this movie is actually released nobody is really going to care anymore, personally I have gone past that threshold and don't really care if the whole thing gets cancelled at this point. Cameron is talented enough, a visual poet with a tin ear in my book, that he should stop wasting a big chunk of his career on this franchise. He needs to create something original again, this is, after all, the guy that gave us "The Terminator," "Aliens," and "Aliens."

Cameron has basically shutdown the idea, in an interview with the Toronto Star, that Avatar would be released in 2018:

"Well, 2018 is not happening. We haven’t announced a firm release date. What people have to understand is that this is a cadence of releases. So we’re not making Avatar 2. We’re making Avatar 2, 3, 4 and 5. It’s an epic undertaking. It’s not unlike building the Three Gorges dam. (Laughs) So I know where I’m going to be for the next eight years of my life. It’s not an unreasonable time frame if you think about it. It took us four-and-a-half years to make one movie and now we’re making four. We’re full tilt boogie right now. This is my day job and pretty soon we’ll be 24-7. We’re pretty well designed on all our creatures and sets. It’s pretty exciting stuff. I wish I could share with the world. But we have to preserve a certain amount of showmanship and we’re going to draw that curtain when the time is right."


However, Sigourney Weaver is fairly certain that this fall she will be shooting some Avatar movies. In an interview with THR:

“We’re starting!” the actress excitedly told The Hollywood Reporter at a screening of The Assignment, held Monday night at New York City’s Whitby Hotel. “We’re starting training, and we’re starting — hmm, I probably can’t say anything. We will be actually shooting it by the fall.”

Christopher Nolan explains why "Dunkirk" is rated PG-13



"All of my big blockbuster films have been PG-13. It's a rating I feel comfortable working with totally. "Dunkirk" is not a war film. It's a survival story and first and foremost a suspense film. So while there is a high level of intensity to it, it does not necessarily concern itself with the bloody aspects of combat, which have been so well done in so many films. We were really trying to take a different approach and achieve intensity in a different way. I would really like lots of different types of people to get something out of the experience."

Nolan doesn't do R-rated movies anymore. His last R-rated venture was Insomnia, which some film snobs call his "last great movie," and that was 15 years ago. To be honest, I am a tad worried about this film getting a PG-13 rating. I believe every great war movie released since the MPAA system was installed has been rated R. This is obviously a tactical move from Warner Bros. to get a much broader audience and maximum performance at the box-office, but sacrificing artistic ambitions for that is not right, if that was the intention of course. Any war film that takes place in the middle of one of the bloodiest battles of the 20th century should get an R? We'll see how this pans out, I don't want to be too quick on the trigger, but the official trailer also underwhelmed me.

Dunkirk opens July 21st.
[AP]

"Ingrid Goes West" - One Of The Best Movies Of Sundance 2017 [Trailer]




This was one of the best movies I saw at Sundance. Over time I can see this being a defining movie of the current generation of click-bait, photo snapping millennials. Aubrey Plaza gives a towering performance. Matt Spicer also gives us auspiciously promising filmmaking debut.

I wrote this about the film for Awards Daily:

"If there ever was a film that dealt with our craze for social media in the most intelligent and assured way, it would be Matt Spicer’s Ingrid Goes West. Thee film has a career-making performance from Aubrey Plaza as an emotionally unbalanced, celebrity obsessed millenial (Aubrey Plaza) who decides to head out west and stalk an Instagram celebrity (a pitch-perfect Elizabeth Olsen) to the brink of martyrdom. It’s one of the best dark comedies to come around in ages and smartly updates the stalker genre for the social media generation. A perfect fit if you ask me."

Here’s the official synopsis:
"Following the death of her mother and a series of self-inflicted setbacks, young Ingrid Thorburn (Aubrey Plaza) escapes a humdrum existence by moving out West to befriend her Instagram obsession and LA socialite Taylor Sloane (Elizabeth Olsen). After a quick bond is forged between these unlikeliest of friends, the façade begins to crack in both women’s lives — with comically malicious results."
“Ingrid Goes West” opens on August 4th.

The Best George Lucas interview You Will Likely See. Discussing the Prequels criticism, Episode VII.



This interview was conducted with 60 minutes right before "Revenge of the Sith" came out in the summer of 2005. It is the most open and truthful interview I have ever seen George Lucas give. 

A few interesting quotes:

"There will be no Episode VII."

Actually George, I know this interview was way before you'd sell the rights to your baby to the "evil" that is Disney, but it looks more and more probable now that there will be an Episode VII. In fact, there will be "Star Wars" movies long after we're all dead. 

"There's going to be star wars movies long after we're all dead. Hell, we'll probably see a remake of the originals and the prequels in our lifetime."

He doesn't seem to care that much about what people thought of the prequels, which have all become memes due in part to Hayden Christiensen's wooden acting. I can respect that. After all, as popular as "Star Wars" has been, it was always a personal project for Lucas. Why would he care what others think when he's pretty much made these movies for his own self-satisfaction as an artist?

"The point is it's like if you paint your house white and somebody comes over and says that should be a green house well fine but I wanted to paint it white and I don't think there's anything wrong with white and I don't think there's anything wrong with me for painting it white, maybe it should have been a green house, but I wanted it to be a white house"

JJ painted the house green, right?

That was a great interview. Even though there was much to dislike about the prequels, I respect George Lucas's vision because, in the end, what we're watching is, in fact, his story. Can JJ Abrams say the same thing about his movie? Lucas created worlds unlike any others with the prequels, they were heavily flawed, but one must admire the way he has built up this world from scratch. It is even more remarkable when you look at how every succesful movie today is based on some kind of source material. What Lucas did with "Star Wars" would probably not be able to happen with today's blockbusters.

"Big Little Lies"



Just saw the first 6 episodes of HBO's "Big Little Lies," fantastic show.  I'm very much looking forward to watching Sunday's finale today and have no clue where it's headed, which is exactly what I wanted from this show. Its built up its characters as thoroughly as any drama of this type ever could. If anybody hasn't seen this show, it's well worth a look. The direction from Jean-Marc Vallée is top-notch, the editing is masterfully realized and the performances from Laura Dern, Nicole Kidman, Reese Witherspoon and Shaileen Woodley. SUBLIME. This is that rare show that actually focuses on the female voice; Their traits, their thoughts, their mannerisms, their unique sensibilities. Love this show.

More to come ...

8 Worst Superhero Movies That Bombed At The Box-Office



Not every comic book superhero adaptation gets turns into gold at the box office. While the superhero boom in Hollywood has made many people rich and turned many superhero films into massive blockbusters, there are exceptions. Most of the “failures” still earn back their ludicrous budgets and possibly get rebooted a few years later. The Spider-Man franchise is already in line for its second reboot after less than 15 years. But some movies, like this summer’s Fantastic Four, lose money for their studios and live on in infamy.

Here are the 8 Worst Superhero Box Office Bombs.


The Green lantern (2011)


This Ryan Reynolds film was expected to kick off a whole series of Green Lantern movies, but not only did critics hate it, so did audiences. Word of mouth was so toxic that it almost ruined Ryan Reynolds' career until he donned another superhero suit last year in "Deadpool," a career rejuvenation for the Canadian actor which came as a godsend to help his post-Lanter career. "The Green Lantern" was financially a disaster, its budget of $200 million could not be met at the domestic box office, it only grossed a scant $116 million, chump change for a DC juggernaut movie. 

CATWOMAN (2004)



Warner Bros. banked a lot on Catwoman being a blockbuster hit. A $100 million budget and a heavy marketing campaign tried to build up buzz for a movie that seemed like a surefire hit, benefiting from the recent boom in superhero movies. The film, however, was in development hell for years on end, with Michel Pfeiffer and Tim Burton first touted for the title role and director, as a spin-off from Burton’s Batman Returns. Then, Ashley Judd was rumored to step into the catsuit, and then Nicole Kidman had a shot. Finally, Halle Berry was cast, along with the signing of unknown, one-named French filmmaker Pitof. The critical response was disastrous, as was that of the box office, raking in $82 million worldwide out of a $100 million budget. Part of the film’s failure may reside in the creative decision to jettison the film’s origins in the Batman universe. Halle Berry played a character named “Patience Phillips,” not the Selina Kyle we know and love, and her version of the cat bore little resemblance to that in the comics.

PUNISHER: WAR ZONE (2008)

Image result for punisher 2008 600x200

The Dolph Lundgren-starring 1989 version wasn’t released in theaters, while the 2004 film featuring Thomas Jane didn’t really light the box office on fire, either. But it at least had more punch than the 2009 reboot/pseudo-sequel, War Zone, a film that was – forgive me for saying this – a punishment in its own right. The story goes that Frank Castle’s family was killed by a mob family, and Castle exacts revenge and kills everyone in the clan except Billy Russotti, who sustains very severe injuries that, even with plastic surgery, make his face looks like a jigsaw puzzle. The movie tackled the Jigsaw vs. Punisher rivalry, but, due to a poor screenplay that left out a lot of character development, lost much of the gripping momentum that made the comic books so good. A $35 million budget meant that the film’s $10 million worldwide box office intake was a complete and utter failure.

ELEKTRA (2005)


According to most comic book fans, Daredevil was stinker of a movie, so why did anyone think we needed a spin-off with Daredevil’s sidekick Elektra (Jennifer Garner) getting her own movie? Clearly not audiences, as the $43 million budgeted film only took in $24 million at the domestic box office. It’s not that Jennifer couldn’t kick ass in those leather pants (have you ever seen Alias?), it was the lack of care that went into the movie. After being killed in Daredevil, Elektra is revived and trained to become a contract killer who tries to protect a family that is hunted by supernatural assassins. A director’s cut was eventually released, which promised to be better, but it only contained an added 3 minutes of footage, which clearly wasn’t enough to save this poor film from entering movie infamy.

JONAH HEX (2010)

Image result for jonah hex 600x200

Jonah Hex was a great comic book. It told the tale of a facially scarred, but remarkably amicable bounty hunter who stuck by a personal code to protect the innocent – it was one of the great achievements for DC Comics. The film version? Not so much. A $47 million budget went into creating a movie for this iconic character, but something got lost in the translation. Josh Brolin, a great actor in his own right, was cast as the titular character, but the screenplay lost all the grit and guts that made the comic book a success, which is apparent in the film’s 12% Rotten Tomatoes rating. A scant $11 million was made, opening at #7 on opening weekend, and grossing less than $500,000 overseas. Too bad the producers didn’t stick closer to the original source material.

AEON FLUX (2005)

Image result for aeon flux 600x200
How could an adaptation of the popular animated heroine be such a bust? I mean, it featured Charlize Theron in leather tights and had a decent budget of $63 million. Aeon Flux was bound for success, but achieved far less than that. Theron’s skin tight pants weren’t enough to lure audiences at the box office, proved by a measly $52.3 million worldwide gross, and neither was the skimpy plot involving Aeon Flux as an assassin who is sent out to kill the Chairman, but unwillingly uncovers deeper mysteries. Director Karyn Kusama, whose feature directing debut was the excellent Girlfight, may have been better at directing personal, indie fare. The only person who came out of this project with half of her integrity intact was Theron,who recently kicked all sorts of as Imperator Furiosa in Mad Max: Fury Road.

THE SPIRIT (2008) 


2005’s Sin City was incredibly important for graphic novelist Frank Miller, making over $158 million and bringing in an influx of Miller adaptations to the silver screen, including the blockbuster 300. Miller used his new found Hollywood leverage to adapt a Will Eisner comic, The Spirit, for the big screen. Gabriel Macht played the titular character, a man brought back from the afterlife to fight the corrupt bad guys of Central City, yet there was none of the excitement of Sin City, and instead of feeling alive and exciting, it felt robotic at its core. Even worse, its $39 million worldwide box office take failed to reach the $60 million budget that was put into its production. The impressive cast of the film, including Scarlett Johansson, Samuel L. Jackson, and Eva Mendes, couldn’t even turn it into a success.

STEEL (1997)



In the early ’90s, DC’s “Death of Superman” storyline brought forth many intriguing characters, the best of whom was Steel, inspired by African-American folk-hero John Henry. The first red flag in this production was the casting of NBA superstar Shaquille O’Neal as the titular hero. “Shaq” had delved into acting before, with unfortunate results (ahem…Kazaam). The film’s plot was a string of clichés about Steel getting revenge on his old boss, who is supposed to be mass producing dangerous weapons and selling them to criminals … or something like that.The film grossed an embarrassing $1.7 million on a reasonable $17 million budget, which tells us that audiences were not so keen on Shaq as a superhero.