• Home
  • Interviews
    • Yearly Top Tens
Menu

World of Reel

Street Address
City, State, Zip
Phone Number
Home
IMG_3806.jpeg
Max Landis’ ‘G.I. Joe’ Script Not Moving Forward at Paramount
IMG_3803.jpeg
‘The Bride’ Crashes With 80% Second-Weekend Drop
IMG_3800.jpeg
Andrew Stanton on ‘John Carter’ Surprising Reassessment: “You Don’t Have to Whisper It Anymore”
IMG_3799.jpeg
Chloé Zhao’s ‘Buffy’ Reboot Won’t Move Forward at Hulu Despite Completed 90-Minute Pilot Episode
IMG_3796.jpeg
‘It Follows’ Sequel is Happening — Shoots This Summer!
Featured
Capture.PNG
Aug 19, 2019
3-Hour ‘Midsommar' Director's Cut Screened in NYC
Aug 19, 2019

This year’s 12th edition of the Scary Movies festival at Film at Lincoln Center premiered Ari Aster’s extended version of “Midsommar” this past Saturday.

Aug 19, 2019

World of Reel

  • Home
  • Interviews
  • More
    • Yearly Top Tens

‘West Side Story’ Spielberg’s Remake Sticks With the Formula and Doesn’t Reinvent [Review]

December 6, 2021 Jordan Ruimy

By all accounts, “West Side Story” is beautifully photographed, excitingly well-acted and brilliantly directed by Steven Spielberg. So, why was I left so cold when the credits rolled? One must ask the obvious question: why remake Robert Wise’s masterful 1961 classic?

You get the answer from the film’s very first shot, a close-up of a wrecking ball. Spielberg and screenwriter Tony Kushner want to reimagine the love story based on the 1957 Broadway play loosely based on Romeo and Juliet.

There’s always been a minority of detractors who were irked by Natalie Wood, born to Russian immigrants, playing Puerto Rican Maria. In Spielberg’s version, she’s played by Rachel Zegler, who gives a star-making turn. In fact, most of the casting, filled with wonderfully diverse dancers and actors, is an authentic reimagining of the original.

Then again, diverse casting aside, for all the supposed effort that went behind its making, Spielberg doesn’t really change much of the original’s story. If anything, this is a “West Side Story” for a generation that has most likely not seen the 1961 classic.

Maybe Spielberg saw the racially-charged paralells of today’s world in the love story between Tony (Ansel Elgort) and Maria (Rachel Zegler) set against a gang war between The Jets and The Sharks. The Jets are led by Riff (Mike Faist), and the Puerto Rican Sharks led by Maria's brother, boxer-gangster Bernardo (an excellent David Alvarez). Ariana DeBose is Bernardo's girlfriend Anita, but it’s Zegler who turns into this film’s true star, with her angelic singing voice and impeccable acting chops.

The soundstages of the original are replaced by on-location shooting and it brings an extra added depth of freshness, but the same story remains. Dance choreographer Justin Peck tries his damnest to recreate the original’s ballet-like choreography, bringing more grit than artistry, but Peck is no Jerome Robbins, who created one of the best-choreographed films of all-time 50 years ago.

Leonard Bernstein’s score is justly kept, so are the lyrics by the late Stephen Sondheim. Around thirty percent of the dialogue is in Spanish, without subtitles. Nice touch for yet again more authenticity. Ditto the famous rumble between the two gangs, but less affecting this time around.

And yet, there aren’t enough changes to warrant a remake of this magnitude. Spielberg plays it too safe. He’s aided by Zegler, DeBose and an excellent Rita Moreno as Valentina, the widow of drugstore owner Doc. Valentina is Tony’s mother figure. It's a well thought out role on the part of Spielberg and Kushner, giving the 90-year-old legend the chance to win her second Oscar.

Too bad then that both Elgort and Zegler have absolutely no chemistry together. We aren’t invested in their romance because we don’t believe the romantic connection they are supposed to have. It’s Elgort, in particular, who feels miscast — his acting wooden and none-too-passionate, at least when compared to his more exuberant castmates.

The artistry from Spielberg’s swirling camera, to Janusz Kaminski’s gritty photography to the immaculate performances keep you hanging on. However, Spielberg’s intentions seem misplaced here, his execution over-elaborated. It’s a technical triumph, but leaves you feeling with a shrug by the end of it. [B/B-]

In REVIEWS, Review
← Cannes Spitballing Etc.‘The Lost Daughter’: Maggie Gylenhaal’s Impressive Directorial Debut [Review] →

FOLLOW US!


Trending

Featured
IMG_3514.jpeg
‘Digger’ Test Screening Reactions Say Tom Cruise Is Unrecognizable in Iñárritu’s Dark Comedy
IMG_3484.jpeg
Denzel Washington-Starring ‘Hannibal’ Biopic —Directed by Antoine Fuqua —Set to Start Production in June for Netflix
IMG_3415.jpeg
Can ‘Sinners’ Win Best Picture?
IMG_3391.jpeg
Nicolas Winding Refn Set to Direct ‘Maniac Cop’ Remake — Starts Production This Fall

Critics Polls

Featured
Capture.PNG
Critics Poll: ‘Vertigo’ Named Best Film of the 1950s, Over 120 Participants
B16BAC21-5652-44F6-9E83-A1A5C5DF61D7.jpeg
Critics Poll: Kubrick’s ‘2001: A Space Odyssey’ Tops Our 1960s Critics Poll
Capture.PNG
Critics Poll: ‘The Godfather’ Named Best Movie of the 1970s
public.jpeg
Critics Poll: ‘Do the Right Thing' Named Best Movie of the 1980s
World of Reel tagline.PNG
 

Content

Contribute

Hire me

 

Support

Advertise

Donate

 

About

Team

Contact

Privacy Policy

Site designed by Jordan Ruimy © 2025