Christian Bale’s Dick Cheney transformation



"The Big Short" director is at the helm of this Dick Cheney biopic entitled "Backseat."With the aforementioned Bale as Cheney, the movie will also have Steve Carrell, as Donald Rumsfeld, and Amy Adams, as Lynne Cheney. Expect to see them at the 2019 Oscars. I'm particularly looking forward to Carrell's Rumsfeld.

The above picture seems to indicate that Christian Bale is going through another weight fluctuation for his role as Cheney. If you remember, last year Bale decided to leave Michael Mann's Enzo Ferrari biopic because he became worried that he wouldn’t be able to safely gain the weight. Telling the USA Today:

“I thought I was going to lose the weight I gained for American Hustle. I said, two months, flat, that’ll do it. I was 185 and I went up to 228 for it. And I’m still working that off! It’s almost six months later. Now, I know that when I was in my early twenties it would have been two months and that’s it.”
At some point, when an adult reaches his or her 40s they have to be aware of the wear and tear that has amassed over the last 40+ years. If you have fluctuated in weight, the way Bale has over his career, then you probably have an added concern about your heart, which can only take so many beatings. Just look at this graph:
Image result for christian bale machinist
It seems like any concerns Bale might have had with his health have gone to dust. Sporting a bald head and heavy figure, the 43-year-old actor has been doing press for his upcoming film "Hostiles." According to EW, to pack on the pounds, Bale stated “I’ve just eaten a lot of pies, so far,”  At the very least this can't be as unhealthy as going down to 113 pounds for "The Machinist," but it does beg the question, when will enough be enough for the actor?

Stephen Chbosky's "Wonder" is sweet and touching

Image result for WONDER MOVIE

Based on the popular book by R. J. Palacio, Stephen Chbosky's "Wonder" is a sweet, delicate but self-aware adaptation that remarkably sidesteps most of the clichés that a film such as this could have easily fallen into. It is the universality of the message that rings truest in Chbosky's film, that of accepting people for who they are and, most importantly, being kind to one another. It might sound all saccharine, but it is deftly told by a filmmaker whose last film (an adaptation of his own novel "The Perks of Being a Wallflower") also dealt with adolescent angst. 

Although it will remind some of Peter Bogdonavich's excellent "Mask," in which a boy also had to deal with a craniofacial birth defect, "Wonder" separates itself from that film by being its own kind of sweet-natured fable. If Bogdanovich's film was a grittier, more morose-filled film, Chbosky does not want any of that – he believes in the courage and strength and against-all-odds journey of his character.

The film traces a year in the life of a severely disfigured boy Auggie (Jacob Tremblay), who is going to school for the first time in his young life after years of home-schooling, courtesy of his understandably overprotective mother (Julia Roberts). Co-screenwriters Steven Conrad and Jack Thorne have adapted Palacio's book and have kept its core centrality to inspire with both humane relatability and an overabundance of real emotions. 

An Oscar-nominee for "Room," Jacob Tremblay, almost unrecognizable in makeup, manages to pass this tough acting challenge by playing Auggie Pullman, a 10-year-old wonder boy who has had to face adversity his entire life. Despite 27 surgical procedures, the facial birth defect he has had to shoulder on his entire, short life, has been a burden to say the least – so much so, that Auggie prefers to wear his astronaut helmet than to show his true self. Despite all that, this is as much a story about this tough little boy as it is about the resilience of his parents Isabel and Nate, (Roberts and Owen Wilson) who, hesitatingly, decide it's time for Auggie to join regular kids his age in the fifth grade. They know his new chapter in life will, no doubt, be filled with curious students staring and mocking Auggie's deformities. Nate is most hesitant, comparing the situation to sending a "lamb to the slaughter." 

The greeting that Auggie receives upon entering the halls of his new school is all too predictable, with bullies led by Julian (Bryce Gheisar) using verbal assaults to put down this sweet-natured kid, who expected the worse and gets it. However, there are also kids that care, and want to make Auggie feel at home. They know how tough it must be for him, and the conversations that ensue between them are touchingly rendered, in a way that feels like you're just witnessing the best example of kindness on display.  There is also Mandy Patinkin’s principal, who is prepared for Auggie’s trials and tribulations and tries to make the process run as smoothly and problem-free as possible.

More importantly, just like in Palacio's book, Chbosky decides to divide his narrative into different chapters, dedicating each of the four divisions to young characters who are well connected to Auggie but have problems of their own. The fact that events are repeated and shown through different perspectives brings a surprising artfulness to the film, developing the characters further and investing the viewer even more so into the story. 

There's Auggie's older sister Via (Izabela Vidovic), a high school freshman, whose best friend Miranda (Danielle Rose Russell) comes back from her summer changed and only wanting to hang with the "cool" kids. It does not help that Via has always been second-fiddle in the family to Auggie, mostly due to the sensitive nature of her brother's situation. However, the brother/sister bond they have is undeniably affectionate. Miranda gets her own chapter as well, ditto Auggie's new best friend Jack (Noah Jupe), but he ends up being another strain in Auggie's sensitive emotional state.

It is a good time to mention how good Roberts and Wilson are in their supporting roles. Roberts' Isabel is a well-written part, but Roberts brings some much-added dimension to her role. There is heartbreak, despair, hope, anger, love and so much more in this performance, maybe the best the actress has given us since her Oscar-winning turn in "Erin Brockovich." Yes, it's really been that long since Roberts has fully pushed herself on-screen, not counting, of course, her career-best work as Dr. Emma Brookner in HBO's TV movie "The Normal Heart." Wilson, on the other hand, is her worthy counterpart, hitting all the right notes as the father who cannot let go of the overprotection and guidance he has given his child since his complicated birth.

Of course, with a story such as this, the drama can sometimes have a lack of subtlety to it, especially at its climax when the director tries to preach his stories’ morals in a way that feels out of touch with the rest of his movie. Much of the film's success does reside upon Chbosky's mostly restrained execution, but it is Tremblay that carries it and makes it such a winner. His fully rendered and exceptional performance is something of a miracle as it joyously goes past the prosthetics and into the core of his character's roller coaster of emotions. It's a testament to the 11-year-old's acting abilities that he can jump from a scene filled with drama and emotions to another filled with joy and comic relief. There are not many actors his age, hell any age, that can successfully do what he does in this film. The overwhelming balance act of emotions that Auggie has makes the role a high-wire act in riskiness, which Tremblay swiftly and effortlessly pulls off. [B]

Steven Soderbergh writes an ode to ‘Mad Max: Fury Road’ and says: “I Don’t Understand How Hundreds Of People Aren’t Dead”

Image result for mad max fury road

Steven Soderbergh's comeback with "Logan Lucky" was a succesful one. The writer-director's film was easily one of his 10 best, it was light, breezy, dramatic, comedic, enetrtaining, everything you really wanted in a movie. In other words, the perfect movie to come out of retirement for, an excellent way to refreshen up for the more serious fare to come. Up next for him is "Unsane" a drama starring Juno Temple, which we know little of.

As he was in retirement a cinematic storm brewed in the summer of 2015: "Mad Max: Fury Road." That film just shook the entire industry with its masterful and revolutionry use of practical effects. I wrote about the film, saying -

"You can't deny the sheer impact of Mad Max: Fury Road. Director George Miller's Fourth installment of the film franchise is proof that not all blockbusters should be greeted with an indifferent shrug. If anything, this brutal action film is even more intense and exciting than its predecessors. With its nihilistic outlook on human nature and a nasty, in-your-face style, this is Miller's triumph through and through. The amount of detail that he brings to every frame is as obsessively meticulous as any Wes Anderson picture I've seen, as is the editing by Margaret Sixel, which – as we stand – is most deserving of next year's Film Editing Oscar. Edited at breakneck pace and staged with manic fury, Sixel is the unheralded hero here. The celebrated one is of course Miller who's passion and vision comes through in every frame. The total control he must have had with this project to pull off what he did on screen is unheard of, which is good for him and great for us."

It seems like Soderbergh himself is a hardcore fan of Miller's visionary work of art. Taking the time to promote the upcoming DVD/Blu-Ray release of "Logan Lucky," Soderbergh decided to sneak in a few good words to THR about how blown away he was by George Miller’s artistry in "Mad Max: Fury Road"
The ability to stage well is a skill and a talent that I value above almost everything else. And I say that because there are people who do it better than I’ll ever be able to do it after 40 years of active study. I just watched Mad Max: Fury Road again last week, and I tell you I couldn’t direct 30 seconds of that. I’d put a gun in my mouth. I don’t understand how [George Miller] does that, I really don’t, and it’s my job to understand it. I don’t understand two things: I don’t understand how they’re not still shooting that film and I don’t understand how hundreds of people aren’t dead.
I could almost see that’s kind of possible until the polecat sequence, and then I give up. We are talking about the ability in three dimensions to break a sequence into a series of shots in which no matter how fast you’re cutting you know where you are geographically. And each one is a real shot where a lot of things had to go right. I’m going to keep trying; I’m not going to keep trying in the sense that I’m going to volunteer to direct the next Mad Max movie. I’m going to keep trying in the sense that when I have sequences that demand a certain level of sophistication in terms of their visual staging, I’m going to try and watch the people who do it really well and see if I can climb inside their heads enough to think like that.
But he’s off the chart. I guarantee that the handful of people who are even in range of that, when they saw Fury Road, had blood squirting out of their eyes. The thing with George Miller, it’s not just that, he does everything really well. The scripts are great, the performances are great, the ideas are great. He’s exceptional. I met him once for about 30 seconds at the Directors Guild Awards in Los Angeles the year of Fury Road. But you don’t want to say that stuff to somebody’s face; it’s embarrassing.
Watching [“Mad Max: Fury Road”] again last week, there are four little things that I suddenly picked up the math on. This shot went to that and to that and I picked up the math of what on a real visual level what connected those sequences of shots. With the understanding that this is figuring out four more decimals of pi, I’m never getting to the end of this. So I’ll watch that and I’ll watch some Fincher stuff, some Spielberg stuff, some Cameron stuff, and John McTiernan has shot some stuff that is very impressive. I’m just talking about physical staging of sequences, in which there are multiple elements moving very fast.
I wasn’t born with it, so I have to do these workout sessions. I envy it.

Box Office Week: "Thor: Ragnarok" tops B.O. for second weekend in a row, pushing total domestic gross to $211M, "Daddy's Home 2" debuts with impressive $30M, "Murder on the Orient Express" has a solid $28.2M debut and "Lady Bird" continues to perform strongly, expanding into 37 cinemas

Image result for thor ragnarok box office

1. “Thor: Ragnarok” — $56.6 million ($211.5 mil.)
2. “Daddy’s Home 2” — $30 million
3. “Murder On The Orient Express” — $28.2 million
4. “A Bad Moms Christmas” — $11.5 million ($39.8 mil.)
5. “Jigsaw” — $3.4 million ($34.3 mil.)
6. “Boo 2! A Madea Halloween” — $2 million ($45.9 mil.)
7. “Geostorm” — $1.5 million ($31.6 mil.)
8. “Blade Runner 2049” — $1.4 million ($88 mil.)
9. “Happy Death Day” — $1.3 million ($54.9 mil.)
10. “Lady Bird” — $1.2 million ($1.7 mil.)

Louis C.K.’s apology was ... fine.

Image result for louis ck

Oh well, this wasn't necessarily a surprise. 

Despite Louis C.K. facing multiple sexual harassment claims against him (five women in a report by The New York Times) and not lawyering up, the industry is"swiftly backing away from the director, actor, and writer."  Is his career done? Who knows, my bet is it probably is. I mean, at some point he was outright refusing to comment on the allegations, which started as early as last April by saying “I’m not going to answer to that stuff, because they’re rumors. If you actually participate in a rumor, you make it bigger and you make it real.”
The release of his new movie, "I Love You, Daddy" which he wrote, directed and starred in has been scrapped and its studio, The Orchard, have altogether parted ways with it. Netflix, has also cancelled his upcoming stand-up special. 
And so, with not much choice left but to release a statement, the 50-year-old comedian had this to say to THR:
I want to address the stories told to the New York Times by five women named Abby, Rebecca, Dana, Julia who felt able to name themselves and one who did not.
These stories are true. At the time, I said to myself that what I did was okay because I never showed a woman my dick without asking first, which is also true. But what I learned later in life, too late, is that when you have power over another person, asking them to look at your dick isn’t a question. It’s a predicament for them. The power I had over these women is that they admired me. And I wielded that power irresponsibly.
I have been remorseful of my actions. And I’ve tried to learn from them. And run from them. Now I’m aware of the extent of the impact of my actions. I learned yesterday the extent to which I left these women who admired me feeling badly about themselves and cautious around other men who would never have put them in that position.
I also took advantage of the fact that I was widely admired in my and their community, which disabled them from sharing their story and brought hardship to them when they tried because people who look up to me didn’t want to hear it. I didn’t think that I was doing any of that because my position allowed me not to think about it.
There is nothing about this that I forgive myself for. And I have to reconcile it with who I am. Which is nothing compared to the task I left them with.
I wish I had reacted to their admiration of me by being a good example to them as a man and given them some guidance as a comedian, including because I admired their work.
The hardest regret to live with is what you’ve done to hurt someone else. And I can hardly wrap my head around the scope of hurt I brought on them. I’d be remiss to exclude the hurt that I’ve brought on people who I work with and have worked with who’s professional and personal lives have been impacted by all of this, including projects currently in production: the cast and crew of Better Things, Baskets, The Cops, One Mississippi, and I Love You Daddy. I deeply regret that this has brought negative attention to my manager Dave Becky who only tried to mediate a situation that I caused. I’ve brought anguish and hardship to the people at FX who have given me so much The Orchard who took a chance on my movie. and every other entity that has bet on me through the years.
I’ve brought pain to my family, my friends, my children and their mother.
I have spent my long and lucky career talking and saying anything I want. I will now step back and take a long time to listen.  
I won't go into the nitty-gritty and analyze it all. Suffice to say, it's nevertheless an actual apology, he doesn't try and redirect the topic, unlike Mr. Spacey's infamous coming-out party last week. He didn't run from the issue either, unlike Mr. Weinstein's exit to Europe and total lack of compassion. No, it's not a full apology, but he does not victim blame, he owns up, confesses, and somewhat apologizes, most of all he also realized the power he held over these women. . Let’s just hope he’s being sincere and that no others were affected.
My thoughts on "I Love You, Daddy" from last September HERE

Source: The Playlist

"Murder on the Orient Express" loses steam as it goes along

murder-on-the-orient-express-1

Yes, I saw Kenneth Branagh's misbegotten adaptation of Agatha Christie's brilliant "Murder on the Orient Express." It wasn't meaty enough, didn't feel like a full-course meal, instead it was a half-baked affair that has spurts of brilliant scattered over a dull, monotonous narrative. The full review can be read here on The Film Stage.

A few excerpts:

"While Branagh and the cast at his disposal keep the proceedings engaging and spontaneous as they could be for the first hour, the second hour is a different story as a multitude of heavy-handed reveals within a messy structure consistently threaten to derail the initial pleasures. Unlike the BBC’s Sherlock, Branagh’s classical style begins to dull; even the finding of an important clue feels unexciting. At no point are we ever intrigued as to who the killer is which is an issue for a two-hour murder mystery. Suffice to say, this all leads to muddled structural decisions and an underwhelming finale which has us playing catch-up to Poirot instead of discovering the reveals alongside him."
"When it comes to a murder-mystery, one would expect tense atmosphere with a hint of dreadful paranoia lurking in every frame. Branagh misses this tension with a too-polite approach, over-stuffed with camaraderie and strenuous likability. The claustrophobia of the source material is gone, replaced with Branagh’s interest in shots that depict, for example, the majesty of the snow post-avalanche, instead of Christie’s descriptions of the harsh conditions entrapping the characters on the train. Branagh—the actor—dominates the film, with everyone else in supporting roles. Meanwhile Branagh—the director—relies on a too-colorful style and atmosphere, shooting himself in the foot by cutting short the darkness that loomed in Christie’s original vision."

26 Animated Features Submitted For 2017 Oscar Race

emoji_breadwinner

This has been a very weak year for animation. I couldn't even find 5 buzz-worthy titles of the 26 that are eligible for the animation Oscar this coming February. Surely the creators of the Emoji Movie understand the Oscars would sooner cancel themselves than nominate that thing for anything..... I hope. So this race is more or less going to come down to these titles:

Coco
The Breadwinner
The LEGO Batman Movie
Loving Vincent

I would bet on Coco. It's not landmark Pixar but it's definitely a hard-earned and respectable effort from the company.


The list in its entirety:

The Big Bad Fox & Other Tales
Birdboy: The Forgotten Children
The Boss Baby
The Breadwinner
Captain Underpants The First Epic Movie
Cars 3
Cinderella the Cat
Coco
Despicable Me 3
The Emoji Movie
Ethel & Ernest
Ferdinand
The Girl without Hands
In This Corner of the World
The Lego Batman Movie
The Lego Ninjago Movie
Loving Vincent
Mary and the Witch’s Flower
Moomins and the Winter Wonderland
My Entire High School Sinking into the Sea
Napping Princess
A Silent Voice
Smurfs: The Lost Village
The Star
Sword Art Online: The Movie – Ordinal Scale
Window Horses: The Poetic Persian Epiphany of Rosie Ming

First Poster for Netflix's Documentary 'Jim & Andy: The Great Beyond' - The Story of Jim Carrey's Transformation Into Andy Kaufman for 'Man On The Moon'




Back in 1999, Jim Carrey was chosen to play Andy Kaufman in the major Hollywood biopic, "Man on the Moon." I remember looking forward to his Kaufman portrayal, especially given the fact that a year prior to that he was the lead actor in the best movie of 1998 "The Truman Show." He showed he had the chops to carry a full-on drama with the kind of grace and brilliance not many actors in the industry could pull off. Not only was he a brilliant comedian, but now he was a brilliant actor. Playing Kaufman might have felt like a stretch for the actor, after all, Kaufman was an unpredictable eccentric weirdo that could not really be analyzed or assessed by any means due to his outrageously unpredictable behavior. We all know how great the film and performance were, Carrey’s extraordinary performance in “Man on the Moon” was a triumph, not only did he nail every detailed nuance of Kaufman’s persona, he actually brought vulnerability and hurt to the role, something we couldn't possibly imagine Kaufman having, which he, of course, had.

I was aware that to create this on-screen performance Carrey went the method acting route and stayed in-character throughout the shoot of "Man on the Moon," but I never imagined it done to the maddeningly drastic extent that is shown in Chris Smith’s fascinating documentary “Jim & Andy: The Great Beyond — featuring a very special, contractually obligated mention of Tony Clifton.” Carrey's on-set hijinks pissed more than a few people off on-set, including director Milos Forman and, thankfully for us, the actor had his own documentary crew filming his every move back in 1999. Watching the footage today makes you appreciate, even more, the channeling of Andy Kaufman that Carrey bestowed upon us, it also, more intriguingly, makes us learn more about the actor's existential demons at the time. The role was a kind of catharsis for him, as he was going through an identity crisis that seemed very similar to Kaufman's. In 1999, Carrey was the $20 million dollar man, audience expectations were through the roof. 

“Jim & Andy: The Great Beyond” is built around 20 hours of camcorder footage of Carrey on the “Man on the Moon” set and thank God it was placed in the vault by Universal Pictures for the fact that this extraordinary document exists because of their value to treasure any sort of archival footage. It's best not to know too much about "Jim and Andy," so just watch it, especially if you're a fan of, not just cinematic history, but the ordeals that come in finding yourself throught extreme measures. Later in the ensuing decade, Carrey would do his now infamous disappearance act, completely leaving the public spotlight and concentrating on his own well-being and happiness. This film reminds us of how lucky we were to have such a boldly original talent working within the studio system.

You can look for it on Netflix November 17th.

Denis Villeneuve says his next movie is "Dune"

Image result for dune villeneuve

My colleague over at The Playlist, Gregory Ellwood, interviewed Denis Villeneuve as part of a podcast and got this juicy tidbit about what the venerable director's follow-up to "Blade Runner" will be, "Dune" fans take note:

"The thing is I don’t now about that, but listen,” Villeneuve says. “Daniel Craig is a very inspiring actor and I had some contact and the thing is that I’m busy right now doing ‘Dune.’ But, I will say to have the privilege to work with him it would be a dream. I would love to work with Daniel and a Bond movie for me would be a treat. It’s a matter of timing, I guess.”


It has been rumored for a while that Legendary Pictures had been courting Villeneuve for their upcoming Dune reboot. It was finally revealed, just a few months back, by Brian Herbert (son of Dune author Frank Herbert), on twitter no less, that the contracts had been signed, and Villeneuve would be directing the film. This is all very exciting news considering David Lynch's lackluster 1984 version was a tremendous disappointment to most of the book's hardcore fans and that a Dune movie has been rumored for decades now. If there's a director that could pull it off, maybe it's Villeneuve. Also knowing how quick he is to jump into projects, I wouldn't be surprised if the filming starts very soon ...

[The Playlist]

"Justice League" Producer: “We’re Hoping That People Don’t Think About How This Movie Was Made”

Image result for justice league
We all know of the crazy reshoots the WB/DC were doing on “Justice League” for its November release and it seemed like they were axing Jesse Eisenberg as Lex Luthor from the project entirely. The “Justice League” reshoots have been a source of controversy for the WB, who had to contend with Zack Snyder leaving post-production for personal reasons and Joss Whedon (“The Avengers“) taking his place to finish the movie. Whedon went on to service a remolding of the film, with the aforementioned reshoots, after WB execs reportedly deemed a rumored first cut unwatchable. That is if you believe the swirling and rampant rumors in the first place. Damage control was inevitable and the WB have been pushing back on the negative rumors.

Gal Gadot also tried to defend the recent reshoots by saying the tone of “Justice League” couldn’t change that much because the movie was already shot; Also, she confirms that Whedon was Snyder’s first choice:
“Look, Joss, to my understanding, was Zack’s choice to finish the movie. And the tone can’t be completely different because the movie was already shot. Joss is just fine-tuning.”
I'm supposed to catch the film next Tuesday. According to The Playlist, The final film is said to be a mix of both filmmakers sensibilities, which fits with both Snyder and Whedon NOT making the press circuit rounds for the film. They probably want to let the film speak for itself. 
At a press conference for “Justice League,” producer Deborah Snyder (and wife of Zack Snyder) stated that her wish is for the audience to keep an open mind when watching the film and to not think about the reshoots.
“I think, for us, this whole thing is so bittersweet,” she said about Zack Snyder’s departure. “We had been working on this franchise for the last, almost eight years [from] when we’d been developing the script for ‘Man of Steel,’ and then we moved on to ‘BvS‘ and also, Zack developed the story for ‘Wonder Woman,’ which was leading up to the point of ‘Justice League,’ where the characters were going to come together. I mean, this was a great hero’s journey, and a journey for these characters to be the characters that they are today. So not being able to complete his vision was extremely difficult.”
“Our feeling is, we’re hoping that people don’t think about how this movie was made when they go to see it, because these characters are bigger than any director, they’re bigger than any of us. We love and adore these characters,” she continued.
It’s so easy to get caught up with all this talk about reshoots, but, at the end of the day, what has always laid toxic movie rumors to rest was the finished product itself turning out great. Yes, it is concerning to read rumors about allegedly “unwatchable” movies, but let’s see how “Justice League” turns up when it is released on November 17th before passing judgement.
 [THR]

Mark Hamill: Luke Skywalker Isn’t A Bad Guy In ‘Star Wars: The Last Jedi’

“Star Wars: The Last Jedi.” is more or less going to be the only thing we talk about for the next six weeks, OK maybe "Phantom Thread" as well, but the trailers and TV spots will be studied with a close eye for any new details. Don't forget the media junkets in which we will most likely want to ask the actors of "The Last Jedi" questions they cannot answer. 
The main rumor in fan circles was that Luke was going to go to the "dark side" in "The Last Jedi," well you can rest assured folks, it ain't happening, at least according to Mr. Skywalker himself. 

ComingSoon, us saying that Mark Hamill, has put to rest any rumors that his character will turn out just like his father, Mr. Vader. “Luke has lost confidence in his ability to make good choices,” said Hamill. “It haunts him to the core. But he hasn’t gone to the dark side. This isn’t an evil version of him. But it’s still an incarnation of the character I never expected. It has pulled me out of my comfort zone. It’s a real challenge.”
In all honesty, I'm not surprised. I still stand by the fact that he will die at the end very much in the same spirit as Han Solo in "The Force Awakens."
My impression, after watching the latest trailer, was that Luke stood no chance at coming out of this movie alive. Solo was axed in "The Force Awakens" and I believe Skywalker is the next to go here. They probably figured Carrie Fisher would survive in the third installment and be the "mother" of the future Jedi movement, but that, sadly, backfired on them ... 
They're also pushing the Rey turns evil angle and, I would guess, that could go either way. It could just be Disney messing with us. Rey is the main character, having her go down the dark path would be a risky endeavor for Disney and it just doesn't make any sense commercially as well, especially since they usually tend to play their artistic risks \on the safe side and having Rey turn evil would be a drastic change, think of the all the little girls that bought her figurines!  
We see her chasing down Kylo and trying to kill him or something and Luke is warning her not to. Kylo is just an angry dude doing his own thing. Luke is scared of the force so Kylo kicked him to the curb and joined the First Order so he could get some sort of actual training.
 December 15 is when “Star Wars: The Last Jedi” will lay to rest all this speculation.

The insane tracking shot brawl in "Atomic Blonde" took four days to shoot, and only happened because John Wick director David Leitch was willing to give stuntmen opportunities as actors.



Who doesn’t love a good action movie about revenge? What Liam Neeson did in 2008 with “Taken” has allowed it to become one of the most influential Hollywood films of the last decade or so.  You know the formula by now: an aging male superstar plays a former intelligence agent or operative or assassin, with a “particular set of skills,” who comes out of retirement after a close relative is murdered or kidnapped. Of course that “close relative” has evolved over the years to become a spouse, a daughter, a friend, or even, in the case of “John Wick,” a pet. Then our washed up,  former bad boy ends up systematically hunting down and killing a bunch of foreign baddies.

Neeson and “Taken” really started a chain reaction of older, more mature-looking, Hollywood A-listers taking a crack at being action stars. Just look at the list of similar revenge action vehicles that came next: Keanu Reeves in “John Wick,” Denzel Washington in “The Equalizer,” Sean Penn in “The Gunman,” Kevin Costner in “3 Days to Kill,” and Pierce Brosnan in “The November Man.” Neeson has himself become a one-man genre, not only were there two other “Taken” movies, but he’s also done ‘Taken’-esque films like “A Walk Among the Tombstones,” “Run All Night,” “Non-Stop,” and “Unknown.” All starring male actors, but how about the women? 
I thought "Atomic Blonde" was worth a watch just for its elaborately conceived fight scenes. I mean, these were just jaw-dropping sequences that almost made up for the dull plot. Charlize Theron starred as Lorraine Broughton, the titular atomic blonde, an MI6 agent that also happens to have a special set of skills, hell, she'll even turn a household item into a lethal weapon. 

The piece de resistance of the film, and there are plenty of contenders, takes place in an East Berlin apartment building, where Lorraine takes on a squad of KGB agents. Director David Leitch is an incredible new talent in Hollywood, he was intially a stunt coordinator for 20 years before making his directorial debut with "John Wick," and in that movie you could sense the years of experience in stunt-making business paying off.  He has mentioned the apartment sequence was  “the pinnacle of the action in the movie,” 

The aforementioned sequence begins in the middle of a political protest which leads our characters to an empty apartment building with four extended staircases connecting three floors. The scene has Lorraine in charge of protecting the life of a defecting Stasi officer. The beating Theron's Lorraine takes here is punishing to watch, the actors she faces off against were trained professionals and I wouldn't be surprised if she had more than a few bruises by the end of the shoot. It’s clear that Leitch’s experienced eye for detail helped here, resulting in some of the most intense and complicated fight scene in recent studio cinema history.

What's more astonishing is that it seems to be done in what appears to be (but isn't) a single take. How did Leitch pull this off? Here he is speaking to Rolling Stone:

"I wanted to do something that was really provocative and shocking to the audience. So the idea was to stay with the character and really feel immersed in the action – to feel every punch and [all of] her fear. Basically, we wanted to not give the audience a chance to take a breath. Psychologically, with the illusion of a single take ... you're always waiting for the cut. The edit makes you feel like you're in a movie. So when you're not seeing them, your mind goes to a different place."
"Logistically, it's probably assembling 20-plus shots. That being said, for those nine minutes of screen time ... there are some really long pieces of choreography that involved coordination with stunts, special effects and actors. Everyone had to be on their game to get these long takes that were, like, over a minute long. If you messed up any beat in the middle, you had to start over. But it is assembling several takes. To do that, we used a lot of old-school camera tricks with whip-pans and lens-crafting, using frames to create split-screens. It's not as high-tech as you think; it's really a lot of clever, old-school filmmaking."
"The [single-take forest assault] sequence in Children of Men was something that always really fascinated me when I first saw it. I think the departure we wanted to take is that, in that movie, the action goes on around a protagonist. What I wanted to do was, 'Okay, she is sort of the trigger point of the action.' So instead of watching explosions in the background and a war going on – she is the war going on. It's going to feel physically exhausting, and also more unbelievable that you were able to keep the camera rolling for that long."
"What's great about Charlize is, when I said, 'I want to make this special,' the way to do it is to dive into the training:  do your own choreography and stunts. Never break character and never break the illusion in using the convention of the stunt double, or the over-the-shoulder shot of the stunt double and just your close-up. We need to see you do it in wide shots and long pieces. I threw down the gauntlet early, but she snatched it up willingly. She gave it 110%. Once she understood what we wanted to do, she was all over it."

[Rolling Stone]

Kevin Spacey cut from ‘All The Money In The World;’ and Replaced by Christopher Plummer. December 22nd release date still intact

Image result for spacey plummer
I think we can all agree that Kevin Spacey's Hollywood career is done.

Just when you thought the plot couldn't thicken any further, Ridley Scott has decided to replace Spacey from the final cut of  “All The Money In The World.” Newly inserted into the film will be Christopher Plummer who will be filming his scenes as John Paul Getty this week according to Deadline. This will all have to coincide and squeeze into the film's December 22nd release date, just six weeks hence. Suffice to say, we have never seen anything like this before.
Co-stars Michelle Williams and Mark Wahlberg will have to come back for additional shooting, due to some of Plummer's scenes involving their characters. According to Deadline, Spacey's role took 10 days to shoot, but his performance was going to be pushed for awards consdieration by the film's studio Sony. 
THR is also reporting that Scott notified the studio of his impromptu decision just this afternoon. Also according to THR, Plummer was initially supposed to play Getty but the studio preferred Spacey due to his more prestigious clout.

The fact that the Dec. 22nd release date is fast appraching makes this a risky endeavor for Sony.

Fargo Season 4?

Image result for fargo fx

We all had our doubts when we first heard that Joel and Ethan Coen's masterpiece "Fargo" was going to get adapted for the small screen, courtesy of FX, but after the first episode of creator Noah Hawley' brilliant series adapatation we were converted. if you've yet to catch up to the FX show that bears the same name and style of dramedy as the Coen's 1996 Minnesota film noir masterpiece, then you are quite possibly missing out on the best show on TV. The first season was a home run, the second season was a near-miracle of multiple moving parts, maybe the best season of television since Season 4 of "Breaking Bad, and finally the third season might not have satisfied every fan with its multitudes of ambiguities and unlikeable characters, but it had its fair share of brilliant moments that cemented Hawley as a world-class visionary.  The ambition and sheer scope of the series has been nothing short of groundbreaking and, although we still have a few unanswered questions about the last season, and the season before it, answers will likely never come since the beauty of the show is leave open the never-ending mysteries of life. "Hawley's show casts a dark, almost miraculous spell thanks to its writing, acting, directing, cinematography, music and set design, which are all spot-on and in sync with its creator's artistic vision.

Given the show's popularity, and the rave reviews that have greeted it over the last three seasons, you would think Hawley would be all for a fourth season happening, but his reluctance has been showing more and more ever since the final episode of season three aired more than 2 months ago. It's not like FX isn't ready for it either, they too want more "Fargo," FX CEO John Landgraf is even stating that he's waiting for a pitch:

“I hope so, I haven’t heard. We haven’t heard the idea from Noah for what the fourth season would be. I think what we’ve encouraged Noah to do is think about it and make sure he has something he’s really excited about and has something to believe in. There’s a possibility he won’t have that idea for some time. There’s also the possibility, because Noah’s been fertile and productive, that we’ll hear that idea soon.”

Hawley, like any other genius, doesn't force it, he just waits it out and let's it happen until, boom, an idea strikes in his head and the creative juices start rolling. We wouldn't want it any other way and believe that if it takes a few years for Hawley to grasp on an idea then so be it, it'll be more than worth that wait. In the meantime, Hawley has been working on his other series, FX's X-Men universe series "Legion," which just wrapped its first, very succesful, season. Ladgraf says that Hawley is “working actively on the second season of Legion.”  There's also talk that Hawley will make a "Doctor Doom" movie. No wonder "Fargo" is being relegated to the back-end for now, Hawley is turning into one hot commodity and seems to be gunning for Hollywood as well.

[/Film]

Bryan Singer's Past May Be Coming Back To Haunt Him



I wrote a little exposee about Bryan Singer for The Playlist. The director of "The Usual Suspects" and four "X-Men" films has had a not-so-good reputation shadowing him for the past 2 decades. Most people have said it is inevitable for his day of reckoning to come, I say, as long as nobody comes forth and presents a case, it won't happen. It seems like he has more or less payed off most of his accusers and those that actually brought him to court had to withdraw their accusations due to Singer lawyering up and the victims not being able to keep up with their legal fees. Sometimes life isn't fair. Am I basically telling you that he is unquestionably guilty of the alleged accusations? Of course not, just look at the facts and decide for yourselves.