The best Roger Moore story you will not hear about

Image result for roger moore 600x200
I was at Cannes when I heard the news. I didn't have the chance to write about Roger Moore's passing at the young age, c'mon it's 2017, of 89 years old. However, no story or obit would do the man justice, we've heard so many stories about how great and gentle of a human being he was, but I believe this particular tale takes the cake.
Mark Haynes posted on Facebook an incredibly moving and exemplary chance meeting he had with Moore at an airport, when he was just seven years of age.
"As a seven-year-old in about 1983, in the days before First Class Lounges at airports, I was with my grandad in Nice Airport and saw Roger Moore sitting at the departure gate, reading a paper. I told my granddad I'd just seen James Bond and asked if we could go over so I could get his autograph. My grandad had no idea who James Bond or Roger Moore were, so we walked over and he popped me in front of Roger Moore, with the words "my grandson says you're famous. Can you sign this?"
"As charming as you'd expect, Roger asks my name and duly signs the back of my plane ticket, a fulsome note full of best wishes. I'm ecstatic, but as we head back to our seats, I glance down at the signature. It's hard to decipher it but it definitely doesn't say 'James Bond'. My grandad looks at it, half figures out it says 'Roger Moore' - I have absolutely no idea who that is, and my hearts sinks. I tell my grandad he's signed it wrong, that he's put someone else's name - so my grandad heads back to Roger Moore, holding the ticket which he's only just signed."
"I remember staying by our seats and my grandad saying "he says you've signed the wrong name. He says your name is James Bond." Roger Moore's face crinkled up with realisation and he beckoned me over. When I was by his knee, he leant over, looked from side to side, raised an eyebrow and in a hushed voice said to me, "I have to sign my name as 'Roger Moore' because otherwise...Blofeld might find out I was here." He asked me not to tell anyone that I'd just seen James Bond, and he thanked me for keeping his secret. I went back to our seats, my nerves absolutely jangling with delight. My grandad asked me if he'd signed 'James Bond.' No, I said. I'd got it wrong. I was working with James Bond now."
"And then he did something so brilliant. After the filming, he walked past me in the corridor, heading out to his car - but as he got level, he paused, looked both ways, raised an eyebrow and in a hushed voice said, "Of course I remember our meeting in Nice. But I didn't say anything in there, because those cameramen - any one of them could be working for Blofeld."Many, many years later, I was working as a scriptwriter on a recording that involved UNICEF, and Roger Moore was doing a piece to camera as an ambassador. He was completely lovely and while the cameramen were setting up, I told him in passing the story of when I met him in Nice Airport. He was happy to hear it, and he had a chuckle and said "Well, I don't remember but I'm glad you got to meet James Bond." So that was lovely."
"I was as delighted at 30 as I had been at 7. What a man. What a tremendous man."

'An Inconvenient Sequel' more relevant than ever before

Image result for AN INCONVENIENT SEQUEL 600X200

There are movies that just gain traction and relevance when real-life events happen. Bonnie Cohen and Jon Chenk must be thinking we hit the goldmine here, albeit a bittersweet goldmine, as their upcoming "An Inconvenient Sequel" has gained a ton of relevance since yesterday's Trump dismissal of the climate accords. In fact, the climate accords play a very big role in their movie, the lats half hour or so is dedicated to the nitty gritty, behind-the-scenes, inside look of how that deal came to be.

So it is only fitting that Cohen and Shank's movie has just been edited to include Trump's exit from the Paris accords. The film was supposed to end on a positive note, but it seems yesterday's news has made the filmmaking duo re-think their entire outlook.

Variety:

Al Gore’s “An Inconvenient Sequel: Truth to Power” will get a last-minute edit to incorporate President Donald Trump’s decision to withdraw the U.S. from the Paris climate agreement.

“An Inconvenient Sequel” is slated for release July 28. Paramount said the filmmakers will revise the movie to include Trump’s controversial move, announced Thursday.

“The final film will address today’s news,” Paramount spokesperson Katie Martin Kelley told Variety.

Here's an excerpt of my review from Sundance;

"An Inconvenient Sequel" is Al Gore's state of the union address, an important document of change and time. In fact the notion of time healing everything and making us realize our mistakes is a key theme in this film directed by Bonnie Cohen and Jon Chenk. I would go as far as to say that it is better than the 2006 David Guggenheim film, if, maybe, not as revolutionary considering that film brought global warming to the forefront of the mainstream and changed the political spectrum when it came to the environment. If that 2006 film felt like a high school lecture/power point, and I'm not stretching it a bit here considering it is one of the most watched films in high schools nationwide, this sequel is more in the style of cinema verite and has Gore in a rather passionate and angry mood. The high point of the film has the former Vice-President manoeuvring chaotically/strategically to get
India on board the 2016 Paris agreement, a key setting for the film which shows what can happen when world leaders come together to better the planet we live in."

Gore also appeared post-screening:

“This movie gives me an extra burst of hope because I think …it really effectively tells the story of how much hope is our there for transforming our energy system to become much more efficient,” Gore told the crowd, almost all of who remained in their seats after the screening concluded. Gore added: “We are going to win this.”

Debra Winger talks "The Lovers" [Interview]

Image result for debra winger 600x200

How rare it is to find a romantic comedy about a middle-aged couple in this day and age of American cinema. The marriage at the core of Azael Jacobs’ “The Lovers” is so authentically rendered to the audience that many of the scenes come off as painfully real.
“The Lovers” is about those who love, but also about those who discard love. The couple at the center of this tragi-comedy are Mary (Debra Winger) and Michael (Tracy Letts), both pursuing seperate affairs and all, but having given up on their marriage. Don’t be discouraged by the morose nature in which I describe “The Lovers,” for it springs surprises of hope and healing in its tightly-knit running time o 94 minutes, that no writer should reveal.
The film is a scathing, but humorously authentic take on the state of true love and being faithful to one another. Its young writer-director, helmer of the vastly underrated “Terri,” is asking tough, everlasting questions about what love means and if it could ever be realistically sustained trough a lifetime. The film implies that middle aged couples can be, and are, as sexually screwed up as any younger couple in their mid-20s.
Debra Winger is at the center of these sustained, depth-filled questions. She gives one of the very best performances of her career as Mary, a woman filled with disappointment, wounded by a lackluster marriage and on the brink of telling her spouse she’s had enough. There’s an abundance of passion and wit in Winger’s tour-de-force performance. Unpredictable, intense and filed with abundant wit, Winger shows a vulnerable side to her art by opening herself up to a role that Jacobs had specifically written for her.
She spoke to me about the film and what it means to have such a depth-filled, female role come her way at this stage of her career, a role which, as I cross my fingers, could land her a fourth Best Actress nomination.
It’s a pleasure meeting you, despite this little hiccup we just had on the phone. What was that music as we weren’t being put on hold!?
Hello Jordan, did you have the same technological glitch there? From my perspective I was stuck in what sounded like, you know the music you have no control over when you’re on hold, it was sort of like an elevator between a piercing place and a tattoo salon, the kind of music they would play in a place with that hybrid.
I think that’s what I was listening to as well
So we’re already on the same page here [Laughs].
Well, I have to say, loved your performance, loved the movie so it’s very exciting to talk to you about this. So I presume you still have offers to act in movies. What made “The Lovers” the right movie for you? Did it come at the right time?
I had met [director] Azael Jacobs before, so I knew him. I had written him a letter, I had asked him if he ever had anything where he felt like somebody like me could be in. So we kept a relationship where we spoke a couple times a year. At some point the script arrived and I knew that I really wanted to work with him.
Oh really? So you write notes to directors often? Or was it just Azael?
I wouldn’t say often, but I have been known to drop the occasional fan note.
Any other directors you would be allowed to name check in this interview?
Oh, I think I’ve written notes to Paul Thomas Anderson, I think I’ve written notes to Mike Leigh, Olivier Assayas, yeah I’ve written some notes [Laughs].
You definitely have good taste
So you like the film. You sound like a younger person.
Yeah, I loved it. I got married a year ago, so it still feels fresh.
So this movie didn’t depress you?
No, because I know all about the territory that I’m getting myself into.
Yeah, that’s true. You don’t have to be married to know that the institution creates some traps. I remember the first time I got married around 31 years ago. The first movie that we saw, oh shit can’t remember the title, but it was Meryl Streep, Jack Nicholson and Nora Ephron wrote the screenplay about marriage, and it was so depressing and it was like everybody hated each other, marriage was horrible and I was like this is not a good honeymoon movie.
Are you talking about “Heartburn”?
“Heartburn,” yeah, but I feel like “The Lovers” is a cautionary tale and I think in my life, as far as love is concerned, because I do love love stories, always liked to tell love stories, I find them mysterious and the question about how to make love stay is a lasting question and I like to keep asking it and I think cautionary tales are a good thing.
Well, I find the movie is, in the end, not that depressing because it feels almost hopeful, it gives you hope!
I agree.
It also explores all the strains that eventually develop in marriage and how to defeat those demons.
Right, and how easily we could fall asleep and how we don’t even notice it because it just seems more convenient not to confront it. And also I have this whole theory going in that good writers don’t even realize it, they’re writing on such an intuitive level, that when the actors start pulling it apart and inhabiting it, things come out. And when we got up to Santa Clarita, where it was shot, and I saw where we were going to shoot, this suburban middle class neighborhood, I was like, man this is a whole sector of America that is white-knuckling it right now, you know? And it’s a luxury to afford to divorce. You’re not getting along, your relationship isn’t going well, “oh let’s get two apartments, pay two electric bills.” People don’t realize what a privilege decision that can be.
Oh yeah, completely agree with that. That side of the story is never tackled.
So, I was very interested in the socio-economic side of it in that, you stay in the same house, you kind of avoid each other, you try to find some happiness wherever you can, then one day you wake up and you’re like “wait a minute, this is my life?”
I know a couple that’s in that situation. They’re pretty open about it as well.
Yeah, well it moves to that stage if it doesn’t move to the other stage, which is where “The Lovers” is. I think it also is a timing thing. You could do that for a while, but when your kid goes off to college and you’re left with this glaring lie in your life, it’s pretty hard to realize that you’re not doing well. We forget how tentative we are, we’re only here for a little while.
That moment of finiteness. But, yeah when the kid goes to college you both just look at each other and you’re like “Ok, I have to be with YOU now?”
Well, you know, if you’re doing this whole sneaking around and cheating thing just to keep the structure of a marriage which is somewhat familiar to a child, that tends to fall apart, plus, for the most part, you find out that he’s known all along anyway because as we know when we have a baby they are totally vibratory creatures, I mean they pick up on everything and it doesn’t matter what they “know or don’t know”, they know it in their bodies.
The chemistry that you have in the movie with Tracy Letts to showcase these details is quite incredible. I know him mostly as a playwright, what was it like working with him?
Yeah, he’s been a sort of late bloomer to movies and, as he would tell you, usually plays the guy in a suit ordering the drone strike. For him, I think he was kind of lit up by the role itself. You know, being able to be in that situation in a film, I mean, I’m sure he’s done it on stage, but I was just so delighted because he was just so available and for me, I say yes to a director, and I mean YES. I show up and if I’ve said yes, I’m pretty much willing to explore anything. If you make yourself available you don’t really have much protection and that can be super painful, not in a physical way, but it’s like any other situation in life, movies are no different if you’re doing it right, so I don’t have a craft that allows me to go in and protect all my corners and, sort of, nooks and crannies and give an honest and open performance. I have to be in a trusting environment and I think Azael created that and I think Tracy was just so up for that, that’s how he looks at having a scene partner. We hit it off and we used that feeling and we ran with it and I think that when you’re younger you mistake that feeling in life and that’s when so many actors screw up [Laughs].
A whole bunch of stuff happens
Yeah, a whole bunch of stuff happens in a movie because you’re emotionally available and, in this case, the right exact thing happened. You know, we’re both happily married to other people and we just access that part of ourselves that would have probably gone wild and off the rails years ago.
How long was the shoot?
24 days.
That’s fairly …
Shocking. That was shocking to me. I mean, I come from a world where we shot almost three months on a film. I’m telling you, it was rollicking, I don’t mind it, but I think that a few more days would have been nice.
That’s actually a very common thing for an actor to tell me these days, that the shoot was way too short.
Well, because independent films now are just, you know, shot out of the canon. There’s usually not a lot of time for preparation, I was lucky enough to have some time on this, and you’re working, you know, 14 hour days, and you’re driving yourself to locations. I’m really hoping that the business is finding its watermark because when the bottom fell out of the independent film business it was just so shocking that all that could be made was a 500 thousand dollar or a 500 million dollar film and we’re starting to see the advent between a $1M movie and a $30M movie, which we haven’t seen since, I don’t know, the late ’70s early ’80s. I made one called “Mike’s Murder,” sort of at the beginning of the independent film boom and then, of course, “Big Bad Love” was at the end of it, so I think we just have to find this place where we can make right-sized movies that good actors want to make and you don’t have to sit for five hours and have to play a superhero’s movie or a purple Amoeba from another planet, but that you can tell some stories that we need to hear. Hopefully the budget can come up a bit from this one and give you a little more time so you all don’t fall under the weather and we can make some movies.
I guess this is a little better than shooting “Sheltering Sky” for, what was it, five months?
No, I don’t think it’s better. That was a transformational experience. I had my kid with me, I had my whole life with me, I loved that shoot, I have no complaints about that shoot. I don’t think every movie should be five months. I do also find that the experience of making “The Lovers” was transformational for me because, at my age, to be able to tell a story about the vivacity and the connection into life that I feel inside, it so rarely finds a place in society to live. You know, we like to put older people in a box and keep them separate and believe that it’s never going to happen to us. I’m here to say that at 61 it’s a really vibrant time.
I’m sure you’re always searching for those opportunities
I am, I just don’t think that they’re written for the most part.

It took Patty Jenkins over a decade to direct a second feature film yet her $8 million indie Monster out-grossed Colin Trevorrow's pre-Jurassic movie, Jordan Vogt-Roberts' pre-Kong movie, and Peter Jackson's pre-LOTR movies. Combined.

Image result for patty jenkins 600x200

Her last movie "Monster," was also her debut. She was hired to direct "Wonder Woman" in April of 2015. 

The Guardian has this about the shifting paradigm:

"Remember the misbegotten Catwoman of 2004, or 2005’s less-than-electric Elektra? Neither does anyone else, except perhaps Halle Berry and Jennifer Garner. The Hunger Games franchise and the stardom of Jennifer Lawrence helped shift things, preparing audiences for the not-so-radical idea that a young woman as fantasy-movie protagonist might be a box-office viability, not liability."

“Absolutely. There are technical reasons [for her long hiatus from film], I had a baby, I had a movie that didn’t go, all those things are true.” What is also true, however, is that “I have passed on a lot of things that would have been extremely lucrative, because they were nothing else. Even if it’s an action movie, even if it’s a thriller, I want to bring something beautiful into the world on some level that I believe in.” That attitude, she says, has made her “unbelievably picky”
There’s also the industry’s sexism: “It’s played a part – I’m not offered things that are authentic to me very often. I did not necessarily feel that Hollywood was interested in what I wanted to do. They wanted me to do what they wanted to do.”
She tells EW:
“When I made Monster and they asked me what I wanted to do [next], I immediately said, ‘I want to make Wonder Woman,” says Jenkins, during a break from production on the Leavesden set of her dream job. “Everybody knew I wanted to make a superhero movie.”
I know she took a break because she had her first child, and did direct television as well, including an amazing "Arrested Development" episode. But I still think this speaks volumes to the sexism in Hollywood.
Here are the numbers according to BoxOfficeMojo:

Colin Trevorrow: "Safety Not Guaranteed": $4,010,000
Jordan Vogt-Roberts: "The King of The Summer": $1,315,590
Peter Jackson: "Forgotten Silver": $26,459 "The Frighteners": $29,359,216 Dead Alive $242,623 "Heavenly Creatures": $3,049,135
Total: 38,003,023
Patty Jenkins: "Monster": $60,378,584

Katherine Hepburn only drank water throughout The African Queen production as a protest of Humphrey Bogart’s alcoholism. However, most of the cast and crew became sick from the water and only Bogart was unaffected because he only drank whiskey.

Image result for the african queen movie 600x200

"The cast and crew endured sickness, and spartan living conditions during their time on location. In one scene, Hepburn was playing an organ but had a bucket nearby because she was often sick between takes. Bogart later bragged that he was the only one to escape illness, which he credited to not drinking any water on location, but instead fortifying himself from the large supply of Gordon's gin he had brought along with him." [11][12]

[Wikipedia]

OFFICIAL: Lebanon Bans "Wonder Woman" Over Israeli Lead Gal Gadot



"Wonder Woman" is not an Israeli product, so this is more about Lebanon being angry over the lead of the film being an Israeli woman. Regardless, "Wonder Woman" is about to become the most pirated movie in Lebanon. 

Deadline has it like this:

"The ban was prompted by Lebanese group Campaign to Boycott Supporters of Israel-Lebanon because Gal Gadot, the film’s lead actress who plays Diana Prince aka Wonder Woman, is an Israeli and a former soldier in that country’s army."
"The ban would have been decided by Lebanon’s Ministry of Economy, through which a six-member committee would execute such a decision but the call to ban it nationwide is not unanimous."

Yesterday I wrote:

"Hey Lebanon, continue thinking like small-minded fools, that'll bring you far as a country ... Disappointing news from the land that gave us Shwaramas."

"Listen to Gad Saad when he was interviewed by Joe Rogan. He talks about growing up in Lebanon and when a classmate, aged 9 years old, said in class that he wanted to become a Jew killer and everyone was okay with it. The fact that these people are anti-Jew, and acting childish like this is no surprise to me at all. It's just a matter of showing your true colors and the Lebanese government is doing just that."

Studios are blaming Rotten Tomatoes for "Pirates of the Caribbean" and "Baywatch" tanking at the Box-Office

Image result for baywatch 600x200

Oh, give me a break. You really think we wanted a fifth "Pirates" movie? Who's the brainiac that greenlit the damn thing? How about making a movie out of a show, "Baywatch," that was mocked at when it aired in the '90s and was only watched by pervs that wanted to catch beach bods in action (pre-Porn era)? Yes, we might be living in a culture where film aggregates are becoming important to a film's success and know what? I'm glad we are. Didn't we all wish in the '90s and '00s to live in a time when the good movies made money and the bad ones tanked? Well, this is the time folks. Bet big on "Baby Driver" doing well in late June, ditto "Dunkirk," "The Beguiled" and "Detroit." Why? The film community will be supporting these artistic statements and the people will listen. Te cinematic experience is becoming too expensive, people are becoming pickier and relying more on Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic to make their decisions for them. This is my message to studios if they want box-office success: How about you just make a good movie.

Judging by my own experiences, Millennials are really into Rotten Tomatoes. Most of the ones I talk to, the non-movie writers of course, very much value a movie's RT score and do make their decision to buy a movie ticket based on that. For example, I can name you at least a dozen friends of mine that were going to watch SUICIDE SQUAD, but ended up skipping it in theaters after its horrific RT score. I'm betting Wonder Woman will now over perform at the box-office due to its rave reviews, 96% Fresh score, which has been the talk of many media outlets in the last few days. It's just the times we live in and I am glad that critics are having more and more power in relation to a movie's success.

"Insiders close to both films blame Rotten Tomatoes, with Pirates 5 and Baywatch respectively earning 32% and 19% Rotten. The critic aggregation site increasingly is slowing down the potential business of popcorn movies. Pirates 5 and Baywatch aren’t built for critics but rather general audiences, and once upon a time these types of films — a family adventure and a raunchy R-rated comedy — were critic-proof. Many of those in the industry severely question how Rotten Tomatoes computes the its ratings, and the fact that these scores run on Fandango (which owns RT) is an even bigger problem."

"Both Pirates 5 and Baywatch started high on tracking four weeks ago, $90M-$100M over four and $50M over five days respectively, and the minute Rotten Tomatoes hit, those estimates collapsed. Over the weekend, I heard that some studio insiders want to hold off critic screenings until opening day or cancel them all together (that’s pretty ambitious and would cause much ire, we’ll see if that ever happens). Already, studios and agencies are studying RT scores’ impact on advance ticket sales and tracking."

“There’s just not a great date on the calendar to open a poorly reviewed movie,” said one studio marketing vet this morning."

It's not like the box-office is filled with certified fresh movies, but your movie being well-reviewed does help. Pirates, Baywatch, Snatched and King Arthur have all underperformed, many people believe it is due to poor word of mouth.















Earlier this month I wrote:

Hollywood hasn't got an original thought in its entire collective brain. If the only originally conceived blockbuster they can come up with this summer, or for the next four months, is "Dunkirk," then we seriously have a problem here.  If all they can do is regurgitate sequels, prequels, remakes and reboots whilst ripping off everything from comics to TV to games, then this will be the result and it will be all come crashing down like the Hiddenburgh. The scourge of the bean-counter has hit them as much as anywhere else and producers need to start thinking out of the box again and encouraging new writers and fresh, original screenplays.

The Independent has this to say about the bummer summer Hollywood is about to endure:

“Some of the tent poles are just not as strong this year,” 20th Century Fox head of domestic distribution Chris Aronson says. “Pirates of the Caribbean? It's the fifth one. Transformers? It’s the fifth one.” 

'Fox has just released their sixth instalment in the Alien franchise — Alien: Covenant — and are releasing the third in the rebooted Planet of the Apes series, War for the Planet of the Apes."

I always go back to this Steven Spielberg quote, which seems to become more prophetic by the year: 

"There's eventually going to be an implosion — or a big meltdown. There's going to be an implosion where three or four or maybe even a half-dozen megabudget movies are going to go crashing into the ground, and that's going to change the paradigm. We were around when the Western died and there will be a time when the superhero movie goes the way of the Western. It doesn't mean there won't be another occasion where the Western comes back and the superhero movie someday returns." - Steven Spielberg to THR

[Deadline]

Wonder Woman: Lebanon calls for ban of film over Israeli lead Gal Gadot


Image result for wonder woman 600x200
Hey Lebanon, continue thinking like small-minded fools, that'll bring you far as a country ... Disappointing news from the land that gave us Shwaramas.
Listen to Gad Saad when he was interviewed by Joe Rogan. He talks about growing up in Lebanon and when a classmate, aged 9 years old, said in class that he wanted to become a Jew killer and everyone was okay with it. The fact that these people are anti-Jew, and acting childish like this is no surprise to me at all. It's just a matter of showing your true colors and the Lebanese government is doing just that.

Here's the exact quote from The Independent:

"Local newspaper The Daily Star (via Arab News) says the ministry is looking to "take the necessary measures" to prevent the film from being screened in the country."
"A security official told AP that a recommendation from a six-ministry-member committee would be required for the ban to be enacted. It would be the first of Gadot's films to be banned, as Fast and the Furious and Batman vs Superman were shown in Lebanon, despite the latter seeing protest from campaigners. "

David Lynch Says Movie Trailers Are "Harmful"

Image result for david lynch 600x200

I totally understand Mr. Lynch. At some point in time I was completely avoiding trailers, I still do, whenever I'm at Cannes or Sundance or TIFF, just to have that sense of surprise that comes in discovering a great movie. I'll watch the trailers to the big blockbusters because I couldn't care less if they ruin it for me, but don't ask me to watch the previews for anticipated art-house fare. No, thank you. Cinema should stay a mysterious experience. Every time I go to watch a movie I don't know anything about, in the dark, middle of the afternoon, most likely a press screening, I'm succumbing myself to the unknown and that's what cinema is all about. 

“These days, movie trailers practically tell the whole story. I think it’s really harmful. For me, personally, I don’t want to know anything when I go into a theater. I like to discover it, get into that world, try to get as good of picture and sound as possible, no interruptions – so you can have an experience. And anything that putrefies that is not good.”

[Rolling Stone]

Critic who panned 'Star Wars' stands by his review 40 years later


Bob Lundegaard is a former movie critic for the Minnesota-based Star Tribune, and he's sticking by his guns. In 1977 he wrote a mixed review for a little-known movie named "Star Wars." To say that review has haunted him for 40 years would be an understatement, so much so that four decades later he's looking back on that infamous review and still stands by his assessment. That's fine. I know a few people that don't like "Star Wars," and are proud to say so. Isn't that what film criticism is all about? As for, "The Godfather," that's unacceptable, I don't think I know a single person that doesn't like that movie. 

Here's Lundegaard, no relation to another cinematic Minnesotian from "Fargo", with his take 40 years later:

When I reviewed “Star Wars” in May 1977 — has it really been 40 years? — it already had been named Movie of the Year by Time magazine. In May. That was the kind of splash it was making all over the country.
I demurred. “It’s not even my movie of the month,” I wrote. “In fact, it’s behind ‘Annie Hall and ‘Jonah.’ ”
Ads by ZINC
“Jonah”? Jonah who? I have absolutely no recollection of the gentleman, so maybe I should have moved “Star Wars” to Number Two for May. I’ve watched “Annie Hall” dozens of times since then and never stopped laughing at Woody Allen wrestling with a lobster or trying to back up a car in Los Angeles.
“Star Wars"? I’ve never watched it since my review. Why bother? There are no surprises. And for sure no laughs.
Of course I had no idea it would become one of the most successful movies ever, spawning sequels and video games and T-shirts that collectively have grossed more than $42 billion dollars. Who knew?
But critics can be stubborn. I stand behind my original assessment, which essentially was “don’t bring your brains with you,” but “your kids will love it.” Mine certainly did, and they never let me forget it.
My mistake was paying too much attention to the hype that had accompanied the film in its journey to Minneapolis, instead of discussing the film itself. What I did say about it was, in retrospect, accurate: Great special effects, silly plot, dialogue that wasn’t very interesting. And I did point out that Carrie Fisher, unlike most cringing, hand-wringing heroines in action epics, was a take-charge woman, a sort of precursor of feminism.
So, no regrets. There are many movies I’ve watched for a second time and wished I’d been more attentive. Early Spielberg, for instance. Or “Breaking Away,” a brilliant look at class struggles in America that I treated too much as a Rocky-style underdog victory.
But “Star Wars”? I still think I was right.

Jessica Chastain doesn't like the way women were depicted at 2017 Cannes Film Festival, so Jury gives Best Director prize to Sofia Coppola's good, but not great "The Beguiled"


Oh, give me a break Jessica. You know, I love you and all, but this is going a little too far. So is giving Sofia Coppola a Best Director prize for a film that has her remaking "The Beguiled," a film that wasn't even that essential in the first place. 

I saw all 19 movies in competition and, yes, there is obviously a gender issue going on, but we are already seeing a change, every year more and more female directors are finding work. It's a great time we live in, but, in all honesty, I see Coppola winning the Directing prize like a big slap in the face. It was a protest vote, pure and simple. I really look forward to watching "The Beguiled" again, in a more rested, non-chaotic state as compared to the chaos of Cannes, but I can name you 10 or more directors in the competition that deserved that prize more than Sofia did.

I think it's a more complex problem than what she is saying. I mean, you can't really fault the movies just because they don't have a women's POV. It all starts with having more female directors, female film critics.

Jessica says this:


“This is the first time I watched 20 films in 10 days, and what I really took away from this experience is how the world views women,” Chastain says. “It was quite disturbing to me, to be honest. There were quite some exceptions. I was surprised by the representation of female characters on film.”
“I think if we include more female storytellers, I hope we have more women that I see in my own day-to-day life. They just don’t react to the men around them. They have their own point-of-view.”

'The Square' Deservedly Wins Palme D'Or

Image result for the square cannes 600x200

I'm all for this win. "The Square" had the best moments of any of the 19 competition titles I saw the last two weeks at Cannes. Yes, it's around 20 minutes too long, but that's fine. The ambition is there and this win will likely have more attention payed to its positives. More to come from Cannes tomorrow.

Last week I wrote:

"The brilliant moments in "The Square" should come as no surprise to well-seasoned cinephiles, Ostlund was marked as a talent to watch after "Force Majeure," his 2014 festival hit, put him on the mark with critics worldwide. In that film he used a more subtle tone for his own cringe worthy cinema to focus on the collapse of male manhood in Swedish society. Nevertheless, that film shares many similarities to "The Square" in terms of the tone and unabashedly sardonic wit that Ostlund displays towards his characters and story."



2017 CANNES FILM FESTIVAL AWARDS
Palme d’Or: “The Square” 

My take: Well-deserved.
Grand Prix: “120 Beats Per Minute” 

My take: Passionate, but by the books filmmaking that, nevertheless, has a beating heart, which isn't something I could say for many of the compeition titles.
Jury Prize: “Loveless” 

My take: Should have been in contention for the Palme D'or, at least Grand Prix, but, as I was stating last week, it's too puzzling for the Will Smiths of this world.
Best Actress: Diane Kruger, “In the Fade” 

My take: In my review I said that if it weren't for Krueger the film would be one of the worst compeition titles. With Krueger it's just mediocre, but it proves just how underused and talented an actress she is.
Best Actor: Joaquin Phoenix, “You Were Never Really Here” 

My take: The actor of my generation, there has been no other that has come close to the staggering greatness of Brando, De Niro and Nicholson than Phoenix.
Best Director: Sofia Coppola, “The Beguiled”

My take: a protest vote. Pure and simple. Underserved.
Best Screenplay: “The Killing of a Sacred Deer” and “You Were Never Really Here” 

My take: Odd choices, especially since these are movies that rely on visuals more than words.
Camera d’Or: “Jeunne Femme/Montparnasse Bienvenue,” directed by Leonor Serraille

My take: didn not see it

'Logan Lucky': Welcome Back Steven Soderbergh!



“Logan Lucky” is Steven Soderbergh’s first film out of his so-called retirement, which always seemed like an extension of Soderbergh performance art.  In the meantime,  he’s been concentrating on television, most notably his excellent FX show “The Knick.” Now that it’s been, frustratingly, cancelled, Soderbergh is back and ready to add more to an impressive filmography which includes “Traffic,” “The Limey,” “Out of Sight,” Sex, Lies and Videotape,” “Erin Brockvich,” and “Ocean’s Eleven.” “Logan Lucky” is a heist movie, set in the NASCAR world, starring Daniel Craig, Adam Driver, Channing Tatum, and Hilary Swank, among many others.

"Logan Lucky" comes out on August 18th.

Cannes Review: "In The Fade"

Bilderesultat for in the fade 600x200 cannes

Fatih Akin's comeback vehicle will have to wait. For a moment, the 43 year-old writer-director helming from Germany, and known for tackling topics on his Turkish roots, had amassed a few critically acclaimed hits ("The Edge of Heaven," "Head-On") but lately he's been struggling to find his voice, first making the somewhat likable, but simple-minded comedy "Soul Kitchen,"  and then back to back dramatic strikeouts with "The Cut" and "Goodbye Berlin." The Cannes competition title "In The Fade," is a mediocre revenge drama that means well, but is bogged down by conventional narrative tropes.

The film opens with a wedding. Shot in home-video style and set in a prison, Katja (Numan Acar) is marrying Nuri (Numan Acar), who is in jail for dealing drugs. Akin shoots their civil wedding with brilliant panache, the camera feels vitally alive as Nuri passes by every cell giving high fives and handshakes to inmates as he walks down the hallway of the prison to marry his bride.

Flashback a few years later and Yuri is a reformed drug-dealer, he has a stable job, working as a legal adviser to the Turkish communities in Germany, and a son, Rocco (Rafael Santana), which Katja conceived while he was in jail. Then the bombing happens and the movie changes, while Yuri and Rocco are in the office, a planned bike bomb, stationed right next to their work, explodes.

Katja begins her grieving process and is aided by her mother Annemarie (Karin Neuhauser) and Nuri’s parents Ali (Asim Demirel) and Hülya (Aysel Iscan). The the Neo-Nazis are caught and trial soon begins, one in which the best dramatic moments of the movie occur. In fact, it would have suited this film better if the courtroom drama was extended a bit before it headed down its less interesting path.

 The Nazis’ defending counsel, an arrogant, but brilliant Johannes Krisch, far outweighs the brains of Katja’s well-meaning lawyer, played by Denis Moschitto. They find loopholes, laws that render any evidence pointless and, bam, the perpetrators are free to go. 

Katja is considerably outraged when her parents tell her to move on, and her lawyer says he wants a mistrial and she will likely be back in court for a second round. She wants none of that, in fact she’d rather just take revenge herself. That is where the film starts to struggle and feels, rather, ineffective. She starts searching online for ways to make a bomb, herself starting to radicalize herself against society. 
Krueger, a great actress, does the best she can with her role. Katja is an underwritten part that she fully fleshes into moments of heartbreak, but the screenplay, by Akin and Hark Bohn, is filled with contrived clichés that we’ve seen before. There’s happy times, tragedy, grieving and revenge in “In the Fade,” but nothing that has not been seen or done before.

Making the perpetrators neo-Nazis is no coincidence, especially when you consider that Akin based the story on research into the growing number of Nazi race-hate attacks that have been happening lately to minorities in Germany. A perfectly reasoned decision to make a movie about this relevant topic, but the villains in the movie are barely fleshed out and this isn’t the story to tell for any kind of message to come across.

The villains of the film say a word here, say a word there, but there really is no side to their story. We know this was a racially-motivated attack, but would have loved to have had their characters a little more fleshed out and less caricatured. Their lack of dialogue in the screenplay has the viewer less involved and less willing to go along with Katja on her journey.

The questionable final act will no doubt have people talking, but it comes at the expense of a director that sought out to tell an important story about his country and his roots, but is instead bogged down by an overzealous mindset that leaves his own beliefs to the viewer in questionable disarray.

Cannes: 'The Beguiled'







My expectations were low, given that I'm not a fan of the original, so I was fairly surprised at how watchable it was. Owen Gleiberman said it best in his review when describing the original: "it basically has the plot of a porn film."

I thought Sofia Coppola's "The Beguiled" was a slow-burning hoot. Coppola completely sucks out any of the original's over the top sequences for more art house, painterly images instead. Wise decision. Eastwood's civil war film hasn't aged well, but Coppola saw something intriguing in remaking it as a feminist fable. The last 30 minutes are terrifically entertaining, and basically make the slow build-up of the first hour well worth the wait .... Every female performance in "The Beguiled' is great. Kidman, as the matriarch, is astonishingly subtle, but Kristen Dunst and Elle Fanning standout above the rest. Oh, the angst these two competitive women show in trying to capture this Union soldier's heart, played by Collin Farrell. It's quite amazing how minimalist Coppola's film is, there are so many rampant feminist themes and questions tackled. I'll be watching this again soon, as it's being released on June 30th.