• Home
  • Interviews
    • Yearly Top Tens
Menu

World of Reel

Street Address
City, State, Zip
Phone Number
Home
IMG_2444.jpeg
Terrence Malick Raves ‘Hamnet’: “What A Magnificent Piece of Work”
IMG_2440.webp
Ruben Östlund May Hold ‘The Entertainment System Is Down’ Until Cannes 2027
IMG_0465.jpeg
SS Rajamouli’s “VARANASI” Sets April 2027 IMAX Release Date
IMG_2439.webp
Brady Corbet’s Mysterious New Film is Titled ‘The Origin of the World’
IMG_2436.jpeg
S. Craig Zahler’s ‘The Bookie and the Bruiser’ FINALLY Shooting in March
Featured
Capture.PNG
Aug 19, 2019
3-Hour ‘Midsommar' Director's Cut Screened in NYC
Aug 19, 2019

This year’s 12th edition of the Scary Movies festival at Film at Lincoln Center premiered Ari Aster’s extended version of “Midsommar” this past Saturday.

Aug 19, 2019

World of Reel

  • Home
  • Interviews
  • More
    • Yearly Top Tens

Orson Welles’ Doc ‘They’ll love Me When I’m Dead’ is an Incalculably Important Cinematic Document

October 2, 2018 Jordan Ruimy

Morgan Neville‘s "They’ll Love Me When I’m Dead," which will play next week at Alice Tully Hall as part of the New York Film festival, is more than just about the making of Orson Welles‘ "The Other Side of the Wind," his final film which will, after being touted for the better part of three decades as the 'greatest film never released,' finally be in theaters later this fall via Netflix.

Neville's narrative in 'Dead' focuses on Welles' final few decades on earth. The documentary is an attempt to dissect Welles' controversial and mysterious personality and to explain the experimental style in which Welles' worked between 1970-1990.

Neville’s 98-minute doc is a cinephile's wet-dream and has its focus concentrated on the incalculable amount of Welles' projects which fell apart and were never completed. There's a sort of backhanded message in this film that maybe, just maybe, the legendary director never intended to finish these projects in the first place and that he was just experimenting, trying to find something out of nothing or, as Welles says, finding the "happy accidents," the stuff that happens without intention as you shoot a film. 

By trying to complete 'Other Side' Welles protege and director Peter Bogdanovich seems to be basically grabbing at straws, handicapped by Welles' improvisational style of filmmaking and editing. The upcoming released version of "The Other Side of the Wind" will likely never, not even close, come to be the version Welles' intended to be shown, even if, at some point in this doc, Bogdanovich reveals Welles' desire for his protege to continue on with the editing if anything were to happen to him. 

A few years before embarking on 'Other Side,' Welles had made "The Immortal Story," a 60-minute made-for-French-TV oddity.  Before that, he was coming off the trifecta of "Touch of Evil," "The Trial," and "Chimes at Midnight." At this phase in his career, Welles decided to radicalize himself and push the boundaries a little more. A sort of radical, Godard-ian phase for him. Which could explain why so many failed and/or unfinished projects resulted post "Chimes of Midnight." Wells wanted to reinvent cinema, but he was not sure how and he wasn't sure who would give him the funding for such experimental ventures. He did manage to squeeze a film out of this radical phase, his last one, in fact, 1974's "F For Fake.""The Other Side of the Wind" was supposed to be the other.

Welles claimed 'Other Side' was not autobiographical, but that was clearly not true. He never really wanted any of his films to have a personal connection to his pesonal life, but 'Other Side' is quite obviously about his career. The film covers the 70th birthday party of movie director Jake Hannaford (John Huston), who is struggling to make a commercial comeback. It opens with Hannaford's death just after the party, and mostly focuses on the night before his death. We also see extracts of Hannaford's daring new film-within-a-film, The Other Side of the Wind."

Welles intended for the film to be a cynical portrait of Hollywood in the 1970s, parodying the passing of the studio system, but also mocking successful European directors such as Antonioni and Bergman. We watch as Welles shoots in a variety of different styles—color, black-and-white, still photography, 8mm, 16mm and 35mm film, all rapidly intercut together. A sort of collage that Welles intended as a game-changing concept for filmmaking. It's exhilarating footage watching Welles, still excited and high on cinema, trying to bend the laws of what cinema could be.

Welles was a perfectionist, and, at some point in the footage shown, he screams "Take 21." There's incredible footage of Huston, a legend on his own right, as he shoots his role on and off during the span of a decade, he ends up making a comeback during those years by directing the Oscar-winning "The Man Who Would Be King." He and Welles were good friends that stayed in touch until the very end, even as Welles was slowly creeping into a hermit habitat, broke and trying desperately to complete the film in an extra room at Bogdanovich's Hollywood mansion, where Bogs lives with then wife Candace Bergen. An amusing anecdote, from Bergen herself, has the actress getting annoyed by Welles' presence and his constant requests for Fudgcicles to be in the fridge. 

As he was editing 'Other Side' at the aforementioned house, Welles completed around 42 minutes of avant-garde editing, it is with that template that Bogdanovich and company tried to complete the film after Welles' passing in 1988.

Looming over Welles' career, like a nasty shadow, was the inevitable comparisons of every movie he would release post Citizen Kane," that, in essence was Welles' commercial downfall. He could never replicate 'Kane' for studio heads, nobody really has in movie history,  so imagine Welles, having to deal with one-upping, what many consider to be the greatest movie ever made, his entire career. Kane was a handicap, but Welles’ largeness of spirit, his legend, his dissipating career, and the community of friends and colleagues that tried to help him complete his final statement is part of what makes Neville's documentary such an invaluable historical document.

In REVIEWS Tags Documentaries, Orson Welles, Netflix
← Louis C.K. Makes Another Surprise Appearance at Comedy Club; Garners Standing Ovation, Two People Walk OutElton John Biopic "Rocket Man" Shoots For the Stars [Trailer] →

FOLLOW US!


Trending

Featured
IMG_1936.webp
‘Snow White,’ ‘War of the Worlds,’ and ‘Hurry Up Tomorrow’ Lead the 2026 Razzies Nominees
The 10 Best Shots of Roger Deakins' Career
The 10 Best Shots of Roger Deakins' Career
IMG_1336.jpeg
Alejandro Gonzalez Iñárritu’s ‘Digger’! Tom Cruise-Starring “Comedy” Has A Teaser, Poster and Title
IMG_1311.jpeg
James Cameron Admits He Wrote ‘Point Break’ but Never Got WGA Credit: “I Flat Out Got Stiffed”

Critics Polls

Featured
Capture.PNG
Critics Poll: ‘Vertigo’ Named Best Film of the 1950s, Over 120 Participants
B16BAC21-5652-44F6-9E83-A1A5C5DF61D7.jpeg
Critics Poll: Kubrick’s ‘2001: A Space Odyssey’ Tops Our 1960s Critics Poll
Capture.PNG
Critics Poll: ‘The Godfather’ Named Best Movie of the 1970s
public.jpeg
Critics Poll: ‘Do the Right Thing' Named Best Movie of the 1980s
World of Reel tagline.PNG
 

Content

Contribute

Hire me

 

Support

Advertise

Donate

 

About

Team

Contact

Privacy Policy

Site designed by Jordan Ruimy © 2025