• Yearly Top Tens
  • Interviews
Menu

World of Reel

Street Address
City, State, Zip
Phone Number
Home
IMG_8196.jpeg
‘Spider-Man: Brand New Day’ Shatters Thursday Preview Record With $75M, Targets Historic Opening
IMG_8194.webp
Warner Bros. and Paramount Are Making Separate, Competing ‘A Nightmare on Elm Street’ Remakes
Screenshot 2026-07-30 181600.png
Does John Boorman’s ‘The Exorcist II: Heretic’ Deserve Reappraisal? New Doc (and Scorsese) Make the Case
IMG_8193.jpeg
The 25 Best Documentaries of All-Time, According to THR
IMG_8187.webp
Denis Villeneuve’s ‘Dune 3’ “Goes Beyond” ‘Messiah’ and Into Something “No One Expected”
Featured
Capture.PNG
August 19, 2019
3-Hour ‘Midsommar' Director's Cut Screened in NYC
August 19, 2019

This year’s 12th edition of the Scary Movies festival at Film at Lincoln Center premiered Ari Aster’s extended version of “Midsommar” this past Saturday.

August 19, 2019

World of Reel

  • More
    • Yearly Top Tens
  • Interviews

Oscars Reiterate That to Qualify for Best Picture A Film Will Have to Follow “Inclusive” Standards

May 10, 2023 Jordan Ruimy

The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Science held a virtual town hall meeting on Wednesday and tried to further explain to its members the implementation of its new inclusion standards for the Best Picture category.

The Academy tried to assure disgruntled members that they don’t want to “mess with the creative process,” but that’s what they seem to be doing here. Go figure.

These new rules are going into effect with the upcoming 96th Oscars to be handed out on March 10, 2024

In order for films to now qualify for Best Picture, they will need to meet two of the four new standards set forth by the Academy:

Standard A: Centers around on-screen representation and can be achieved in three ways, either by having

1) at least one of the lead actors or significant supporting actors is from an underrepresented racial or ethnic group;

2) at least 30% of all actors in secondary and more minor roles are from at least two underrepresented groups;

3) the main storyline(s), theme or narrative of the film is centered on an underrepresented group(s).

Standard B: Revolves around the creative leadership and project team behind each film and can also be achieved in three ways, by having

1) At least two of the following creative leadership positions and department heads—Casting Director, Cinematographer, Composer, Costume Designer, Director, Editor, Hairstylist, Makeup Artist, Producer, Production Designer, Set Decorator, Sound, VFX Supervisor, Writer—from underrepresented groups;

2) At least six other crew/team and technical positions (excluding Production Assistants) from an underrepresented racial or ethnic group; or

3) at least 30% of the film’s crew from underrepresented groups.

Standard C: Centers on industry access and opportunities and can be achieved via

1) The film’s distribution or financing company has paid apprenticeships or internships that include underrepresented groups; or

2) the film’s production, distribution and/or financing company offers training and/or work opportunities for below-the-line skill development to people from underrepresented groups.

Standard D: Centers on audience development and can be achieved if thethe studio and/or film company has multiple in-house senior executives from underrepresented groups including individuals from underrepresented racial or ethnic groups on their marketing, publicity, and/or distribution teams.

This is dumber than I could have ever imagined. I understand what the goal is here, but how are people supposed to know other people’s sexual orientation? What if someone decides to keep that private?

Also, what if you found the absolute perfect team for your main cast and crew, but they’re all white? The Academy would basically be infringing the creative process to force you to hire specific people, just as long as they have the right skin color.

What's missing here is any talk of merit. Isn’t it kind of insulting to give someone something they don't deserve?

Actual controversy will occur when a critically-acclaimed film with major Oscar buzz ends up not qualifying, all because of these new standards. Then we’ll have a real pickle in our hands.

← SS Rajamouli Wants to Make A 10-Part Movie Epic, His Dream Project‘Exorcist: Believer’ Bombs at NYC Test-Screening →

FOLLOW US!

No results found

Trending

Featured
IMG_7776.webp
‘The Odyssey’ Review: Christopher Nolan’s Epic Is a Flawed but Astonishing Spectacle — Rave Reviews Confirm Best Picture Frontrunner
IMG_7775.jpeg
Aaron Sorkin’s ‘The Social Reckoning’ Gets Reshoots, Won’t Premiere at Venice Film Festival
IMG_7752.jpeg
Joel Coen’s ‘Jack of Spades’ Delayed to 2027
IMG_7512.jpeg
Christopher Nolan’s Place in Cinema History: Genius, Overrated, or Something In Between?

World of Reel RSS

Critics Polls

Featured
IMG_4965.jpeg
Fritz Lang’s ‘M’ Tops the Best Films of the 1930s, According to 100+ Critics
Capture.PNG
Critics Poll: ‘Citizen Kane' Named Best Film of the 1940s
Capture.PNG
Critics Poll: ‘Vertigo’ Named Best Film of the 1950s, Over 120 Participants
B16BAC21-5652-44F6-9E83-A1A5C5DF61D7.jpeg
Critics Poll: Kubrick’s ‘2001: A Space Odyssey’ Tops Our 1960s Critics Poll
 

SEND NEWS TIPS

Summary Block
This block is invalid. Please check the block settings and try again.
Featured
Aenean eu leo Quam
World of Reel tagline.PNG
 

Content

Contribute

Hire me

 

Support

Advertise

Donate

 

About

Team

Contact

Privacy Policy

Site designed by Jordan Ruimy © 2025