• Critics Polls
  • Yearly Top Tens
  • Interviews
Menu

World of Reel

Street Address
City, State, Zip
Phone Number
Home
IMG_9594.webp
Edward Berger’s Lance Armstrong Biopic, Starring Austin Butler, Starts Production in January

Edward Berger seems to have settled on what comes next. His Lance Armstrong biopic, starring Austin Butler, is now holding casting calls, with production eyed for January.

Read more →
IMG_9596.jpeg
Ramin Bahrani’s ‘Last Meals’ to Star Mads Mikkelsen, Boyd Holbrook, Michael Shannon, and Tessa Thompson

In "Last Meals," Mikkelsen stars as Walter Karat, a disgraced former White House chef now preparing final meals for death row inmates at a maximum security prison.

Read more →
IMG_9592.jpeg
‘NAZA’: Israel Moves to Strip Citizenship From Oscar-Winning Filmmakers Behind Gaza Doc

After its much-reported Venice premiere, Israel's culture minister is vowing to strip citizenship from the two Israeli filmmakers behind "NAZA."

Read more →
IMG_9591.jpeg
Chris Rock’s ‘Misty Green’ Premieres, Rosalind Eleazar Stuns — 73 on Metacritic [TIFF]

I wouldn't call this film great — it stops short of that because of how neatly it resolves itself — but I'll give Rock his due here: this is much better than his previous directorial effort, "Top Five."

Read more →
IMG_9588.jpeg
Zack Snyder's ‘The Last Photograph’ Is Getting Destroyed at TIFF: “Unabashedly Sh*t On Every Level”

As expected, Snyder's latest is being torn apart by TIFF attendees. No mercy given. The film, which had its world premiere this evening, is being called by some one of the worst movies to ever premiere at the festival.

Read more →
Featured
Capture.PNG
August 19, 2019
3-Hour ‘Midsommar' Director's Cut Screened in NYC
August 19, 2019

This year’s 12th edition of the Scary Movies festival at Film at Lincoln Center premiered Ari Aster’s extended version of “Midsommar” this past Saturday.

Read more →
August 19, 2019

World of Reel

  • Critics Polls
  • Yearly Top Tens
  • Interviews

The Oscars is a Relic That’s Going Extinct

March 21, 2023 Jordan Ruimy

If not for work, the only televised awards show ceremony I’d watch would be the Oscars (and even then, in recent years, I’ve started to get less and less excited about them).

It used to be that movie fans worldwide would, with much-anticipation, tune into the Oscars, and for that matter almost any awards show. The glitz! The glamour! Waiting to see what film wins Best Picture also meant something, both culturally and historically. Not anymore.

I was inspired to write this after Bret Easton Ellis’ scathing remarks about the Oscar industry:

The Oscars are a publicity machine created in the 1920s to give Hollywood a morally acceptable image […] I watch because I love movies and I'm interested in seeing the image that the Hollywood industry has of itself. The interest for me is who is named, who is not. What is going through the minds of people in this community?

This is more or less where I’m at right now when it comes to the Oscars. It’s a relic that’s going extinct, and yet, I can’t look away.

Will Smith slapping Chris Rock was just the icing on the cake. Even without Smith’s horrid assault, last year’s Oscars ceremony was already on its way to infamy. You kept checking the time, waiting for this poor miserable dog of a show to end. There was barely any entertainment to it, let alone actual investment. If anything, I imagine most Americans wished for more drama, more slapping, more cussing, anything to awaken the dead horse.

This year it happened again with safe frat boy jokes from host Jimmy Kimmel and a film that epitomizes the current state of modern US cinema (“Everything Everywhere All At Once”) winning most of the top categories.

If you read many of the same articles I did then you’d think the Oscars were back with a vengeance. The number that kept being repeated was a 12% increase in viewership when compared to last year’s ceremony.

Fine, this year it was 18 million, last year it was 16 million, but in the middle of a pandemic that had far less people going to the movies. This year the Academy tried, with the nominated films including blockbusters like “Top Gun: Maverick,” “Avatar: The Way of Water” and “Elvis.” That helped.

Maybe it’s because Hollywood movies just aren’t as culturally relevant as they used to be. One can remember a time when Best Picture winners such as “Gladiator,” “Titanic,” “The Silence of the Lambs,” “Forrest Gump,” and “The Lord of the Rings” were actually seen by millions of Americans. Now? Who's actually seen “CODA”? “Nomadland”? These just aren’t films that Americans get excited about.

Sure, EEAAO made $60 million domestically, but that doesn’t mean it’s been embraced by mainstream moviegoers. I’ve spoken to so many people, non-film-industry types, who were puzzled by its win. They couldn’t even finish the movie.

It doesn’t help that people used to watch awards shows for the stars. The problem is that today’s movie stars are very different: It would be kind of hard to get Captain America, Spider-Man, Iron Man and Doctor Strange to walk down the red carpet in their spandex suits … unless Evans, Holland, Downey and Cumberbatch are game to do that.

It’s no surprise then that the Oscars have had flailing ratings this last decade. Yes, the 2023 telecast had an increase in viewership when compared to 2021 and 2022’s pandemic-inflicted ceremonies, but it still managed to be the third lowest-rated Oscar ceremony in history. Truth be told, ratings would have probably been lower without Smith slapping Chris Rock, a shocking moment that had friends messaging friends to tune in live.

Isn’t it strange how in 2014, not that long ago, viewership for the Oscars was at 40 million? That’s a loss of 22 million viewers when compared to this month’s ceremony.

The biggest factor in the loss of relevance though is that the idea of awards shows is now seen as this ridiculous concept. Watching the 1% showering the 1% with trophy love is just not something that’s compatible with our current societal zeitgeist.

The dip in audiences falls in line with every other awards show telecast losing viewers over the past few years. This past January’s NBC broadcast of the Golden Globes brought in the lowest ratings ever for the ceremony.

Don’t kid yourselves either, there’s no reason for ratings to go back up to those 2014 numbers. Ever again. People are tuning in less and less, but unless an expected slap occurs every year, and the oscars turn into the WWE, then this is a ship sinking quicker than the Titanic.

← The Daniels Assure Us They Are Not Being “Sucked Up By The Corporate Machine”Quentin Tarantino Almost Cast Isabelle Huppert in ‘Inglorious Basterds’ →

FOLLOW US!

Subscribe to our newsletter

Enjoying World of Reel?

Get film news, rumors and industry stories delivered straight to your inbox.

Thank you!
No results found

Trending

Featured
IMG_9412.jpeg
Joaquin Phoenix Reuniting with Mike Mills for Next Film, Shooting in January 2027

Phoenix is set to reunite with Mills on this next film, which is being distributed by A24 and starts shooting January 2027. This will be Phoenix’s first film since “Eddington.”

Read more →
IMG_9228.jpeg
Paul Thomas Anderson Has Already Chosen His Next Film, Jonny Greenwood Says

“Paul is getting close to pressing the button on the next film, I believe, and I’m already trying to learn a new instrument that would be central to it,” Greenwood tells Screen Daily. 

Read more →
IMG_9202.jpeg
Ridley Scott Says “I Didn’t Say That” After Calling ‘The Dog Stars’ His Best Movie Since ‘The Martian’

In June 2026, Scott told The Buyer that “The Dog Stars” is “probably the best movie I’ve done since The Martian.” He’s now denying he ever said that.

Read more →
IMG_9001.jpeg
Todd Field-Written ‘The Girls’ Sets Antoneta Alamat Kusijanovic to Direct, November Shoot

Cinephiles another Todd Field movie, and although we might have to wait for his next directorial effort, “The Girls” will have to suffice for now.

Read more →

Critics Polls

Featured
IMG_4965.jpeg
Fritz Lang’s ‘M’ Tops the Best Films of the 1930s, According to 100+ Critics

We’ve gone through the decades. The ‘40s ‘50s, ‘60s, ‘70s, ‘80s, ‘90s, ‘2000s, and ‘2010s. — all revisited, argued over. Now, here are the results for the best films of the 1930s.

Read more →
Capture.PNG
Critics Poll: ‘Citizen Kane' Named Best Film of the 1940s

The results are in, and according to critics, this decade filled with cinematic riches did not have a better film than Orson Welles’ “Citizen Kane.” Nobody should be surprised by this result. “Citizen Kane” changed cinema forever.

Read more →
Capture.PNG
Critics Poll: ‘Vertigo’ Named Best Film of the 1950s, Over 120 Participants

It was a closer race than anticipated, but Alfred Hitchcock’s “Vertigo” has topped our best of the ’50s poll, besting Gene Kelly and Stanley Donen’s “Singin’ in the Rain” by just two votes.

Read more →
B16BAC21-5652-44F6-9E83-A1A5C5DF61D7.jpeg
Critics Poll: Kubrick’s ‘2001: A Space Odyssey’ Tops Our 1960s Critics Poll

We’ve already covered the 1970s, 1980s, 1990s, 2000s, and 2010s. Now we have the results for the Best Films of the 1960s.

Read more →
 

SEND NEWS TIPS

Summary Block
This block is invalid. Please check the block settings and try again.
Featured
Aenean eu leo Quam
Aenean eu leo Quam

Quisque iaculis facilisis lacinia. Mauris euismod pellentesque tellus sit amet mollis.

Read more →
World of Reel tagline.PNG
 

Content

Contribute

Subscribe

 

Support

Advertise

Donate

 

About

Team

Contact

Privacy Policy

Site designed by Jordan Ruimy © 2026