• Interviews
    • Yearly Top Tens
Menu

World of Reel

Street Address
City, State, Zip
Phone Number
Home
IMG_6823.jpeg
Uwe Boll Says Germany “Banned” ‘Citizen Vigilante’ Over Its Depiction of Migration Crime
IMG_6821.jpeg
Francis Ford Coppola’s ‘Glimpses of the Moon’ Struggling to Secure Financing
IMG_6812.jpeg
Anya Taylor-Joy Confirmed to Star in ‘The Hunt For Gollum’
IMG_6810.jpeg
Steven Spielberg Says He Would Never Make a Netflix Movie: “I’m a Moviemaker Who Believes in 70mm Theatrical”
IMG_6797.jpeg
Duffer Brothers’ Mysterious Film at Paramount Gets November 2028 Release Date
Featured
Capture.PNG
August 19, 2019
3-Hour ‘Midsommar' Director's Cut Screened in NYC
August 19, 2019

This year’s 12th edition of the Scary Movies festival at Film at Lincoln Center premiered Ari Aster’s extended version of “Midsommar” this past Saturday.

August 19, 2019

World of Reel

  • Interviews
  • More
    • Yearly Top Tens

Five Years Ago Today, Darren Aronofsky’s ‘mother!’ Was Released

September 15, 2022 Jordan Ruimy

Darren Aronofsky most definitely became the most polarizing figure in movie culture back in the fall of 2017. His controversial “mother!” provoked a volcanic stir of reactions. It’s been exactly five years since that movie got released.

During the first press screening at the Venice Film Festival, there were both loud boos and people standing up to cheer as the movie ended. I was, and still am, in-between. I admired the sheer chutzpah of the film, but ultimately felt it didn’t work as a whole, as it opted to, first and foremost, provoke rather than coherently grab your interest.

The mainstream was bewildered, provoked and flat-out infuriated by “mother!”, with its non-conventional narrative, shocking images and frustrating loop of a story being the cause of the chaos.

Many adventurous moviegoers firmly appreciated what Aronofsky did; It was hard for any of us to really complain about a studio movie taking the kind of bold leaps you saw in “mother!”

Critics were split, with its 68% Rotten Tomatoes score confirming the polarization. Audiences all but shunned the film (a tepid box-office debut of $7.6 million) giving it a rare and almost unprecedented F grade on Cinemascore.

Even good old curmudgeon Rex Reed dubbed it the “worst movie of the 21st century” in his review. Amusingly, Reed ended up being quoted on the movie poster. Paramount were capitalizing on the noise around the film and campaigned it with a “we dare you to see it” kind of promotional campaign.

Aronofsky and then-girlfriend Jennifer Lawrence broke up soon after the film’s release. Lawrence ended up getting an undeserved Razzie nomination for Worst Actress. She later confessed to Variety that the bad reviews for “mother!” hurt her relationship with Aronofsky.

Time to rewatch this one tonight.

← Oscars: Critics Pushing ‘The Woman King’Taika Waititi’s ‘Next Goal Wins’ Being Released in April 2023 →

FOLLOW US!

No results found

Trending

Featured
Capture.PNG
What’s the Best Four-Film Run by a Director?
IMG_6348.jpeg
Clint Eastwood Turns 96 as Son Kyle Says the Legendary Director Has “Retired”
IMG_6339.webp
Martin Scorsese’s $200M Hawaii Mob Movie Nears Greenlight as Major Rewrite Set to Be Submitted to 20th Century
IMG_6307.jpeg
Robert De Niro Teases “At Least One More” Movie With Martin Scorsese

World of Reel RSS

Critics Polls

Featured
IMG_4965.jpeg
Fritz Lang’s ‘M’ Tops the Best Films of the 1930s, According to 100+ Critics
Capture.PNG
Critics Poll: ‘Citizen Kane' Named Best Film of the 1940s
Capture.PNG
Critics Poll: ‘Vertigo’ Named Best Film of the 1950s, Over 120 Participants
B16BAC21-5652-44F6-9E83-A1A5C5DF61D7.jpeg
Critics Poll: Kubrick’s ‘2001: A Space Odyssey’ Tops Our 1960s Critics Poll
 

SEND NEWS TIPS

Summary Block
This block is invalid. Please check the block settings and try again.
Featured
Aenean eu leo Quam
World of Reel tagline.PNG
 

Content

Contribute

Hire me

 

Support

Advertise

Donate

 

About

Team

Contact

Privacy Policy

Site designed by Jordan Ruimy © 2025